Advertisement

Onto Design Graphics (ODG): A Graphical Notation to Standardize Ontology Design

  • Rafaela Blanca Silva-López
  • Mónica Silva-López
  • Iris Iddaly Méndez-Gurrola
  • Maricela Bravo
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8856)

Abstract

Ontology design is a complex task that requires the use of some graphical tools to assist the ontology developer. Although there have been great advances in ontology engineering research, a standard graphical notation has not been adopted yet. In this paper we propose a graphical notation for ontology design aiming at facilitating to share and reuse ontology designs between ontology users. Some authors propose the mapping of ontology elements with Unified Modeling Language (UML) components. However, a direct association between UML elements and ontology design issues does not exist. OntoDesign Graphics is an easy to learn graphical notation that it is used for displaying visually the elements of the ontology design, facilitating the design and integration of other designs clearly and efficiently.

Keywords

ontology design ontology graphical notation knowledge reuse 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gruber, T.R.: A Translation Approach to Portable Ontology Specification. Knowledge Acquisition 5, 199–220 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kogut, P., Cranefield, S., Hart, L., Dutra, M., Backawski, K., Kokar, M., Smith, J.: UML for ontology development. The Knowledge Engineering Review 17(1), 61–64 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cranefield, S., Purvis, M.: UML as an Ontology Modelling Language. In: The Proceedings of the IJCAI 1999 Workshop on Intelligent Information Integration, Germany (1999)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, X., Chan, C.W.: Ontology Modeling Using UML. In: 7th International Conference on Object Oriented Information Systems (OOIS), Calgary, Canada, pp. 59–68 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baclawski, K., Kokar, M., Kogut, P., Hart, L., Smith, J., Letkowski, J., Emery, P.: Extending the Unified Modeling Language for ontology development. Software and Systems Modeling 1(2), 142–156 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Palmer, C., Chungoora, N., Young, R., Gunendran, A., Usman, Z., Case, K., Harding, J.: Exploiting unified modelling language (UML) as a preliminary design tool for Common Logic-based ontologies in manufacturing. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing 26(3), 267–283 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ontology Definition Metamodel, http://www.omg.org/spec/ODM/1.1/
  8. 8.
    Kendall, E., Bell, R., Burkhart, R., Dutra, M., Wallace, E.: Towards a Graphical Notation for OWL 2. OWLED. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 529. CEUR-WS.org (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ceccaroni, L., Kendall, E.: A graphical environment for ontology development. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 958–959. ACM (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ceccaroni, L., Kendall, E.: A Semantically-Rich, Graphical Environment for Collaborative Ontology Development in Agentcities. iD3, Barcelona, Spain (2003)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Benevides, A.B., Guizzardi, G.: A Model-Based Tool for Conceptual Modeling and Domain Ontology Engineering in OntoUML. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) Enterprise Information Systems. LNBIP, vol. 24, pp. 528–538. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gomes Mian, P., de Almeida Falbo, R.: Supporting ontology development with ODEd. Journal of the Brazilian Computer Society 9(2), 57–76 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Katifori, A., Halatsis, C., Lepouras, G., Vassilakis, C., Giannopoulou, E.: Ontology visualization methods—a survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 39(4), Article 10 (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kriglstein, S., Wallner, G.: Knoocks - A Visualization Approach for OWL Lite Ontologies. In: 2010 International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, pp. 950–955 (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kriglstein, S.: OWL Ontology Visualization: Graphical Representations of Properties on the Instance Level. In: 2010 14th International Conference on Information Visualisation (IV), pp. 92–97 (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lohmann, S., Negru, S., Haag, F., Ertl, T.: VOWL 2: User-Oriented Visualization of Ontologies. In: Lambrix, P., Hyvönen, E., Janowicz, K., Schlobach, S. (eds.) EKAW 2014. LNCS, vol. 8876. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lohmann, S., Negru, S., Bold, D.: The ProtégéVOWL plugin: Ontology visualization for everyone. To appear in Proceedings of ESWC 2014 Satellite Events. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Negru, S., Haag, F., Lohmann, S.: Towards a unified visual notation for OWL ontologies: insights from a comparative user study. In: Sabou, M., Blomqvist, E., Di Noia, T., Sack, H., Pellegrini, T. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-SEMANTICS 2013), pp. 73–80. ACM, New York (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rafaela Blanca Silva-López
    • 1
  • Mónica Silva-López
    • 1
  • Iris Iddaly Méndez-Gurrola
    • 1
  • Maricela Bravo
    • 1
  1. 1.Systems Department, Metropolitan Autonomous University (UAM)Distrito FederalMéxico

Personalised recommendations