Advertisement

Algorithmic Complexity of the Truck Factor Calculation

  • Christoph Hannebauer
  • Volker Gruhn
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8892)

Abstract

Software development projects differ in their sensitivity to losing developers. Some projects must stop already if they lose a few developers, while other projects can continue if the same number of developers leave the project. The TF quantifies these differences: It is the number of developers that would stop the project if they left the project. Multiple specific variants of the TF have been suggested in literature. This paper proves that some of these implementations are actually NP-hard to compute, including the promising worst-case metric TF min ,c . NP-hardness prevents their use for large software development projects. For the TF variants not proved to be NP-hard, this paper provides efficient algorithms. However, this paper argues that these TF variants have less explanatory power.

Keywords

Truck Factor Algorithmic Complexity Project Survivability 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Beck, K., Andres, C.: Extreme Programming Explained: Embrace Change, 2nd edn. Addison-Wesley Professional (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bowler, M.: Truck factor (May 2005), http://www.agileadvice.com/2005/05/15/agilemanagement/truck-factor/ (accessed September 25, 2014)
  3. 3.
    Goetgheluck, P.: Computing binomial coefficients. The American Mathematical Monthly 94(4), 360–365 (1987), http://www.jstor.org/stable/2323099 CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Karp, R.M.: Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller, R.E., Thatcher, J.W., Bohlinger, J.D. (eds.) Complexity of Computer Computations. The IBM Research Symposia Series, pp. 85–103. Springer US (1972), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-2001-2_9
  5. 5.
    Ricca, F., Marchetto, A., Torchiano, M.: On the difficulty of computing the truck factor. In: Caivano, D., Oivo, M., Baldassarre, M.T., Visaggio, G. (eds.) PROFES 2011. LNCS, vol. 6759, pp. 337–351. Springer, Heidelberg (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21843-9_26 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zazworka, N., Stapel, K., Knauss, E., Shull, F., Basili, V.R., Schneider, K.: Are Developers Complying with the Process: An XP Study. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2010, pp. 14:1–14:10. ACM, New York (2010), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1852786.1852805

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Hannebauer
    • 1
  • Volker Gruhn
    • 1
  1. 1.paluno - The Ruhr Institute for Software TechnologyUniversity of Duisburg-EssenGermany

Personalised recommendations