Adoption of Innovation: Balancing Internal and External Stakeholders in the Marketing of Innovation
In recent years, innovation management has shown to be a very important topic for academics and professionals. However, the emphasis has mostly been on the upstream activities of the innovation management process and specifically about how to obtain as well as to integrate new sources of innovation beyond the traditional and internal R&D function. Conversely, the downstream activities of the innovation process, specifically marketing and commercialization, have attracted little research. But the situation is changing now due to governments and companies that have realized that in order for an innovation to be successful, it is not enough to have good new ideas: it must foremost be adopted by the market. As a consequence, there is currently a shift in priorities and a renewed interest in the marketing of innovation and especially in the adoption of original products or services, because one important function of marketing is to contribute to the adoption of innovative solutions by potential customers. This book aims to contribute to this advancement and to provide fresh conceptual insights and thinking about the manners to stimulate and to facilitate the adoption of every kind of innovation. This will be managed by a very diverse contributions exploring the role and the balancing of internal and external stakeholders in the marketing of innovation.
KeywordsCloud Computing Innovation Process Open Innovation Absorptive Capacity Innovation Management
We thank Prashanth Mahagaonkar from Springer for his invaluable and encouraging support. Moreover, we thank explicitly all authors for their high commitment to this book project.
- Afonso, O., Monteiro, S., & Thompson, M. (2010). A growth model for the quadruple helix innovation theory. FEP Working papers no. 370. Porto: University of Porto.Google Scholar
- Bilgram, V. (2013). Performance assessment of co-creation initiatives: A conceptual framework for measuring the value of idea contests. In A. Brem & É. Viardot (Eds.), Evolution of innovation management: Trends in an international context. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2006). Knowledge creation, diffusion and use in innovation networks and knowledge clusters. A comparative system approach across the United States, Europe and Asia (pp. ix–xxvi). Westport, Connecticut: Praeger.Google Scholar
- Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
- Curley, M., & Salmelin, B. (2013). Dublin Declaration in Open Innovation 2.0, Conference Dublin, May 20–21 2013. Retrieved September 18, from www.slideshare.net/DCSF/martin-curley-closing-final
- Kim, W., Andrew, T., Hadi, Z., & Eugene, F. (2014). The most innovative companies 2014: Breaking through is hard to do. BCG. Perspectives. Retrieved November 4, 2014, from https://www.bcgperspectives.com/Images/Most_Innovative_Companies_2014_Oct_2014_tcm80-174313.pdf
- McCarthy. Ian P: (2014). User innovation and the role of creative consumers. International Journal of Technology Marketing, 9(1), 1–5.Google Scholar
- Pfeffermann, N., Minshall, T., & Mortara, L. (2014). Strategy and communication for innovation (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Salmelin, B. (2013). Innovation in Horizon 2020 – Reflections from Open Innovation 2.0 paradigm, Open Innovation 2.0 Conference, Brussels, November 28, 2013. Retrieved September 17, 2014, from www.euris-programme.eu/
- Sawhney, M., & Nambisan, S. (2007). The global brain: Your roadmap for innovating faster and smarter in a networked world. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing.Google Scholar
- Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualisation, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar