A Cloudification Methodology for Numerical Simulations

  • Silvina Caíno-Lores
  • Alberto García
  • Félix García-Carballeira
  • Jesús Carretero
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8806)


Many scientific areas make extensive use of computer simulations to study complex real-world processes. These computations are typically very resource-intensive and present scalability issues as experiments get larger, even in dedicated clusters since they are limited by their own hardware resources. Cloud computing raises as an option to move forward into the ideal unlimited scalability by providing virtually infinite resources, yet applications must be adapted to this new paradigm. We propose a generalist cloudification method based in the MapReduce paradigm to migrate numerical simulations into the cloud to provide greater scalability. We analysed its viability by applying it to a real-world simulation and running the resulting implementation on Hadoop YARN over Amazons EC2. Our tests show that the cloudified application is highly scalable and there is still a large margin to improve the theoretical model and its implementations, and also to extend it to a wider range of simulations.


Cloud Computing Overhead Line MapReduce Framework Kernel Execution Hadoop MapReduce 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ashby, S., Beckman, P., Chen, J., Colella, P., Collins, B., Crawford, D., Dongarra, J., Kothe, D., Lusk, R., Messina, P.: et al.: The opportunities and challenges of exascale computing. Summary Report of the Advanced Scientific Computing Advisory Committee (ASCAC) Subcommittee (November 2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bergman, K., Borkar, S., Campbell, D., Carlson, W., Dally, W., Denneau, M., Franzon, P., Harrod, W., Hill, K., Hiller, J., et al.: Exascale computing study: Technology challenges in achieving exascale systems. Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency Information Processing Techniques Office (DARPA IPTO), Tech. Rep 15 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Casanova, H., Legrand, A., Zagorodnov, D., Berman, F.: Heuristics for scheduling parameter sweep applications in grid environments. In: Proceedings of the 9th Heterogeneous Computing Workshop (HCW 2000), pp. 349–363. IEEE (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Angelo, G.: Parallel and distributed simulation from many cores to the public cloud. In: 2011 International Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation (HPCS), pp. 14–23 (July 2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dean, J., Ghemawat, S.: Mapreduce: simplified data processing on large clusters. Communications of the ACM 51(1), 107–113 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ekanayake, J., Pallickara, S., Fox, G.: Mapreduce for data intensive scientific analyses. In: IEEE Fourth International Conference on eScience 2008, pp. 277–284 (December 2008)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grozev, N., Buyya, R.: Inter-cloud architectures and application brokering: taxonomy and survey. Software: Practice and Experience (2012)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gunarathne, T., Wu, T.L., Qiu, J., Fox, G.: Mapreduce in the clouds for science. In: 2010 IEEE Second International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), pp. 565–572 (November 2010) Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hill, Z., Humphrey, M.: A quantitative analysis of high performance computing with amazon’s ec2 infrastructure: The death of the local cluster? In: 2009 10th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Grid Computing, pp. 26–33 (October 2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Juve, G., Deelman, E., Vahi, K., Mehta, G., Berriman, B., Berman, B., Maechling, P.: Scientific workflow applications on amazon ec2. In: 2009 5th IEEE International Conference on E-Science Workshops, pp. 59–66 (December 2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mell, P., Grance, T.: The nist definition of cloud computing. National Institute of Standards and Technology 53(6), 50 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Petcu, D., Macariu, G., Panica, S., Crăciun, C.: Portable cloud applications—from theory to practice. Future Generation Computer Systems 29(6), 1417–1430 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Srirama, S.N., Jakovits, P., Vainikko, E.: Adapting scientific computing problems to clouds using mapreduce. Future Generation Computer Systems 28(1), 184–192 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Srirama, S.N., Ivanistsev, V., Jakovits, P., Willmore, C.: Direct migration of scientific computing experiments to the cloud. In: 2013 International Conference on High Performance Computing and Simulation (HPCS), pp. 27–34 (July 2013)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Yelick, K., Coghlan, S., Draney, B., Canon, R.S., et al.: The magellan report on cloud computing for science. US Department of Energy, Washington DC, USA, Tech. Rep. (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Silvina Caíno-Lores
    • 1
  • Alberto García
    • 1
  • Félix García-Carballeira
    • 1
  • Jesús Carretero
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Computer Architecture GroupUniversidad Carlos III de MadridLeganésSpain

Personalised recommendations