Advertisement

Basic Concepts of Ecology

  • Pratul Kumar Saraswati
  • M. S. Srinivasan
Chapter

Abstract

The principles of ecology are extended to paleontological records to decipher the paleoecology of fossil assemblages. Ecology and paleoecology are also the basis for paleoenvironmental interpretation. The fundamental approach to paleoecology is uniformitarian in nature. There can, however, be several lines of evidence in paleoecology, including genetics, taphonomy, paleobiogeochemistry and stable isotopes. The various ecologic aspects of oceanic environment are given and the major environmental factors controlling the distribution of organisms are explained in this chapter. It also introduces quantitative methods for expressing species’ richness, diversity and equitability of samples for ecological/paleoecological interpretation. A flow chart explains how microfossil-based “transfer functions” are developed to estimate sea-surface temperatures and sea level changes that have contributed significantly to quantifying paleoclimate.

Keywords

Paleoecology Diversity indices Transfer function TROX model Rarefaction 

References

  1. Allison PA, Wignall PB, Brett CE (1995) Paleo-oxygenation: effects and recognition. In: Bosence, DWJ, Allison, PA (eds) Marine palaeoenvironmental analysis from fossils. Geological Society London Special Publications. 83: 97–112Google Scholar
  2. Buzas MA, Hayek LC (1998) SHE analysis for biofacies identification. J Foraminifer Res 28:233–239Google Scholar
  3. Guiot J, de Vernal A (2007) Transfer functions: methods for quantitative paleoceanography based on microfossils. In: Hillaire-Marcel C, de Vernal A (eds) Proxies in Late Cenozoic Paleoceanography. Elsevier, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  4. Hammer O, Harper AT (2005a) Paleontological data analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Horton BP, Edwards RJ (2005) The application of local and regional transfer functions to the reconstruction of Holocene sea levels, north Norfolk, England. The Holocene 15:216–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Imbrie J, Kipp N (1971) A new micropaleontological method for quantitative paleoclimatology: application to a late Pleistocene Caribbean core. In: Turekian KK (ed) The Late Cenozoic glacial ages. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp 71–181Google Scholar
  7. Jorissen FJ, de Stigter HC, Widmark JGV (1995) A conceptual model explaining benthic foraminiferal microhabitats. Mar Micropaleontol 26:3–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Parker WC, Arnold AJ (2003) Quantitative methods of data analysis in foraminiferal ecology. In: Sen Gupta BK (ed) Modern foraminifera. Kluwer Academic, New York, pp 71–92Google Scholar
  9. Raup DM (1975) Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction. Paleobiology 1(4):333–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Van der Zwaan GJ, Duijnstee IAP, den Dulk M, Ernst SR, Jannink NT, Kouwenhoven TJ (1999) Benthic foraminifers: proxies or problems? A review of paleoecological concepts. Earth Sci Rev 46:213–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

  1. Gooday AJ (2003) Benthic foraminifera (Protista) as tools in deep water palaeoceanography: environmental influences on faunal characteristics. In: Southard AJ (ed) Advances in marine biology. Elsevier, Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  2. Hammer O, Harper AT (2005b) Paleontological data analysis. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Murray JW (2006) Ecology and applications of benthic foraminifera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pratul Kumar Saraswati
    • 1
  • M. S. Srinivasan
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Earth SciencesIndian Institute of Technology BombayMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeologyBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia

Personalised recommendations