Advertisement

Sustainability in Trade and Investment Agreements

  • Evita SchmiegEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Natural Resource Management in Transition book series (NRMT, volume 2)

Abstract

This chapter will examine the links between sustainability and trade, and explore how sustainability issues are dealt with in Free Trade Agreements (FTAs), with special emphasis on labour issues. Recently, the discussion of whether FTAs contribute to or rather undermine countries’ efforts to improve the sustainability of their economies has become very controversial. Sustainability issues have not been dealt with explicitly in Free Trade Agreements for a long time. Efforts by the US and the EU to put labour standards on the agenda of the world trade negotiations beginning in 2001 failed due to the resistance of developing countries. They feared at the time that the issue would be used for protectionist purposes only, and would hinder the use of their comparative advantages, namely their low labour costs.

References

  1. Ebert FC, Posthuma A (2011) Labour provisions in trade arrangements: current trends and perspectives. International Institute for Labour Studies of the International Labour Organization, Geneva. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/%2D%2D-dgreports/%2D%2D-inst/documents/publication/wcms_192807.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  2. EC – European Commission (2008) Economic partnership agreement between the CARIFORUM States, of the one part, and the European Community and its Member States, of the other part. Official Journal of the European Union L 289/I/3. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:289:0003:1955:EN:PDF. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  3. EC – European Commission (2016a) Annex to the proposal for a council decision on the signing on behalf of the European Union of the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement between Canada of the one part, and the European Union and its Member States, of the other part, Annex 1, COM(2016)444final, Strasbourg, 5.7.2016. http://ec.europa.eu/transparency/regdoc/rep/1/2016/EN/1-2016-444-EN-F1-1-ANNEX-1.PDF. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  4. EC – European Commission (2016b) Handbook for trade sustainability impact assessments, 2nd edn. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2016/april/tradoc_154464.PDF. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  5. George C (2014) Environment and regional trade agreements: emerging trends and policy drivers, OECD Trade and Environment Working Papers, 2014/02. OECD Publishing, Paris.  https://doi.org/10.1787/5jz0v4q45g6h-en CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. ILO – International Labour Organization (1998) ILO declaration on fundamental principles and rights at work and its follow-up, adopted by the International Labour Conference at its Eighty-sixth Session, Geneva, 18 June 1998 (Annex revised 15 June 2010). http://www.ilo.org/declaration/thedeclaration/textdeclaration/lang%2D%2Den/index.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  7. ILO – International Labour Organization (2016) Assessment of labour provisions in trade and investment arrangements, studies on growth with equity. ILO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  8. OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2016) Aid for trade. http://www.oecd.org/trade/aft/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  9. Schmieg E (2006) Theorie der Regionalen Integration – die EU und die Karibik. Ph.D. diss, University of LeipzigGoogle Scholar
  10. Schmieg E (2015) Trade and investment agreements for sustainable development? Lessons from the EU’s Economic Partnership Agreement with the Caribbean, SWP Research Paper 6. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-439933. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  11. Schmieg E (2016) Business and human rights: towards a German action plan and EU trade and investment agreements. Great Insights 4(6):40–41Google Scholar
  12. Schmieg E (2017) External trade policy and the sustainable development goals: implementing the SDGs will meet justified criticisms of globalisation, SWP Comments 39, October 2017. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2017C39_scm.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  13. Schmieg E (2018a) Comment: TSD chapters in EU FTAs – fig leaf or necessary tool for SDGs? Borderlex.eu, 28.02.2018. http://www.borderlex.eu/comment-tsd-chapters-in-eu-ftas-fig-leaf-or-necessary-tool-for-sdgs/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  14. Schmieg E (2018b) Labour clauses for sustainability? Colombian Trade Agreements Exemplify Potential and Limits. SWP Comment 15, April 2018. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2018C15_scm.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  15. Schmieg E, Rudloff B (2016) The future of the WTO after the Nairobi Ministerial Conference, SWP Comments 12. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik, Berlin. https://www.swp-berlin.org/fileadmin/contents/products/comments/2016C12_scm_rff.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019Google Scholar
  16. UN – United Nations (2015) Transforming our World: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1Google Scholar
  17. WTO – World Trade Organization (1995) General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS). https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/serv_e/gatsqa_e.htm#4. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  18. WTO – World Trade Organization (2015) International Trade Statistics 2015. WTO, Geneva. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/its2015_e/its2015_e.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zampetti AB (2011) Environment, social aspects and institutional provisions. In: Zampetti AB, Lodge J (eds) The CARIFORUM-EU Economic Partnership Agreement: a practitioners’ analysis. Kluwer Law International, Alphen aan den Rijn, pp 179–198Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.SWP – Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (German Institute for International and Security Affairs)BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations