Motion Correction for Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced CMR Perfusion Images Using a Consecutive Finite Element Model Warping

  • Nils Noorman
  • James Small
  • Avan SuinesiaputraEmail author
  • Brett Cowan
  • Alistair A. Young
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8896)


We present results of a non-rigid registration algorithm to correct breathing motion in cardiac MR perfusion sequences applied to the STACOM 2014 Motion Correction Challenge dataset. The algorithm is based on the finite element method whereby a 2D free form deformation model is deformed to match image features. Image warping is performed through global-to-local mapping of motion parameters. To overcome the contrast intensity problem in the perfusion images, the registration was applied consecutively between adjacent frames. Eleven cases were provided by the challenge: Ten cases were ECG-gated MR perfusion images with rest and adenosine-induced stress series, while the last case was an ungated MR perfusion stress acquisition. The algorithm achieved good results in terms of modified Hausdorff distance: \(1.31\pm 0.93\) pixels (max: 6.5 pixel), horizontal shifting \(< 4.5\) pixels, and vertical shifting: \(< 4\) pixels. Moderate Jaccard index: \(0.57\pm 0.14\) was achieved.


Motion Correction Jaccard Index Adjacent Frame Canny Edge Detection Image Warping 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Canny, J.: A computational approach to edge detection. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 8(6), 679–698 (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coelho-Filho, O.R., Rickers, C., Kwong, R.Y., Jerosch-Herold, M.: MR myocardial perfusion imaging. Radiology 266(3), 701–715 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dubuisson, M.P., Jain, A.: A modified Hausdorff distance for object matching. In: Proceedings 12th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition - Conference A: Computer Vision & Image Processing, vol. 1, pp. 566–568 (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gupta, V., Kirişli, H.A., Hendriks, E.A., van der Geest, R.J., van de Giessen, M., Niessen, W., Reiber, J.H.C., Lelieveldt, B.P.F.: Cardiac MR perfusion image processing techniques: a survey. Med. Image Anal. 16(4), 767–785 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Li, B., Liu, Y., Occleshaw, C.J., Cowan, B.R., Young, A.A.: In-line automated tracking for ventricular function with magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging 3(8), 860–866 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Li, B., Young, A.A., Cowan, B.R.: GPU accelerated non-rigid registration for the evaluation of cardiac function. Med. Image Comput. Comput. Assist. Interv. 11(Pt 2), 880–887 (2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Press, W.H.: Numerical recipes in C: the art of scientific computing, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1992)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nils Noorman
    • 1
    • 2
  • James Small
    • 1
  • Avan Suinesiaputra
    • 1
    Email author
  • Brett Cowan
    • 1
  • Alistair A. Young
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anatomy with RadiologyUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.Biomedical NMR, Department of Biomedical EngineeringEindhoven University of TechnologyEindhovenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations