Advertisement

How Can Information Systems Help to Make Policymaking Be More Sensitive to Global Long-Term Perspectives?

  • Adrian Dolensky
  • Stefan Laube
  • Elena Gorbacheva
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Information Systems book series (BRIEFSINORMAT)

Abstract

In the last decades several positive world trends have indicated that, in general, the world is getting healthier, better educated, richer, more peaceful, and better connected.

References

  1. Braess, D., Nagurney, A., & Wakolbinger, T. (2005). On a paradox of traffic planning. Transportation Science, 39(4), 446–450. doi: 10.1287/trsc.1050.0127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cockerill, K., Daniel, L., Malczynski, L., & Tidwell, V. (2009). A fresh look at a policy sciences methodology: Collaborative modeling for more effective policy. Policy Sciences, 42(3), 211–225. doi: 10.1007/s11077-009-9080-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dolowitz, D. P., & Marsh, D. (2000). Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy-making. Governance, 13(1), 5–23. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Edwards, P. N. (1996). Global comprehensive models in politics and policymaking. Climatic Change, 32(2), 149–161. Retrieved from http://www.springerlink.com/index/M950J6027250521Q.pdf.
  5. Glenn, J., Gordon, T., & Florescu, E. (2011). 2011 State of the future (1st ed.). The Millennium Project.Google Scholar
  6. Gordon, T. J. (2003). State of the Future Index (SOFI): A method for improving decision making that affects the future. 21st century opportunities and challenges: an age of destruction or an age of transformation (p. 37).Google Scholar
  7. Gordon, T. J. (2009). The Real-Time Delphi Method. Futures Research Methodology Version, 3.Google Scholar
  8. Guiraudon, V. (2000). European Integration and migration policy: vertical policy-making as venue shopping. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 251–271. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00219.Google Scholar
  9. Keen, P. G. W. (1981). Information systems and organizational change. Communications of the ACM, 24(1), 24–33.Google Scholar
  10. Kreileman, E., Leemans, R., & Alcamo, J. (1996). Global models meet global policy: How can global and regional modellers connect with environmental policy makers? What has hindered them? What has helped? Science, 6, 255–259.Google Scholar
  11. Lampathaki, F., Koussouris, S., Charalabidis, Y., Asjounis, D., Mouzakitis, S., Passas, S., et al. (2010). State of the art. In F. Lampathaki, S. Koussouris, Y. Charalabidis, & D. Asjounis (Eds.), ICT for governance and policy modelling. CROSSROAD White Paper.Google Scholar
  12. Larrain, F. B., Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. (2000). A structural analysis of Chile’s long-term growth: History, prospects and policy implications*. Growth (Lakeland), (January).Google Scholar
  13. Leach, M. (2008). Re-framing resilience: a symposium report. In Symposium a quarterly journal In modern foreign literatures.Google Scholar
  14. Lempert, R., Popper, S., & Bankes, S. (2004). Shaping the next one hundred years: new methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. Technological forecasting and social change (Vol. 71). Santa Monica: RAND. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2003.09.006.
  15. Lempert, R., Scheffran, J., & Sprinz, D. F. (2009). Methods for long-term environmental policy challenges. Global Environmental Politics, 9(3), 106–133. Retrieved from http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1162/glep.2009.9.3.106.
  16. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In Proceedings of the 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. 00(C), p. 10. doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2004.1265300.
  17. Mark, M. M., Henry, G., & Julnes, G. (2000). Evaluation: an integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs (p. 400). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  18. McCartney, G. (1988). Implementing computer-based systems. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual ACM SIGUCCS Conference on User Services—SIGUCCS ’88 (pp. 117–122). doi: 10.1145/62548.62581.
  19. Misuraca, G., Broster, D., & Centeno, C. (2011). Digital Europe 2030: Designing scenarios for ICT in future governance and policy making. Government Information Quarterly. doi: 10.1016/j.giq.2011.08.006.Google Scholar
  20. Parr, T. W., Sier, A. R. J., Battarbee, R. W., Mackay, A., & Burgess, J. (2003). Detecting environmental change: science and society-perspectives on long-term research and monitoring in the 21st century. The Science of the Total Environment, 310(1–3), 1–8. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00257-2.
  21. Phang, C. W., & Kankanhalli, A. (2008). A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Communications of the ACM, 51(12), 128. doi: 10.1145/1409360.1409385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Randolph, J. (2009). A guide to writing the dissertation literature review. Practical Assessment Research Evaluation, 14(13). Retrieved from http://www.mendeley.com/research/guide-writing-dissertation-literature-review-1/.
  23. Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution. World, 03(01), 17.Google Scholar
  24. Tumer, K., & Wolpert, D. H. (2000). Collective Intelligence and Braess’ Paradox. In Proceedings of AAAI 2000. Morgan Kauffman.Google Scholar
  25. Vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search proccess. In ECIS 2009 (pp. 1–13). Verona.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Adrian Dolensky
    • 1
  • Stefan Laube
    • 2
  • Elena Gorbacheva
    • 2
  1. 1.University of LiechtensteinVaduzLiechtenstein
  2. 2.University of MünsterMünsterGermany

Personalised recommendations