Advertisement

Revenge and Conflict: Social and Cognitive Aspects

  • Francesca GiardiniEmail author
  • Rosaria Conte
Chapter
Part of the Computational Social Sciences book series (CSS)

Abstract

Revenge can be conceptualized as an attempt to restore the power balance destroyed by an aggression. It can be risky and costly for the individuals, and it can become completely disruptive at the social and societal level. At the individual level, revenge implies the risk of a counterattack, either coming from the target or from his or her kin and relatives, and it is costly because of the effort it requires. At the social level, a likely and dangerous consequence of revenge is the emergence of feuds, with whole families and groups fighting against each other. Moreover, material resources can get wasted in the conflict, thus further increasing the costs of revenge. Even so, revenge is still part of our behavioral repertoire, humans take revenge continuously, both at a small and at a larger scale. How could have revenge survived if it is costly and dysfunctional? Why do humans still resort to revenge when reacting to a wrong suffered?

The aim of this chapter is to apply cognitive analysis in order to unveil the tension between a need for equity restoration and the related dangers, showing that revenge exploits other social mechanisms, like fairness and equity restoration. We will go through the motivations of an avenger, and we will bridge individual and social factors in order to understand the complex relationship between individuals’ motivations to take revenge and the constraints imposed by societies. We posit that revenge had to be restrained by societies in order to prevent conflicts, and this was done by limiting the contexts in which revenge may take place, thus transforming it into an institution in which revenge is regulated (e.g., Kanun in Albania), or promoting alternative ways of reacting, like punishment and sanction.

Keywords

Revenge Cognitive analysis Retribution Psychological motives Social order Feud Social damage 

References

  1. Andrighetto G, Conte R, Giardini F (2012a) Institutions evolving through the mind. A cognitive and computational approach. In: Paglieri F, Tummolini L, Falcone R, Miceli M (eds) The goals of cognition. Essays in honor of Cristiano Castelfranchi. College Publications, London, pp345–378Google Scholar
  2. Andrighetto G, Giardini F, Conte R (2012b). An evolutionary account of reactions to a wrong. COGSCI 2013 - 35th annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Berlin, July 31–August 3 2013. Proceedings, Cognitive Science Society, 2013, pp 1756–1761Google Scholar
  3. Barash DP, Lipton JE (2011) Payback: why we retaliate, redirect aggression and seek revenge. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. Baumeister RF (1997) Evil: inside human cruelty and violence. Freeman, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker GS (1968) Crime and punishment: an economic approach. J Polit Econ 76:169–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentham J (1962) Principles of penal law. In: Bowring J (ed) The works of Jeremy Bentham. Russell and Russell, New York, pp 365–580Google Scholar
  7. Boehm C (1984) Blood revenge: the enactment and management of conflict in Montenegro and other tribal societies. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar
  8. Brosnan SF (2011) A hypothesis of the co-evolution of inequity and cooperation. Front Neurosci 5:43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brosnan SF (2013) Justice- and fairness-related behaviors in nonhuman primates. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110(Suppl 2):10416–10423Google Scholar
  10. Brosnan SF, Freeman C, De Waal FBM (2006) Partner’s behavior, not reward distribution, determines success in an unequal cooperative task in capuchin monkeys. Am J Primatol 68(7):713–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Buss DM (1988) From vigilance to violence: tactics of mate retention in american undergraduates. Ethol Sociobiol 9:291–317Google Scholar
  12. Buss DM, Shackelford TK (1997) From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples. J Pers Soc Psychol 72:346–361Google Scholar
  13. Carlsmith KM, Wilson TD, Gilbert DT (2008) The paradoxical consequences of revenge. J Pers Soc Psychol 95:1316–1324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chagnon N (1988) Life histories, blood revenge, and warfare in a tribal population. Science 239:985–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chagnon N (2013) Noble savages: my life among two dangerous tribes – the Yanomamo and the anthropologists. Simon and Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock TH, Parker GA (1995) Punishment in animal societies. Nature 373:209–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen D (1996) Law, social policy, and violence: the impact of regional cultures. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:961–978CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen D, Nisbett RE (1994) Self-protection and the culture of honor: explaining southern homicide. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 20:551–567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen D, Nisbett RE (1997) Field experiments examining the culture of honor: the role of institutions in perpetuating norms about violence. Pers Soc Psychol Bull 23:1188–1199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cohen D, Nisbett RE, Bowdle BF, Schwartz N (1996) Insult, aggression, and the southern culture of honor: an “experimental ethnography”. J Pers Soc Psychol 70:945–960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Daly M, Wilson M (1988) Homicide. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne, NYGoogle Scholar
  22. De Quervain DJF, Fischbacher U, Treyer V, Schellhammer M, Schnyder U, Buck A, Fehr E (2004) The neural basis of altruistic punishment. Science 305:1254–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Elster J (1990) Norms of revenge. Ethics 100(4):862–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fehr E, Gachter S (2000) Cooperation and punishment in Public Goods Experiments. Am Econ Rev 90:980–994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fehr E, Gachter S (2002) Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fehr E, Schmidt KM (1999) A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. Quart J Econ 114:817–868CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Flinn MV (1988) Mate guarding in a Caribbean village. Ethol Sociobiol 9:1–28Google Scholar
  28. Frank RH (1988) Passions within reason: the strategic role of the emotions. Norton, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  29. French PA (2001) The virtues of vengeance. The University Press of Kansas, KansasGoogle Scholar
  30. Frijda NH (1994) The Lex Talionis: on vengeance. In: van Goozen SHM, van der Poll NE, Sergeant JA (eds) Emotions: essays on emotion theory. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp 263–289Google Scholar
  31. Gardner A, West SA (2004) Cooperation and punishment, especially in humans. Am Nat 164:753–764CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Giardini F, Andrighetto G, Conte R (2010) A cognitive model of punishment, Proceedings of the 32nd annual conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, pp 1282–1288Google Scholar
  33. Gjeov S (1989) Kanuni i leke dukagjinit. Albanian text collected and arranged by Shtjefn Gjeov. Gjonlekaj Publishing Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  34. Gollwitzer M, Denzler M (2009) What makes revenge sweet: seeing the offender suffer or delivering a message? J Exp Soc Psychol 45:840–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gould RV (2003) Collision of Wills: how ambiguity about social rank breeds conflict. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Hafer C, Bègue L (2005) Experimental research on just-world theory: problems, developments, and future challenges. Psychol Bull 131(1):128–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Henrich J, Boyd R (2001) Why people punish defectors. Weak conformist transmission can stabilize costly enforcement of norms in cooperative dilemmas. J Theor Biol 208:79–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Henrich J, McElreath R, Barr A, Ensminger J, Barrett C, Bolyanatz A et al (2006) Costly punishment across human societies. Science 312(5781):1767–1770CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jacoby S (1983) Wild justice: the evolution of revenge. Harper & Row, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Jensen K (2010) Punishment and spite, the dark side of cooperation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:2635–2650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jensen K, Call J, Tomasello M (2007) Chimpanzees are vengeful but not spiteful. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:13046–13050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Karremans JC, Van Lange PAM, Ouwerkerk JW, Kluwer ES (2003) When forgiving enhances psychological well being: the role of interpersonal commitment. J Pers Soc Psychol 84:1011–1026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kelsen H (1943) Society and nature. A sociological inquiry. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  44. Kim SH, Smith RH (1993) Revenge and conflict escalation. Negotiation J 9:37–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lerner MJ (1977) The justice motive: some hypotheses as to its origins and forms. J Pers45(1):1–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lerner M, Simmons CH (1966) Observer’s reaction to the ‘Innocent Victim’: compassion or rejection? J Pers Soc Psychol 4(2):203–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lorenz K (1966) On aggression. Methuen, LondonGoogle Scholar
  48. Maltby J, Macaskill A, Day L (2001) Failure to forgive self and others: a replication and extension of the relationship between forgiveness, personality, social desirability, and general health. Pers Individ Dif 30:881–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mauger PA, Perry JE, Freeman T, Grove DC, McBride AG, McKinney KE (1992) The measurement of forgiveness: preliminary research. J Psychol Christ 11:170–180Google Scholar
  50. McCullough ME (2008) Beyond revenge: the evolution of the forgiveness instinct. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  51. McCullough ME, Kurzban R, Tabak BA (2013) A cognitive system for revenge and forgiveness. Behav Brain Sci 36:1–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Miceli M, Castelfranchi C (2011) Forgiveness: a cognitive-motivational anatomy. J Theory Soc Behav 41(3):260–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Miller DT (2001) Disrespect and the experience of injustice. Annu Rev Psychol 52:527–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nisbett RE (1993) Violence and U. S. regional culture. Am Psychol 48:441–449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Nisbett RE, Cohen D (1996) Culture of honor. Westview Press, Boulder, COGoogle Scholar
  56. Posner R (1980) Retribution and related concepts of punishment. Journal of Legal Studies 9:71–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Salman A (2002) Forgiveness: origins dynamics, psychopathology and technical relevance. Psychoanal Q 71:175–212Google Scholar
  58. Shackelford TK (2005) An evolutionary psychological analysis of cultures of honor. Evol Psychol 3:381–391Google Scholar
  59. Shackelford TK, Goetz AT, Buss DM, Euler HA, Hoier S (2005) When we hurt the ones we love: predicting violence against women from men’s mate retention tactics. Pers Relat 12:447–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Stillwell AM, Baumeister RF, Priore D (2008) We’re all victims here: toward a psychology of revenge. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 30(3):253–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Subkoviak MJ, Enright RD, Wu C, Gassin EA, Freedman S, Olson LM, Sarinopoulos I (1995) Measuring interpersonal forgiveness in late adolescence and middle adulthood. J Adolesc 18:641–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Tripp TM, Bies RJ (1997) What’s good about revenge? The avengers’ perspective. In: Lewicki RJ, Bies RJ, Sheppard BH (eds) Research on negotiation in organizations, vol 6. JAI, Greenwich, CT, pp 145–160Google Scholar
  63. Vidmar N (2001) Retribution and revenge. In: Sanders J, Hamilton VL (eds) Handbook of justice research in law. Kluwer, New York, pp 31–63Google Scholar
  64. Walster E, Walster G, Berscheid E (1978) Equity: theory and research. Allyn and Bacon, BostonGoogle Scholar
  65. Zaibert L (2006) Punishment and revenge. Law Philos 25:81–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of Agent-based Social Simulation (LABSS), Institute of Cognitive Science and TechnologiesNational Research Council of ItalyRomeItaly

Personalised recommendations