Advertisement

Tools of Transformation: From Small Scale Progress to Structural Change

  • Guus ter HaarEmail author
  • Lucas Simons
Chapter
Part of the Natural Resource Management in Transition book series (NRMT, volume 2)

Abstract

As the preceding chapters should make clear, we are still far from anything resembling sustainable production and consumption of agricultural commodities. In spite of the growth of sustainability initiatives and tools such as Voluntary Sustainability Standards (VSS), and the certification schemes that drive their adoption, grave sustainability problems persist. How can this be? This chapter takes a step back, and asks why our current approaches to sustainability fail to have the impact we might expect—and should demand. It describes the unsustainable nature of our global food system, and how this is a logical outcome of the way this system is organised. A transition towards sustainable agricultural sectors, we argue, can only be successful if initiatives manage to affect the broader forces which shape agricultural sectors. Adopting a more comprehensive approach is the logical next step—and a critical one. Fundamental to this approach is the understanding that there is no single ‘silver bullet’ approach, but that instead the levers for change differ based on the dynamics of a sector, and that these also change based on the progress of the sector as a whole.

References

  1. Barbier EB, Hochard JP (2015) Geographical poverty traps in rural areas: a growing global problem. http://blogs.worldbank.org/developmenttalk/geographical-poverty-traps-rural-areas-growing-global-problem. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  2. Carter MR, Barrett CB (2006) The economics of poverty traps and persistent poverty: an asset-based approach. J Dev Stud 42(2):178–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dixon J, Gulliver A, Gibbon D (2001) Farming systems and poverty: improving farmers’ livelihoods in a changing world. Summary. FAO and World Bank, Rome and Washington, DC. http://www.fao.org/3/a-ac349e.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  4. Ecolabel Index (2019) Ecolabel Index – The global directory of ecolabels. http://www.ecolabelindex.com/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  5. FAO – Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2012) FAO statistical yearbook 2012: World Food and Agriculture. FAO, RomeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Fountain AC, Hütz-Adams F (2015) Cocoa Barometer 2015. USA Edition. http://www.cocoabarometer.org/Cocoa_Barometer/Download_files/Cocoa%20Barometer%202015%20USA.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  7. Garnett T, Godfray HCJ (2012) Sustainable intensification in agriculture. Navigating a course through competing food system priorities. Food Climate Research Network and the Oxford Martin Programme on the Future of Food, University of Oxford, UK. https://www.fcrn.org.uk/sites/default/files/SI_report_final.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  8. Giovannucci D (2008) How new agrifood standards are affecting trade. In: ITC – International Trade Centre (ed) Trade – what if? New challenges in export development: consumers, ethics and environment. International Trade Centre, Geneva, pp. 99–112Google Scholar
  9. GIZ – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH (2016) Voluntary Action for Climate-friendly Coffee from Costa Rica (NAMA). https://www.giz.de/en/worldwide/33738.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  10. Gorter J (2014) Sustainable Intensification at Scale. The New Agriculturist. http://www.new-ag.info/en/view/point.php?a=3163. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  11. IDH – The Sustainable Trade Initiative, True Price (2016) The True Price of Cocoa from Ivory Coast. True Price, Amsterdam. https://www.chocolatemakers.nl/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/TP-Cocoa.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  12. Intact (2017) The 2017 Global Sustainability Standards Conference in Review. http://www.intact-systems.com/news/2017-global-sustainability-standards-conference-review/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  13. Isbell F, Calcagno V, Hector A, Connolly J et al (2011) High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477:199–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ITC – International Trade Centre (2019) ITC Standards Map. https://sustainabilitymap.org/standard-identify. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  15. Lernoud J, Willer H (2016) Global survey on voluntary sustainability standards (VSS): key figures. Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL), Frick, Switzerland. http://orgprints.org/29790/7/lernoud-VSS-2016-02-10.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  16. Mackintosh C (2012) Hope for a new era: before/after examples of permaculture earth restoration – solving our problems from the ground up. Permaculture News, Permaculture Research Institute. https://permaculturenews.org/2012/06/28/hope-for-a-new-era-before-after-examples-of-permaculture-earth-restoration-solving-our-problems-from-the-ground-up/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  17. Molenaar JW, Dallinger J, Gorter J, Heilbron L, Simons L, Blackmore E, Vorley B (2015a) The role of voluntary sustainability standards in scaling up sustainability in smallholder-dominated agricultural sectors. White paper 4, commissioned by IFC, published by Aidenvironment, NewForesight and IIED. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16586IIED.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  18. Molenaar JW, Gorter J, Heilbron L, Simons L, Vorley B, Blackmore E, Dallinger J (2015b) Sustainable Sector Transformation: How to drive sustainability performance in smallholder-dominated agricultural sectors? White paper 1, commissioned by IFC, published by Aidenvironment, NewForesight and IIED. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/16584IIED.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  19. NCFH – National Center for Farmworker Health (2012) Child Labor in Agriculture. http://www.ncfh.org/uploads/3/8/6/8/38685499/fs-child_labor.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  20. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Hill SLL, Contuet S et al (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520:45–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Newbold T, Hudson LN, Arnell AP, Contuet S et al (2016) Has land use pushed terrestrial biodiversity beyond the planetary boundary? A global assessment. Science 353(6296):288–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. NewForesight (2013) Sustainable Intensification at Scale: A Framework for Strategy Design. http://www.newforesight.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Sustainable-Intensification-Model_here.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  23. NewForesight, Commonland (2017) New Horizons for the Transitioning of our Food System: Connecting Ecosystems, Value Chains and Consumers. Discussion paper by NewForesight and Commonland with contributions from The Boston Consulting Group. http://www.newforesight.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/New-horizons-for-transitioning-our-food-system-discussion-paper.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  24. Oliver TH, Isaac NJB, August TA, Woodcock BA, Roy DB, Bullock JM (2015) Declining resilience of ecosystem functions under biodiversity loss. Nat Commun 6:10122.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms10122
  25. Qian N (2015) Making progress on foreign aid. Annu Rev Econ 7(1):277–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Russell S (2014) Everything you need to know about agricultural emissions. World Resources Institute, Washington, DC. http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/05/everything-you-need-know-about-agricultural-emissions. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  27. Simons L (2014) Changing the food game. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Snider A, Kraus E, Sibelet N, Bosselmann AS, Faure G (2016) Influence of voluntary coffee certifications on cooperatives’ advisory services and agricultural practices of smallholder farmers in Costa Rica. J Agric Edu Ext 22(5):435–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Snider A, Gutiérrez I, Sibelet N, Faure G (2017) Small farmer cooperatives and voluntary coffee certifications: rewarding progressive farmers of engendering widespread change in Costa Rica? Food Policy 69:231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Tittonell P, Giller KE (2013) When yield gaps are poverty traps: the paradigm of ecological intensification in African smallholder agriculture. Field Crops Res 143:76–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. UN – United Nations (2015) Transforming our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015, A/RES/70/1Google Scholar
  32. UNDESA – United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2015) World population projected to reach 9.7 billion by 2050. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/news/population/2015-report.html. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  33. UNFSS – United Nations Forum on Sustainability Standards (2016) Meeting Sustainability Goals: Voluntary Sustainability Standards and the Role of the Government. 2nd Flagship Report of the United Nations Forum on Sustainability Standards (UNFSS). https://unfss.files.wordpress.com/2016/09/final_unfss-report_28092016.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  34. Vollaard B, van Monsjou W (2017) Spinning it around: investing in the business case for organic cotton producers in India. The Organic Cotton Accelerator, Utrecht. http://www.organiccottonaccelerator.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Article-OCA-Spinning-it-around.pdf. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  35. WCED – World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  36. World Bank (2007) Restoring China’s Loess Plateau. The World Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.worldbank.org/en/news/feature/2007/03/15/restoring-chinas-loess-plateau. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  37. World Bank (2018) Net official development assistance received (constant 2015 US$). The World Bank Databank. http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/DT.ODA.ODAT.KD. Accessed 31 Jan 2019
  38. WWF – World Wide Fund for Nature (2017) Environmental Impacts of Farming. http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/footprint/agriculture/impacts/. Accessed 31 Jan 2019

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NewForesightUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations