Advertisement

Performance Metrics for the Putting Process

  • Gonçalo DiasEmail author
  • Micael S. Couceiro
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology book series (BRIEFSAPPLSCIENCES)

Abstract

Although most of the traditional research around sport science is centered on the product variables, many researchers have been working toward a better understanding of the process measurements of motor execution. By studying those variables, one may further understand the reasons behind the stability and variability of the final outcome (i.e., the product variables previously presented). In spite of this, several authors, such as Delay et al. (1997), Coello et al. (2000), Hume et al. (2005), Couceiro et al. (2013) and Dias et al. (2013) have proposed methodologies to study process variables in golf putting during each of its phases (cf. Chap.  2), giving particular attention to the position, velocity and acceleration of the putter. Most of the current research on this subject focuses on specific properties of the process variables, such as amplitude, period, maximum or minimum values, etc. This chapter will start by presenting the insights regarding variables provided in the literature. Despite the useful information provided by those process variables, the difficulty remains in proposing an adequate analysis methodology encompassing the overall motor execution of the athlete. This is still considered an open challenge since, as opposed to the product variables previously presented, most of the process variables, either related to golf putting or not, are time-variant, i.e., they are classified as a time series. Those variables are directly related with human movement and, as biological processes, the analysis should consider the overall information over time. However, this sort of tool, mostly of a non-linear nature, requires specialized knowledge on engineering and mathematics. Nevertheless, after introducing the most traditional research around putting process variables, this chapter will delineate a methodology to bring the science of golf to a new level of understanding.

Keywords

Golf putting Process variables Performance Time series analysis Non-linear methods Measures and statistics 

References

  1. Araújo D, Davids K, Hristovski R (2006) The ecological dynamics of decision making in sport. Psychol Sport Exerc 7(6):653–676. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.928749 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bishop CM (2006) Pattern recognition and machine learning (information science and statistics). Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Coello Y, Delay D, Nougier V, Orliaguet JP (2000) Temporal control of impact movement: the “time from departure” control hypothesis in golf putting. Int J Sport Psychol 31(1):24–46. ISSN 0047-0767Google Scholar
  4. Couceiro MS, Dias G, Martins FML, Luz JM (2012a) A fractional calculus approach for the evaluation of the golf lip-out. SIViP 6(3):437–443. doi: 10.1007/s11760-012-0317-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Couceiro MS, Portugal D, Gonçalves N, Rocha R, Luz JM, Figueiredo CM, Dias G (2012b) A methodology for detection and estimation in the analysis of golf putting. Pattern Anal Appl 16:459–474. doi: 10.1007/s10044-012-0276-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Couceiro MS, Dias G, Mendes R, Araújo D (2013) Accuracy of pattern detection methods in the performance of golf putting. J Mot Behav 45(1):37–53. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2012.740100 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Davids K, Button C, Bennett SJ (2008) Dynamics of skill acquisition—a constraints-led approach. Human Kinetics Publishers, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  8. Delay D, Nougier V, Orliaguet JP, Coello Y (1997) Movement control in golf putting. Hum Mov Sci 16(5):597–619. doi: 10.1016/S0167-9457(97)00008-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dias G, Mendes R, Couceiro MS, Figueiredo C, Luz JMA (2013) On a ball’s trajectory model for putting’s evaluation, computational intelligence and decision making—trends and applications, from intelligent systems, control and automation: science and engineering bookseries. Springer, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Dias G, Couceiro MS, Barreiros J, Clemente FM, Mendes R, Martins FM (2014a) Distance and slope constraints: adaptation and variability in golf putting. Mot Control 18(3):221–243. doi: 10.1123/mc.2013-0055 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dias G, Couceiro M, Clemente F, Martins F, Mendes R (2014b) A new approach for the study of golf putting. S Afr J Res Sport Phys 36(2):61–77. ISBN 0379-9069Google Scholar
  12. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A New Optimizer Using Particle Swarm Theory. Proc of 6th International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, Nagoya, Japan. IEEE Service Center Piscataway NJ:39– 43Google Scholar
  13. Gershenfeld N (2011) The nature of mathematical modeling. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghamisi P, Couceiro MS, Martins FM, Benediktsson JA (2014) Multilevel image segmentation based on fractional-order darwinian particle swarm optimization. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 52:2382–2394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gill PE, Murray W, Wright MH (1981) Practical Optimization Academic PressGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleick J (1987) Chaos: making a new science, Viking Penguin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Grassberger P, Procaccia I (1983) Characterization of strange attractors. Phys Rev Lett 50(5):346–349. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.50.346 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. Harbourne RT, Stergiou N (2009) Movement variability and the use of nonlinear tools: principles to guide physical therapist practice. JNPT Am Phys Ther 89(3):267–282. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J, Hastie T, Friedman J, Tibshirani R (2009) The elements of statistical learning, vol 2, no 1. Springer, New York. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7
  20. Hume PA, Keogh J, Reid D (2005) The role of biomechanics in maximising distance and accuracy of golf shots. Sports Med 35(5):429–449. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535050-00005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jonassen DH, Grabowski BL (1993) Handbook of individual differences, learning and instruction. Lawrence Erlbaum, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  22. Karlsen J (2003) Golf putting: an analysis of elite-players technique and performance. Dissertation, Norway School of Sport SciencesGoogle Scholar
  23. Karlsen J, Smith G, Nilsson J (2008) The stroke has only a minor influence on direction consistency in golf putting among elite players. J Sports Sci 26(3):243–250. doi: 10.1080/02640410701530902
  24. Newell KM (1986) Constraints on the development of coordination. In: Wade MG, Whiting HTA (eds) Motor development in children: aspects of coordination and control. Martinus Nijhoff, BostonGoogle Scholar
  25. Pincus S, Singer BH (1998) A recipe for randomness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(18):10367–10372CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  26. Pincus S, Gladstone MIM, Ehrenkranz RA (1991) A regularity statistic for medical data analysis. J Clin Monit 7(4):335–345. doi: 10.1007/BF01619355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Prusinkiewicz P (2004) Modeling plant growth and development. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7(1):79–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenstein MT, Collins JJ, Luca CJ (1993) A practical method for calculating largest Lyapunov exponents from small data sets. Phys Nonlinear Phenom 65(1–2):117–134. doi: 10.1016/0167-2789(93)90009-P CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  29. Sato S, Sano M, Sawada Y (1987) Practical methods of measuring the generalized dimension and the largest Lyapunov exponent in high dimensional chaotic systems. Prog Theor Phys 77:1–5Google Scholar
  30. Schöllhorn W, Mayer-Kress G, Newell KM, Michelbrink M (2008) Time scales of adaptive behavior and motor learning in the presence of stochastic perturbations. Hum Mov Sci 28(3):319–333. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2008.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Stergiou N, Decker LM (2011) Human movement variability, nonlinear dynamics, and pathology: is there a connection? Hum Mov Sci 30(5):869–888. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2011.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Stergiou N, Buzzi UH, Kurz MJ, Heidel J (2004) Non-linear tools in human movement. In: Stergiou N (ed) Innovative analyses of human movement. Human Kinetics Publishers, Champaign, pp 163–186Google Scholar
  33. Suykens JAK, Van Gestel T, De Brabanter J, De Moor B, Vandewalle J (2009) Least squares support vector machines. World Scientific, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  34. Takens F (1981) Detecting strange attractors in turbulence. In dynamical systems and turbulence, Warwick 1980. Springer, Berlin, pp 366–381. doi: 10.1007/BFb0091924
  35. Tillett J, Rao TM, Sahin F, Rao R, Brockport S (2005) Darwinian particle swarm optimization. In: Prasad B (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd Indian international conference on artificial intelligence. Pune, India, pp 1474–1487Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sport Sciences and Physical EducationUniversity of CoimbraCoimbraPortugal
  2. 2.Ingeniarius, Lda.MealhadaPortugal

Personalised recommendations