Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 337))

Abstract

It has been established that mammogram plays vital role in early detection of breast diseases. We also know that computational empowerment of mammogram facilitates relevant and significant information. Several research groups are exploring various aspects of mammograms in terms of feature selection to develop an effective automatic classification system.

Mammographic attributes including textural features, statistical features as well as structural features are used effectively to develop automatic classification systems. Several clinical trials explained that attributes of patient’s clinical profile also plays an important role in determination of class of a breast tumor. However, usage of patients clinical attributes for automatic classification and results thereof are not reported in literature. None of the existing standard mammogram datasets provide such additional information about patients history attributes.

Our focus is to validate observations revealed by clinical trials using automatic classification techniques. We have developed a dataset of mammogram images along with significant attributes of patients clinical profile. In this paper, we discuss our experiments with standard mammogram datasets as well as with our extended, informative live data set. Appropriate features are extracted from mammograms to develop Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifier. The results obtained using mere mammographic features are compared with the results obtained using extended feature set which includes clinical attributes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Raghavan, G.: Mammogram Analysis: Tumor Classification. EE 381K - Multidimensional Digital Signal Processing. Springer (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mohan Kumar, S., et al.: Statistical Features Based Classification of Microcalcification in Digital Mammogram Using Stochastic Neighbors Embedding. International Journal of Advanced Information Science and Technology (IJAIST) 7(7) (November 2012) ISSN: 2319:2682

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chang, R.F., et al.: Support Vector Machines for Diagnosis of Breast Tumors on US Images1. Academic Radiology 10(2) (February 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Telagarapu, P., et al.: Extraction to Classify the Benign and Malignant Tumors from Breast Ultrasound Images. International Journal of Engineering and Technology (IJET) 6(1) (February-March 2014) ISSN : 0975-4024

    Google Scholar 

  5. Shi, X., Cheng, H.D., et al.: Mass Detection and Classificatio. In: Breast Ultrasound Images Using Fuzzy SVM, Utah State University 401B. Old Mail Hill, Logan UT 84322, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karmilasari, Widodo, S., Lussiana, E.T.P., Hermita, M., Mawadah,L.: Classification of Mammogram Images using Support Vector Machine, saki.siit.tu.ac.th/acis2013/uploads_final/25.../ACIS%202013-0025.pdf

  7. Zaiane, O.R., Antonie, M.L., Coma, A.: Mammography Classification By an Association Rule based Classifier. In: MDM/KDD 2002: International Workshop on multimedia Data Mining (with ACM SIGKDD) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hejazi, M.R., Ho, Y.-S.: Automated Detection of Tumors in Mammograms Using Two Segments for Classification. In: Ho, Y.-S., Kim, H.-J. (eds.) PCM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3767, pp. 910–921. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Tzikopoulos, S.D., Mavroforakis, M.E., Georgiou, H.V., Dimitropoulos, N., Theodoridis, S.: A fully automated scheme for mammographic segmentation and classification based on breast density and asymmetry. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 102(1), 47–63 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, S., Liu, H., Song, E.: Marker-controlled watershed for lesion segmentation in mammograms. Journal of Digital Imaging 24, 754–763 (2011), http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10278-011-9365-2 , doi:10.1007/s10278-011-9365-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Friedenreich, C.M., et al.: Risk factors for benign proliferative breast disease. International Journal of Epidemiology 29, 637–644 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang, W.T., Tse, G.M.K.: Sonographic, Mammographic, and Histopathologic Correlation of Symptomatic Ductal Carcinoma In Situ. AJR 182 (January 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Thongkam, J., et al.: Toward breast cancer survivability prediction models through improving training space. Elsevier Ltd. (2009), doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2009.04.067

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rosenberg, R.D.: Performance Benchmarks for Screening Mammography1. Radiology 241(1) (October 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Tintus-Ernstoff, L., et al.: Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United Sates). Springer Science + Business media B.V. (2006), doi:10.1007/s10552-006-0071-1

    Google Scholar 

  16. Artmann, L.C.H., et al.: Efficacy of Bilateral Prophylactic Mastectomy in Women With A Family History of Breast Cancer. The New England Journal of Medicine 340 (January 14, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Robsahm, T.E., et al.: Breast cancer incidence in food- vs. non-food-producing areas in Norway: possible beneficial effects of World War II. British Journal of Cancer 86, 362–366 (2002), doi:10.1038/sj/bjc/6600084

    Google Scholar 

  18. Must, A., et al.: Recall of Early Menstrual History and Menarcheal Body Size: After 30 Years,How Well Do Women Remember? American Journal of Epidemiology 155(7)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Roberts, M., et al.: Risk of breast cancer in women with history of benign disease of the breast. British Medical Journal 288 (January 28, 1984)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bhale, A., Joshi, M., et al.: Development of a Standard Multimodal Mammographic Dataset. In: Proceedings of National Conference on Advances in Computing (NCAC 2013), March 5-6, North Maharashtra University, Jalgaon (2013) ISBN: 978-81-910591-7-5

    Google Scholar 

  21. Mohanty, A.K., et al.: An improved data mining technique for classification and detection of breast cancer from mammograms. Springer- Verlag London Limited (2012), doi:10.1007/s00521-012-834-4

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nick Bryan, R.: Introduction to the Science of Medical Imaging. Cambridge University Press, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511994685 ISBN: 9780511994685

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aparna Bhale .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bhale, A., Joshi, M., Patil, Y. (2015). Role of Clinical Attributes in Automatic Classification of Mammograms. In: Satapathy, S., Govardhan, A., Raju, K., Mandal, J. (eds) Emerging ICT for Bridging the Future - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Convention of the Computer Society of India (CSI) Volume 1. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 337. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13728-5_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13728-5_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13727-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13728-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics