Advertisement

Path Planning Method of Underwater Glider Based on Energy Consumption Model in Current Environment

  • Yaojian Zhou
  • Jiancheng Yu
  • Xiaohui Wang
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8917)

Abstract

It is generally considered that the speed of underwater glider is the function of buoyancy and gliding angle. However, the buoyancy and gliding angle are adjustable, which makes the speed of underwater glider within an adjustable range, however, it is usually taken as a constant in current documentations. Considering the path planning in ocean currents, if the maximum speed of a glider can find a path that connects the start point and the target point, then it can decrease its consumption by adjusting its speed in current field of some regions to fit the favorable currents and overcome the influence of adverse currents. Based on the above facts, the paper presents a new path planning method of adjustable speed glider in currents, and the simulation result is shown. According to the result: compared with the path planning method in constant speed, the adjustable speed glider can utilize the current in a better way and save the consumption of energy in a further way.

Keywords

optimal energy consumption adjustable speed iteration underwater glider path planning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Blidberg, D.R.: The Development of Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV): A brief summary. In: IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Eriksen, C.C., et al.: Seaglider: a long-range autonomous underwater vehicle for oceanographic research. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 26, 424–436 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sherman, J., Davis, R.E., Owens, W.B., Valdes, J.: The autonomous underwater glider ‘Spray’. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering 26, 437–446 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carroll, K.P., Mc Claran, S.R., Nelson, E.L., Barnett, D.M., Friesen, D.K., William, G.N.: AUV path planning: an A* approach to path planning with consideration of variable vehicle speeds and multiple, overlapping, time-dependent exclusion zones. In: Proceedings of the 1992 Symposium on Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Technology, pp. 79–84 (1992)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Tan, C.S., Sutton, R.: J, Chudley. Anincremental stochastic motion planning technique for autonomous underwater vehicles. In: Proceedings of IFAC Control Applications in Marine Systems Conference, pp. 483–488 (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Petres, C., Pailhas, Y., Petillot, Y., Lane, D.: Underwater path planning using fast marching algorithms. In: Oceans 2005-Europe, vol. 2, pp. 814–819 (2005)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garau, B., ´ Alvarez, A., Oliver, G.: Path Planning of Autonomous UnderwaterVehicles in Current Fields with Complex Spatial Variability: an A* Approach. In: Proc. 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 194–198 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rao, D., Williams, S.B.: Large-scale path planning forUnderwater Gliders in ocean currents. In: Australasian Conference on Robotics and Automation (ACRA), Sydney, December 2-4 (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fernandez-Perdomo, E., Cabrera-Gamez, J., Hernandez-Sosa, D., Isern-Gonzalez, J., Dominguez-Brito, A.C., Redondo, A., et al.: Path planning for gliders using Regional OceanModels: Application of Pinzón path planner with the ESEOAT model and the RU27 trans-Atlantic flight data. In: OCEANS 2010 IEEE - Sydney, pp. 1–10 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Soulignac, M., Taillibert, P., Rueher, M.: Adapting the wavefront expansion in presence of strong currents. In: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp. 1352–1358 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Soulignac, M.: Feasible and Optimal Path Planning in Strong Current Fields. IEEE Trans. Robot. 27(1), 89–98 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Soulignac, M., Taillibert, P., Rueher, M.: Time-minimal Path Planning in Dynamic Current Fields. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Isern-Gonzalez, J., Hernandez-Sosa, D., Fernandez-Perdomo, E., Cabrera-Gamez, J., Dominguez-Brito, A.C., Prieto-Maranon, V.: Path planning for underwater gliders using iterative optimization. In: 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), May 9-13, pp. 1538–1543 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Leonard, N.E., Graver, J.G.: Model-based feedback control of autonomous underwater gliders. IEEE J. Ocean. Eng. 26(4), 633–645 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Graver, J.G.: Underwater glider s: Dynamics, control, and design.Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Mech. Aerosp. Eng. Princeton Univ., Princeton, NJ (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mahmoudian, N., Woolsey, C.: Underwater glider motion control. In: Proc. 47th IEEE Conf. Decision Control, Cancun, Mexico, December 9-11, pp. 552–557 (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yu, J., Zhang, F., Zhang, A., Jin, W., Tian, Y.: Motion parameter optimization and sensor scheduling for the sea-wing underwater glider. IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, 243–254 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zhu, X., Yu, J., Wang, X.: Sampling path planning of underwater glider for energy consumption. Robot 33(3), 360–365 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yaojian Zhou
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jiancheng Yu
    • 1
  • Xiaohui Wang
    • 1
  1. 1.Shenyang Institute of AutomationCASShenyangChina
  2. 2.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations