Advertisement

Analysis and Classification of Public Spaces Using Convex and Solid-Void Models

  • José Nuno BeirãoEmail author
  • André Chaszar
  • Ljiljana Čavić
Part of the Springer Optimization and Its Applications book series (SOIA, volume 102)

Abstract

Urban planning and design are increasingly often supported by analytical models of urban space. We present a method of representation for analysis and classification of open urban spaces based on physical measures including three-dimensional data to overcome some observed limitations of two-dimensional methods. Beginning with “convex voids” constructed from 2D plan information and 3D data including topography and building facade heights, we proceed to “solid voids” constructed by aggregation of convex voids. We describe rules for construction of both convex voids and solid voids, including basic forms and their adjustment for perception. For analysis we develop descriptive characteristic values such as enclosure, openness, granularity and connectivity, derived from more basic geometric properties of the void representations. We also show how combinations of these values can be correlated with urban open space typologies, including commonly accepted traditional ones as well as previously unnamed classes of space. Concluding with discussion of some future planned developments in this work, we also propose that such methods can contribute to better understanding of the relations between urban forms and their perception and use, so as to guide urban transformations for improved urban quality.

Keywords

Urban open public space Urban spatial analysis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Ljiljana Cavic is a PhD scholarship holder funded by FCT (Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia Portugal) with a reference SFRH/BD/76730/2011

References

  1. 1.
    Ratti, C.: Urban texture and space syntax: Some inconsistencies. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 31(4), 487–499 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hillier, B., Penn, A.: Rejoinder to Carlo Ratti. Environ. Plan. B Plan. Des. 31(4), 501–511 (2004)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Habraken, N.J.: The Structure of the Ordinary, p. 40. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nan, L., Sharf, A., Xie, K., Wong, T.-T., Deussen, O., Cohen-Or, D., Chen, B.: Conjoining gestalt rules for abstraction of architectural drawings. ACM Trans. Graph. 30(6), 185:1–185:10 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Alexander, C.: A city is not a tree. Ekistics 139, 344–348 (1968)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hillier, B., Hanson, J.: The Social Logic of Space. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marshall, S.: Streets & Patterns. Routledge, London (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dhanani, A., Vaughan, L., Ellul, C., Griffiths, S.: From the axial line to the walked line: Evaluating the utility of commercial and user-generated street network datasets’ in space syntax analysis. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Space Syntax Symposium (2012).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jiang, B., Claramunt, C.: Integration of space syntax into GIS: New perspectives for urban morphology. Trans. GIS 6(3), 295–309 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Beirão, J.: CItyMaker: Designing Grammars for Urban Design. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, Charleston (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Beirão, J., Arrobas, P., Duarte, J.P.: Parametric urban design: Joining morphology and urban indicators in a single interactive model. In: Achten H., Pavlicek J., Hulin J., Matejdan D. (eds.) Digital Physicality - Proceedings of the 30th eCAADe Conference - Volume 1/ISBN 978-9-4912070-2-0, pp.167–175, Czech Technical University in Prague, Faculty of Architecture (Czech Republic), 12–14 September 2012.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gil, J., Beirão, J.N., Montenegro, N., Duarte, J.P.: On the discovery of urban typologies: Data mining the multi-dimensional morphology of urban areas. Urban Morphol. 16(1), 27–40 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sokmenoglu, A., Gulen, C., Sevil, S.: A multi-dimensional exploration of urban attributes by data mining. In: Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures 2011 [Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Computer Aided Architectural Design Futures/ISBN 9782874561429], pp. 333–350, Liege (Belgium) 4–8 July 2011.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chaszar, A.: Navigating complex models in collaborative work for integrated and sustainable design. In: Proceedings, CAADFutures, Liege (2011a).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Chaszar, A.: Spatial query and object recognition to support 3D digital building model use. EG-ICE workshop, Twente (2011b).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Chaszar, A., Beirão, J.N.: Feature recognition and clustering for urban modelling. In Proceedings, CAADRIA, Singapore (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Beirão, J.N., Chaszar, A., Cavic, L.: Convex- and solid-void models for analysis and classification of public space. In: Proceedings, CAADRIA, Kyoto (2014).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beng-Huat, C.: Decoding the political in civic spaces: An interpretive essay. In: Chua, B.H., Edwards, N. (eds.) Public Space: Design, Use, and Management, pp. 55–68. Singapore University Press, Singapore (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Nuno Beirão
    • 1
    Email author
  • André Chaszar
    • 2
    • 3
  • Ljiljana Čavić
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of ArchitectureUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.O-Design Research and ConsultingNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of ArchitectureDelft University of TechnologyDelftThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations