Portable Optically Tracked Ultrasound System for Scoliosis Measurement
Monitoring spinal curvature in adolescent kyphoscoliosis requires regular radiographic examinations; however, the applied ionizing radiation increases the risk of cancer. Ultrasound imaging is favorable over X-ray because it does not emit ionizing radiation. It has been shown in the past that tracked ultrasound can be used to localize vertebral transverse processes as landmarks along the spine to measure curvature angles. Tests have been performed with spine phantoms, but scanning protocol, tracking system, data acquisition and processing time has not been considered in human subjects yet. In this paper, a portable optically tracked ultrasound system for scoliosis measurement is presented. It provides a simple way to acquire data in the clinical environment with the aim of comparing results to current X-ray-based measurement. The workflow of the procedure was tested on volunteers. The customized open-source software is shared with the community as part of our effort to make a clinically practical system.
KeywordsAdolescent idiopathic kyphoscoliosis Scoliosis Kyphosis Tracked sonography Tracked ultrasound snapshot
This work was supported in part by the Canada-Latin America Research Exchange Grant (LACREG) program. Comision Sectorial de Investigacion Cientıfica (CSIC, Universidad de la Republica, Uruguay) supported the internship of G. Carbajal at Perklab.
- 3.Wong, H.K., Hui, J.H., Rajan, U., Chia, H.P.: Idiopathic scoliosis in Singapore schoolchildren: a prevalence study 15 years into the screening program. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 30(10), 1188–96 (2005)Google Scholar
- 4.Ward, K., Ogilvie, J.W., Singleton, M.V., Chettier, R., Engler, G., Nelson, L.M.: Validation of DNA-based prognostic testing to predict spinal curve progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 35(25), E1455–64 (2010)Google Scholar
- 6.Doody, M.M., Lonstein, J.E., Stovall, M., Hacker, D.G., Luckyanov, N., Land, C.E.: Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: findings from the U.S. Scoliosis Cohort study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 25(16), 2052–63 (2000)Google Scholar
- 9.Diefenbach, C., Lonner, B.S., Auerbach, J.D., Bharucha, N., Dean, L.E.: Is radiation-free diagnostic monitoring of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis feasible using upright positional magnetic resonance imaging? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 38(7), 576–80 (2013)Google Scholar
- 10.Goldberg, C.J., Kaliszer, M., Moore, D.P., Fogarty, E.E., Dowling, F.E.: Surface topography, Cobb angles, and cosmetic change in scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 26(4), E55–63 (2001)Google Scholar
- 12.Suzuki, S., Yamamuro, T., Shikata, J., Shimizu, K., Iida, H.: Ultrasound measurement of vertebral rotation in idiopathic scoliosis. J. Bone Jt. Surg. Br. 71(2), 252–255 (1989)Google Scholar
- 13.Li, M., Cheng, J., Ying, M., Ng, B., Zheng, Y.P., Lam, T.P., Wong, W.Y., Wong, M.S.: Application of 3-D ultrasound in assisting the fitting procedure of spinal orthosis to patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 158, 34–37 (2010)Google Scholar
- 14.Chen, W., Lou, E.H., Le, L.H.: Using ultrasound imaging to identify landmarks in vertebra models to assess spinal deformity. Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011, 8495–8498 (2011)Google Scholar
- 15.Purnama, K.E., Wilkinson, M.H., Veldhuizen, A.G., van Ooijen, P.M., Lubbers, J., Burgerhof, J.G., Sardjono, T.A., Verkerke, G.J.: A framework for human spine imaging using a freehand 3D ultrasound system. Technol. Health Care 18(1), 1–17 (2010)Google Scholar
- 19.Lasso, A., Heffter, T., Rankin, A., Pinter, C., Ungi, T., Fichtinger, G.: PLUS: open-source toolkit for ultrasound-guided intervention systems. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. (In press)Google Scholar
- 20.Tokuda, J., Fischer, G.S., Papademetris, X., Yaniv, Z., Ibanez, L., Cheng, P., Liu, H., Blevins, J., Arata, J., Golby, A.J., Kapur, T., Pieper, S., Burdette, E.C., Fichtinger, G., Tempany, C.M., Hata, N.: OpenIGTLink: an open network protocol for image-guided therapy environment. Int. J. Med. Robot. 5(4), 423–434 (2009)Google Scholar