Language Diversity and New Media: Issues of Multimodality and Performance

  • George GadanidisEmail author
  • Marcelo Borba
  • Ricardo Scucuglia
Part of the New ICMI Study Series book series (NISS)


Language diversity in mathematics education is generally concerned with “multiple language use, learning through second or additional languages, learning through minority or oppressed languages, or through majority or dominant languages” (ICMI Study 21 Discussion document—see Appendix). For example, one issue in language diversity is the hegemonic role played by English in many countries to displace mother tongue education (Kirkpatrick, 2007; Phillipson, 2009). In this chapter, we take up the suggestion made by Marilyn Martin-Jones during the plenary of the ICMI Study 21 conference that future issues on language diversity need to be concerned with the use of digital media, and we explore the relationship between language diversity and new media.


Mathematics Classroom Mathematical Idea Wide Audience Language Diversity Visceral Sensation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Boal, A. (1985). Theatre of the oppressed (C. A. McBride & M.-O. Leal McBride, Trans.). New York: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
  2. Boorstin, J. (1990). The Hollywood eye: What makes movies work. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  3. Borba, M. C. (2009). Potential scenarios for Internet use in the mathematics classroom. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 41(4), 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borba, M. C., & Confrey, J. (1996). A student’s construction of transformations of functions in a multiple representational environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 31, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Borba, M., & Villarreal, M. E. (2005). Humans-with-media and the reorganization of mathematical thinking. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruner, J. (1994). Acts of meaning: Four lectures on mind and culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Buckingham, D. (2010). Media education: Literacy, learning and contemporary culture. Malden, MA: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Cummins, J., Brown, K., & Sayers, D. (2007). Literacy, technology, and diversity. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  10. Denzin, N. K. (2003). Performance ethnography. Critical pedagogy and the politics of culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Gadanidis, G. (2008). Scruffy’s new home. Whitby, ON: Brainy Day.Google Scholar
  12. Gadanidis, G. (2012). Trigonometry in grade 3? What works? Research into practice (Research Monograph 42). Ottawa, ON: The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat.Google Scholar
  13. Gadanidis, G., & Borba, M. (2008). Our lives as performance mathematicians. For the Learning of Mathematics, 28(1), 42–49.Google Scholar
  14. Gadanidis, G., & Gadanidis, M. (2010). Wolf gets hurt. Whitby, ON: Brainy Day.Google Scholar
  15. Gadanidis, G., Hoogland, C., & Hughes, J. (2008). Teaching and learning in a Web 2.0 environment: Three case studies. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 4(2), 117–133.Google Scholar
  16. Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J., & Borba, M. (2008). Students as performance mathematicians. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 14(3), 168–175.Google Scholar
  17. Gadanidis, G., Hughes, J., & Cordy, M. (2011). Mathematics for gifted students in an arts- and technology-rich setting. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(3), 397–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerofsky, S. (2006). Performance space & time. In G. Gadanidis & C. Hoogland (Eds.), Digital Mathematical Performance: Proceedings of a Fields Institute Symposium. London, ON: The University of Western Ontario.Google Scholar
  19. Hill, R. T. G. (1998). Performance pedagogy across the curriculum. In S. J. Daily (Ed.), The future of performance studies: Visions and revisions (pp. 141–144). Washington, DC: National Communication Association.Google Scholar
  20. Hughes, J. (2008). The performative pull of research with new media. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 7(3), 16–34.Google Scholar
  21. Hughes, J., & Gadanidis, G. (2010). Learning as community service: Thinking with new media. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 19(3), 287–306.Google Scholar
  22. Hull, G. A. (2003). At last: Youth culture and digital media: New literacies for new times. Research in the Teaching of English, 38(2), 229–233.Google Scholar
  23. Hull, G. A., & Katz, M. (2006). Creating an agentive self: Case studies of digital storytelling. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(1), 43–81.Google Scholar
  24. Hutchins, P. (1986). The doorbell rang. New York: Mulberry Books.Google Scholar
  25. Kieran, C. (1992). The learning and teaching of school algebra. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 390–419). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Kieran, C., & Guzmán, J. (2009). Developing teacher awareness of the roles of technology and novel tasks: An example involving proofs and proving in high school algebra. In M. Tzekaki, M. Kaldrimidou, & H. Sakonidis (Eds.), Proceedings of the 33rd Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (PME) (pp. 321–328). Thessaloniki, Greece: PME.Google Scholar
  27. Kieran, C., & Sfard, A. (1999). Seeing through symbols: The case of equivalent expressions. Focus on Learning Problems in Mathematics, 21(1), 1–17.Google Scholar
  28. Kirkpatrick, A. (2007). World Englishes: Implications for international communication and English language teaching. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2006). New literacies: Everyday practices and classroom learning (2nd ed.). London: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2007). Sampling “the new” in new literacies. In M. Knobel & C. Lankshear (Eds.), A new literacies sampler (pp. 1–24). New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  32. Levy, P. (1993). Tecnologias da Inteligência: O futuro do pensamento na era da informática. [Technologies of intelligence: The future of thinking in the informatics era]. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Editora 34.Google Scholar
  33. Levy, P. (1998). Becoming virtual: Reality in the digital age. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  34. McIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  35. McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: The extensions of man. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  36. Miller, P., & Goodnow, J. (1995). Cultural practices: Toward an integration of culture and development. New Directions for Child Development, 67, 5–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nathan, M. J., & Koedinger, K. R. (2000). An investigation of teachers’ beliefs of students’ algebra development. Cognition and Instruction, 18(2), 209–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Noss, R., Hoyles, C., Geraniou, E., Mavrikis, M., Gutierrez, S., & Pearce, D. (2009). Broadening the sense of ‘dynamic’: An exploratory system to support students’ mathematical generalisation. Zentralblatt für Didaktik der Mathematik, 41(4), 493–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ochs, E., & Capps, L. (2001). Living narrative: Creating lives in everyday storytelling. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pahl, K., & Rowsell, J. (2005). Literacy and education: Understanding the new literacy studies in the classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Phillipson, R. (2009). Linguistic imperialism continued. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Rowsell, J., & Walsh, M. (2011). Rethinking literacy education in new times: Multimodality, multiliteracies and new literacies. Brock Education, 21(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
  43. Schank, R. (1990). Tell me a story: A new look at real and artificial memory. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  44. Schrage, M. (2001). The relationship revolution. Retrieved from
  45. Scucuglia, R. (2012). On the nature of students’ digital mathematical performances. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Western Ontario, Canada.Google Scholar
  46. Scucuglia, R., & Gadanidis, G. (2013). Performance matemática: Tecnologias digitais e artes na escola pública de ensino fundamental [Mathematical performance: Digital technology and the arts at the elementary public school]. In M. Borba & A. Chiari (Eds.), Tecnologias digitais e educação matemática [Digital technology and mathematics education]. São Paulo, Brazil: Editora Livraria da Física.Google Scholar
  47. Sinclair, N. (2006). The aesthetic sensibilities of mathematicians. In N. Sinclair, D. Pimm, & W. Higginson (Eds.), Mathematics and the aesthetic: Modern approaches to an ancient affinity (pp. 87–104). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. The New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tikhomirov, O. K. (1981). The psychological consequences of computerization. In J. Wertsch (Ed.), The concept of activity in Soviet psychology (pp. 256–278). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  50. Walsh, M. (2011). Multimodal literacy: Researching classroom practice. Sydney, Australia: Primary Teachers Association of Australia.Google Scholar
  51. Watson, A., & Mason, J. (2007). Surprise and inspiration. Mathematics Teaching, 200, 4–7.Google Scholar
  52. Weber, S., & Mitchell, C. (2008). Imaging, keyboarding, and posting identities: Young people and new media technologies. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), Youth, identity and digital media (pp. 25–47). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • George Gadanidis
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marcelo Borba
    • 2
  • Ricardo Scucuglia
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of EducationUniversity of Western OntarioLondonCanada
  2. 2.Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Sao Jose Rio PretoBrazil

Personalised recommendations