Advertisement

Death Contested: Morphonecrosis and Conflicts of Interpretation

  • Ismael Al-Amoudi
  • John Latsis
Chapter
Part of the Social Morphogenesis book series (SOCMOR)

Abstract

This chapter lays the groundwork for a realist analysis of the disappearance or ‘death’ of social forms, which is particularly relevant in societies experiencing intensified social transformation. Whilst the notion of morphogenesis can account both for the acceleration of change and for the multiplication of coexisting social forms, it does not allow us, on its own, to theorise their disappearance. Addressing this gap in the theory of morphogenesis opens interesting avenues for the philosophical study of society.

Our contribution is organised around three related questions. Firstly, how should we conceptualise the disappearance of social forms and can this conceptualisation draw from the biological conception of death? Secondly, how do concept-dependence and reflexivity differentiate social death from biological death? Thirdly, how can we observe and interpret the agonies that accompany the death of social forms?

We conclude by providing an illustration of how the theory might be applied to a case with significant current socio-economic ramifications: the disappearance of life-long employment in developed capitalist economies.

Keywords

Agonism Decline of life-long employment Disappearance of social forms Morphonecrosis Social and biological death 

References

  1. Al-Amoudi, I. (2014). Morphogenesis and normativity. Problems the former creates for the latter. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Late modernity (pp. 193–219). Cham/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Amoudi, I., & Latsis, J. S. (2014). The arbitrariness and normativity of social conventions. British Journal of Sociology. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12042.Google Scholar
  3. Al-Amoudi, I., & Willmott, H. C. (2011). Where constructionism and critical realism converge: Interrogating the domain of epistemological relativism. Organization Studies, 32(1), 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Archer, M. S. (2012). The reflexive imperative in late modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Archer, M. S. (2013). Morphogenic society: self-government and self-organization as misleading metaphors. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis. Dordrecht/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Necrocapitalism. Organization Studies, 29(12), 1541–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bassanini, A., Breda, T., Caroli, E., & Reberioux, A. (2013). Working in family firms: Paid less but more secure? Evidence from French matched employer-employee data. ILR Review, 66(2), 433–466.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Raisons pratiques: Sur la theorie de l’action. Paris: Editions du Seuil.Google Scholar
  10. Cederstrom, C., & Fleming, P. (2012). Dead man working. Alresford: Zero Books.Google Scholar
  11. Donati, P. (2013). Morphogenesis and relational networks: Relational steering not mechanical feedback. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Social morphogenesis. Dordrecht/London: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Elias, N. (1983/1969). The court society. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  13. Fleming, P. (2009). Authenticity and the cultural politics of work: New forms of informal control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Froud, J., Haslam, C., Johal, S., & Williams, K. (2000). Shareholder value and financialization: Consultancy promises, management moves. Economy & Society, 29(1), 80–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gabriel, Y. (2012). Organizations in a state of darkness: Towards a theory of organizational miasma. Organization Studies, 33(9), 1137–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gringart, E., Helmes, E., & Speelman, C. (2005). Exploring attitudes toward older workers among Australian employers: An empirical study. Journal of Aging and Social Policy, 17, 85–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. James, H. S. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kalleberg, A. L. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the US, 1970s to 2000s. New York: American Sociological Association/Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  19. Mandelbaum, M. (1955). Societal facts. The British Journal of Sociology, 6(4), 305–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McCartin, J. A. (2011). Collision course. Ronald Reagan, the air traffic controllers, and the strike that changed America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  21. McQuaid, R. W., & Lindsay, C. (2005). The concept of employability. Urban Studies, 42(2), 197–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meek, C. B. (2004). The dark side of Japanese management in the 1990s. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(3), 312–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Peck, J., & Theodore, N. (2000). Beyond ‘employability’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 24(6), 729–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Saint-Simon. (1856). Mémoires. Available on http://rouvroy.medusis.com/infos/tomes.html. Accessed 10 Mar 2011.
  25. Sayer, A. (1981). Abstraction: A realist interpretation. Radical Philosophy, 28(2), 6–15.Google Scholar
  26. Willmott, H. (1993). Strength is ignorance; slavery is freedom: managing culture in modern organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 30(4), 515–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Willmott, H. (2001). Death. So what? Sociology, sequestration and emancipation. The Sociological Review, 48(4), 649–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ismael Al-Amoudi
    • 1
  • John Latsis
    • 2
  1. 1.Cardiff Business SchoolUniversity of CardiffCardiffUK
  2. 2.Henley Business SchoolUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations