Aligning Decision Support with Shop Floor Operations: A Proposal of Intelligent Product Based on BDI Physical Agents
Abstract
MAS models have the drawback of an excessive dependence on up-to date field information and on complex interaction protocols. This work proposes a theoretical and experimental agent-based Decision Support System (DSS) architecture that is designed and developed to align shop floor operations, but including the Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) information feedback. Based on these automatic product feedbacks generated by the RFID visibility frameworks, the proposed Multi-Agent System (MAS) allows defining a competitive space where intelligent products negotiate by using their own knowledge and global/business constraints. Specifically, this product-driven MAS has been structured on a split organization model to enforce the idea of division between physical elements and “Information and Communication Technologies” (ICT). This division into two platforms simplifies the design, the development and the validation of the MAS in shop floor environments, providing a higher level of abstraction and preserving the independence between platforms. The proposed MAS framework, called MAS-DUO, has been tested in the ground handling operations at the Ciudad Real Central Airport and in a simulated logistics centre at the Autolog Labs-UCLM. This paper introduces the BDI physical agents of this framework as the core of this new approach, a new vision that mixes Beliefs-Desires-Intentions (BDI) reasoning, RFID and the Markov Decision Process (MDP).
Keywords
BDI Physical agents RFID DSSReferences
- 1.Luftman, J., Kempaiah, R.: The IS organization of the future: the IT talent challenge. Inform. Syst. Manage. 24, 129–138 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Luftman, J., Kempaiah, R.: An update on business-it alignment: “A Line” has been drawn. MIS Q. Executive 6, 165–177 (2007)Google Scholar
- 3.Venkatraman, N., Henderson, J.C., Oldach, S.: Continuous strategic alignment: exploiting information technology capabilities for competitive success. Eur. Manag. J. 11, 139–149 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Camponovo, G., Pigneur, Y., Lausanne, S.: Information systems alignment in uncertain environments. In: Proceedings of Decision Support Systems (DSS) (2004)Google Scholar
- 5.Avila, O., Goepp, V., Kiefer, F.: Understanding and classifying information system alignment approaches. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. 50, 2–14 (2009)Google Scholar
- 6.Ashford, N., Stanton, H., Moore, C.: Airport Operations. McGraw-Hill Professional, New York (1998)Google Scholar
- 7.Cavalieri, S., Gaiardelli, P., Ierace, S.: Aligning strategic profiles with operational metrics in after-sales service. Int. J. Prod. Perform. Manage. 56, 436–455 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Atzori, L., Iera, A., Morabito, G.: The internet of things: a survey. Comput. Netw. 54, 2787–2805 (2010)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- 9.Uckelmann, D., Harrison, M., Michahelles, F.: An architectural approach towards the future internet of things. In: Architecting the Internet of Things, pp. 1–24. Springer, Berlin (2011)Google Scholar
- 10.Wong, C.Y., McFarlane, D., Ahmad Zaharudin, A., Agarwal, V.: The intelligent product driven supply chain. In: 2002 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 4. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
- 11.Gebauer, H., Fleisch, E., Friedli, T.: Overcoming the service paradox in manufacturing companies. Eur. Manag. J. 23, 14–26 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wang, G., Huang, S.H., Dismukes, J.P.: Product-driven supply chain selection using integrated multi-criteria decision-making methodology. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 91, 1–16 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Meyer, G.G., Främling, K., Holmström, J.: Intelligent products: a survey. Comput. Ind. 60, 137–148 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.McFarlane, D., Giannikas, V., Wong, A.C., Harrison, M.: Product intelligence in industrial control: theory and practice. Ann. Rev. Control 37, 69–88 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Babiceanu, R.F., Chen, F.F.: Development and applications of Holonic manufacturing systems: a survey. J. Intell. Manuf. 17, 111–131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Marik, V., McFarlane, D.: Industrial adoption of agent-based technologies. Intell. Syst. IEEE 20, 27–35 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.FIPA-OS: Foundation for Intelligent Physical Agents. Specifications and documentation. http://www.fipa.org (2014)
- 18.Bellifemine, F., Poggi, G., Rimassa, G.: JADE—a white paper (2003)Google Scholar
- 19.Howden, N., Hodgson, A., Lucas, A.: JACK Intelligent agents: summary of an agent infrastructure. In: The 5th International Conference on Autonomous Agents, Workshop on Infrastructure for Agents, MAS and Scalable MAS (2001)Google Scholar
- 20.Leitão, P.: Agent-based distributed manufacturing control: a state-of-the-art survey. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 22, 979–991 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Sánchez López, T., Brintrup, A., McFarlane, D., Dwyer, D.: Selecting a multi-agent system development tool for industrial applications: a case study of self-serving aircraft assets. In: 4th IEEE International Conference on Digital Ecosystems and Technologies (DEST), pp. 400–405. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
- 22.Gerber, C., Siekmann, J.R., Vierke, G.: Holonic multi-agent systems (2011)Google Scholar
- 23.García Ansola, P., de las Morenas, J., García, A., Otamendi, J.: Distributed decision support system for airport ground handling management using WSN and MAS. Eng. Appl. AI 25, 544–553 (2012)Google Scholar
- 24.García Higuera, A., de las Morenas, J.: Application of the classical levels of intelligence to structuring the control system in an automated distribution centre. J. Intell. Manuf. 25, 1197–1206 (2014)Google Scholar