Variable Inspection Plans for Continuous Populations with Unknown Short Tail Distributions

  • Wolfgang KösslerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 122)


The ordinary variable inspection plans are sensitive to deviations from the normality assumption. A new variable inspection plan is constructed that can be used for arbitrary continuous populations with short tail distributions. The peaks over threshold method is used, the tails are approximated by a generalized Pareto distribution, their parameters and the fraction defective are estimated by a moment method proposed in a similar form by Smith and Weissman in J. R. Stat. Soc. B 47:285–298, 1985. The estimates of the fraction defective are asymptotically normal. It turns out that their asymptotic variances do not differ very much for the various distributions. Therefore we may fix the variance and use the known asymptotic distribution for the construction of the inspection plans. The sample sizes needed to satisfy the two-point conditions are much less than that for attribute plans.


  1. 1.
    Beirlant J, Goegebeur Y, Segers J, Teugels J (2004) Statistics of extremes, theory and applications. Wiley, Chichester CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruhn-Suhr M, Krumbholz W (1990) A new variable sampling plan for normally distributed lots with unknown standard deviation and double specification limits. Stat Hefte 31:195–207 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Falk M (1989) Best attainable rate of joint convergence of extremes. In: Hüsler J, Reiss R-D (eds) Extreme value theory. Proceedings of a conference held in Oberwolfach, 6–12 Dec., 1987. Springer, Berlin, pp 1–9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kössler W (1999) A new one-sided variable inspection plan for continuous distribution functions. Allg Stat Arch 83:416–433 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kössler W, Lenz H-J (1995) On the robustness of Lieberman-Resnikoff sampling plans by variables. J. Indian Assoc Product, Qual Reliability 20:93–105 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kössler W, Lenz H-J (1997) On the non-robustness of maximum-likelihood sampling plans by variables. In: Lenz H-J, Wilrich P-Th (eds) Frontiers in statistical quality control, vol 5. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 38–52. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Krumbholz W, Steuer D (2014) On exact and optimal single sampling plans by variables. AStA Adv Stat Anal 98:87–101 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Pickands J (1975) Statistical inference using extreme order statistics. Ann Stat 3:119–135 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Resnikoff GV (1952) A new two-sided acceptance region for sampling by variables. Technical report 8, Applied Mathematics, and Statistics Laboratory, Stanford University Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Smith RL (1987) Estimating tails of probability distributions. Ann Stat 15:1174–1207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith RL, Weissman I (1985) Maximum likelihood estimation of the lower tail of a probability distribution. J R Stat Soc B 47:285–298 MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Steland A, Zähle H (2009) Sampling inspection by variables: nonparametric setting. Stat Neerl 63:101–123 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Uhlmann W (1982) Statistische Qualitätskontrolle. Teubner, Stuttgart CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Computer ScienceHumboldt-UniversitätBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations