Abstract

The complexities of the many concepts and models around information literacy are considered, and some personal views given as to how they may best be clarified, both theoretically and practically. A slightly adapted idea of the concept of information fluency can serve as a main general purpose for the promotion of information literacy, expressed as a more specific meta-model for the prevailing technological environment, and as still more specific components for a particular context. The focus of this relatively stable general formulation is on understanding, rather than skills or competences. It can incorporate the need for education, advice and counseling, as well as information provision, and with domain-specific literacies, as well as supporting personal information literacy.

Keywords

Information literacy models digital literacy information fluency domains 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bawden, D.: Information and Digital Literacies; a Review of Concepts. J. Doc. 57(2), 218–259 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bawden, D.: Origins and Concepts of Digital Literacy. In: Lankshear, C., Knobel, M. (eds.) Digital Literacies Concepts, Policies and Practices, pp. 17–32. Peter Lang, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Addison, C., Meyers, E.: Perspectives on Information Literacy: a Framework for Conceptual Understanding. Inf. Res. 18(3), paper C27 (2013), http://www.informationr.net/ir/183/colis/paperC27.html
  4. 4.
    Mackey, T.P., Jacobsen, T.E.: Metaliteracy: Reinventing Information Literacy to Empower Learners. Facet, London (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Stordy, P.: Taxonomy of Literacies. J. Doc. 71(3) ( in press, 2014)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tolkien, J.R.R.: The Lord of the Rings. George Allen and Unwin, London (1968)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Martin, W.: Literacies for the Digital Age. In: Martin, A., Madigan, D. (eds.) Digital Literacies for Learning, pp. 3–25. Facet, London (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pisanski, J., Žumer, M.: User Verification of the FRBR Conceptual Model. J. Doc. 68(4), 582–592 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gilster, P.: Digital Literacy. Wiley, New York (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lloyd, A.: Information Literacy: The Meta-competency of the Knowledge Economy? An Exploratory Paper. J. Lib. Info. Sci. 57(2), 87–92 (2003)MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Robinson, L.: Immersive, Pervasive, Multi-sensory, Unreal: Towards a New Generation of Documents. JASIST (in press, 2014)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Robinson, L.: Immersive Information Behaviour; Using the Documents of the Future. New Lib. World (in press, 2014)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Committee on Information Technology Literacy, National Research Council: Being Fluent with Information Technology. National Academy Press, Washington DC (1999)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Butterworth, K., Allam, O., Gray, A., Butterworth, H.: Providing Confusion: The Need for Education not Information in Chronic Care. J. Health Informat 18(2), 111–123 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Niedzwiedzka, B., Mazzocchi, M., Aschemann-Witzel, J., Gennaro, L., Verbeke, W., Traill, W.B.: Determinants of Information Behaviour and Information Literacy Related to Healthy Eating and Internet Users in Five European Countries. Inf. Res. 19(3), paper 633 (2014), http://www.informationr.net/ir/19-3/paper633.html
  16. 16.
    Cowan, S.M.: Information Literacy: The Battle We Won That We Lost? Portal: Lib. and the Acad. 14(1), 23–32 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pinto, M., Pulgarin, A., Escalona, M.: Viewing Information Literacy Concepts: A Comparison of Two Branches of Knowledge. Scientometrics 98(3), 231–232 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thompson, G.B., Lathey, J.W.: An Integrated Model of Information Literacy, Based Upon Domain Learning. Information Research 18(3), paper C02 (2013), http://www.informationr.net/ir/18-3/colis/paperC02.html
  19. 19.
    Bawden, D., Robinson, L.: No Such Thing as Society? On the Individuality of Information Behaviour. JASIST 64(12), 2587–2590 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sundin, O.: Negotiations on Information-seeking Expertise: A Study of Web-based Tutorials for Information Literacy. J. Doc. 64(1), 24–44 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pilerot, O., Lindberg, J.: The Concept of Information Literacy in Policy-making Texts: An Imperialistic Project? Lib. Trends 60(2), 338–360 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lloyd, A., Bonner, A., Dawson-Rose, C.: The Health Information Practices of People Living with Chronic Health Conditions: Implications for Health Literacy. J. Lib. Info. Sci. 46(3), 207–216 (2014)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bawden, D., Robinson, L.: Individual Differences in Information-related Behaviour: What Do We Know about Information Styles. In: Spink, A., Heinström, J. (eds.) New Directions in Information Behaviour, pp. 282–300. Emerald, Bingley (2011)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jones, W.: Building a Better World with Our Information: The Future of Personal Information Management. Morgan Claypool, San Raphael (2014)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bruce, C.: Portrait of an Information Literate Person. HERDSA News 16(3), 9–11 (1994)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Tolkien, J.R.R.: The Hobbit. George Allen and Unwin, London (1966)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Bawden
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Library and Information ScienceCity University LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations