Finite Temperature Matrix Product State Algorithms and Applications

  • Michael L. Wall
Part of the Springer Theses book series (Springer Theses)

Abstract

We review the basic theory of matrix product states (MPS) as a numerical variational ansatz for time evolution, and present two methods to simulate finite temperature systems with MPS: the ancilla method and the minimally entangled typical thermal state (METTS) method. A sample calculation with the Bose–Hubbard model is provided.

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge useful discussions with Juan José García Ripoll and Miles Stoudenmire. This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant PHY-0903457. MLW thanks the Boulder Summer School for Condensed Matter for stimulating discussions. We also acknowledge the Golden Energy Computing Organization at the Colorado School of Mines for the use of resources acquired with financial assistance from the National Science Foundation and the National Renewable Energy Laboratories.

References

  1. 1.
    White, S.R.: Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2863 (1992)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Klumper, A., Schadschneider, A., Zittartz, J.: Equivalence and solution of anisotropic spin-1 models and generalized t-J fermion models in one dimension. J. Phys. A 24, L955 (1991)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fannes, M., Nachtergaele, B., Werner, R.F.: Finitely correlated states on quantum spin chains. Commun. Math. Phys. 144, 443 (1992)CrossRefADSMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Östlund, S., Rommer, S.: Thermodynamic limit of density matrix renormalization. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3537 (1995)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rommer, S., Östlund, S.: Class of ansatz wave functions for one-dimensional spin systems and their relation to the density matrix renormalization group. Phys. Rev. B 55, 2164 (1997)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vidal, G.: Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daley, A.J., Kollath, C., Schollwöck, U., Vidal, G.: Time-dependent density-matrix renormalization-group using adaptive effective Hilbert spaces. J. Stat. Mech. 2004, P04005 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Verstraete, F., Porras, D., Cirac, J.I.: Density matrix renormalization group and periodic boundary conditions: A quantum information perspective. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 227205 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Verstraete, F., García-Ripoll, J.J., Cirac, J.I.: Matrix product density operators: Simulation of finite-temperature and dissipative systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207204 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zwolak, M., Vidal, G.: Mixed-state dynamics in one-dimensional quantum lattice systems: A time-dependent superoperator renormalization algorithm. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 207205 (2004)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Perez-Garcia, D., Verstraete, F., WolF, M.M., Cirac, J.I.: Matrix product state representations. Quantum Inf. Comput. 7, 401 (2007)MATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Verstraete, F., Cirac, J.I.: Matrix product states represent ground states faithfully. Phys. Rev. B 73, 094423 (2006)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pippan, P., White, S.R., Evertz, H.G.: Efficient matrix-product state method for periodic boundary conditions. Phys. Rev. B 81, 081103 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pirvu, B., Murg, V., Cirac, J.I., Verstraete, F.: Matrix product operator representations. New J. Phys. 12, 025012 (2010)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    McCulloch, I.P.: From density-matrix renormalization group to matrix product states. J. Stat. Mech. 2007, P10014 (2007)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stoudenmire, E.M., White, S.R.: Minimally entangled typical thermal state algorithms. New J. Phys. 12, 055026 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    García-Ripoll, J.J.: Time evolution of matrix product states. New J. Phys. 8, 305 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feiguin, A.E., White, S.R.: Finite-temperature density matrix renormalization using an enlarged Hilbert space. Phys. Rev. B 72, 220401 (2005)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Nielsen, M., Chuang, I.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2000)MATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    White, S.R.: Minimally entangled typical quantum states at finite temperature. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 190601 (2009)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vidal, G.: Efficient classical simulation of slightly entangled quantum computations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 147902 (2003)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Feiguin, A.E., Fiete, G.A.: Spectral properties of a spin-incoherent Luttinger liquid. Phys. Rev. B 81, 075108 (2010)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Liang, S., Pang, H.: Approximate diagonalization using the density matrix renormalization-group method: A two-dimensional-systems perspective. Phys. Rev. B 49, 9214 (1994)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    White, S.R., Scalapino, D.J.: Pairing on striped tt′ − J lattices. Phys. Rev. B 79, 220504 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Verstraete, F., Cirac, J.I.: Renormalization algorithms for quantum many-body systems in two and higher dimensions (2004) [arXiv:cond-mat/0407066v1]Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Schuch, N., Wolf, M.M., Verstraete, F., Cirac, J.I.: Simulation of quantum many-body systems with strings of operators and monte carlo tensor contractions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 040501 (2008)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Evenbly, G., Vidal, G.: Entanglement renormalization in two spatial dimensions. Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 180406 (2009)CrossRefADSGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael L. Wall
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Colorado School of MinesGoldenUSA
  2. 2.JILA, NIST, and University of ColoradoBoulderUSA

Personalised recommendations