Advertisement

International Conference on Social Informatics

SocInfo 2014: Social Informatics pp 428-443 | Cite as

Digital Rights and Freedoms: A Framework for Surveying Users and Analyzing Policies

  • Todd Davies
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8851)

Abstract

Interest has been revived in the creation of a “bill of rights” for Internet users. This paper analyzes users’ rights into ten broad principles, as a basis for assessing what users regard as important and for comparing different multi-issue Internet policy proposals. Stability of the principles is demonstrated in an experimental survey, which also shows that freedoms of users to participate in the design and coding of platforms appear to be viewed as inessential relative to other rights. An analysis of users’ rights frameworks that have emerged over the past twenty years also shows that such proposals tend to leave out freedoms related to software platforms, as opposed to user data or public networks. Evaluating policy frameworks in a comparative analysis based on prior principles may help people to see what is missing and what is important as the future of the Internet continues to be debated.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Amazon Mechanical Turk, http://www.mturk.com
  2. 2.
    Cerf, V.: The Right to Connect and Internet Censorship. New Perspectives Quarterly 29(2), 18–23 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Clark, J.: Internet Users Bill of Rights: DOA. The Data Center Journal (March 13, 2014), http://www.datacenterjournal.com/it/internet-users-bill-rights-doa/
  4. 4.
    Connolly, F.W.: Who Are Electronic Learners? Why Should We Worry About Them? Change 26(2), 39–41 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Connolly, F., Gilbert, S.W., Lyman, P.: A Bill of Rights for Electronic Citizens. OTA, Washington, DC (1990)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Creative Commons, http://creativecommons.org
  7. 7.
    Curtis, R.: A Software User’s Bill of Rights - Draft 1, http://www.princeton.edu/~rcurtis/softrights.html
  8. 8.
    Data Portability Project, http://dataportability.org
  9. 9.
    Davies, T., Gangadharan, S.P. (eds.): Online Deliberation: Design, Research, and Practice. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Do Not Track, http://donottrack.us
  11. 11.
    Economides, N.: “Net Neutrality,” Non-Discrimination, and Digital Distribution of Content Through the Internet. I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy 4, 209–233 (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    GNU Affero General Public License. Version 3 (November 19, 2007), http://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html
  13. 13.
    Karat, C.M.: The Computer User’s Bill of Rights (1988), http://theomandel.com/resources/users-bill-of-rights
  14. 14.
    Karat, C.M., Brodie, C., Karat, J.: Usable Privacy and Security for Personal Information Management. Comm. ACM 49(1), 56–57 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kelion, L.: Future of the Internet Debated at NETmundial in Brazil. BBC News (April 22, 2014), http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-27108869
  16. 16.
    Kensing, F., Blomberg, J.: Participatory Design: Issues and Concerns. CSCW 7, 165–185 (1998)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kiss, J.: An Online Magna Carta: Berners-Lee Calls for Bill of Rights for Web. The Guardian (March 11, 2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lessig, L.: Free Culture: The Nature and Future of Creativity. Penguin, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    English Translation of the New Version of Brazil’s Marco Civil, http://infojustice.org/archives/31272
  20. 20.
    Mari, A.: Brazil Passes Groundbreaking Internet Governance Bill. ZDNet (March 26, 2014), http://www.zdnet.com/brazil-passes-groundbreaking-internet-governance-bill-7000027740
  21. 21.
    NETmundial Draft Outcome Document (April 14, 2014), http://document.netmundial.br/
  22. 22.
  23. 23.
    O’Reilly, D.: Time to Update the Software User’s Bill of Rights (December 29, 2009), http://www.cnet.com/news/time-to-update-the-software-users-bill-of-rights
  24. 24.
    Qualtrics: Online Survey Software and Insight Platform, http://www.qualtrics.com
  25. 25.
    Parens, B.: The Open Source Definition. In: Di Bona, C., Ockman, S., Stone, M. (eds.) Open Sources: Voices From the Open Source Revolution, O’Reilly, Sebastopol (1999)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Patrianakos, B.: The Internet User’s Bill of Rights (2014), http://userbillofrights.org/
  27. 27.
    Rosen, J.: The Right to Be Forgotten. Stanford Law Rev. Online. 64, 88 (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Mrs, H.E.: Dilma Rousseff, President (September 24, 2013), http://gadebate.un.org/68/brazil/
  29. 29.
    Schuler, D., Namioka, A.: Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates (1993)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Smarr, J., Canter, M., Scoble, R., Arrington, M.: A Bill of Rights for Users of the Social Web (2007), http://the.networkingur.us/post/2007/09/05/A-Bill-of-Rights-for-Users-of-the-Social-Web
  31. 31.
    Stallman, R.: Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman. Free Software Foundation, Cambridge, MA (2002)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Viégas, F.B., Wattenberg, M., McKeon, M.M.: The Hidden Order of Wikipedia. In: Schuler, D. (ed.) HCII 2007 and OCSC 2007. LNCS, vol. 4564, pp. 445–454. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
  34. 34.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Todd Davies
    • 1
  1. 1.Symbolic Systems Program and Center for the Study of Language and InformationStanford UniversityStanfordUSA

Personalised recommendations