Advertisement

Commanded Aspirations and Half-Hearted Enactment: The (Yet) Unfulfilled Promises of French-Style CSR

  • François Maon
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

Although France came rather late to the corporate social responsibility (CSR) gathering, strong political will to address the CSR notion emerged around the turn of the twenty-first century, materializing in a substantial and pioneering body of legislation. However, the political aspirations and associated legislative efforts have not always led to the expected changes in how French companies address CSR-related issues in practice. The seeds of CSR progress and evolution may have been planted by key political and business actors in the past two decades, but French-style CSR remains, to a certain extent, an unfulfilled promise. This chapter briefly evokes the central characteristics of CSR in France’s business and political environments. Following an account of the historical evolution of France’s CSR-related regulatory efforts and government-led initiatives, with a strong focus on the twenty-first century, this chapter details the central challenges for the continued development and progress of CSR in the French business landscape.

Keywords

Corporate Social Responsibility Socially Responsible Investment Corporate Social Responsibility Practice Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting French Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Albareda, L., Lozano, J., & Ysa, T. (2007). Public policies on corporate social responsibility: The role of governments in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 391–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baratin, F., Helias, A., Le Quentrec, M., Moreau, R., & Vilchien, D. (2007). Mise en œuvre par les entreprises françaises cotées de l’obligation de publier des informations sociales et environnementales. Paris: Inspection générale de l’environnement, Conseil général des mines and Inspection générale des affaires sociales.Google Scholar
  3. Beaujolin, F., & Capron, M. (2005). France – Balancing between constructive harassment and virtuous intentions. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 97–108). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berthoin Antal, A., & Sobczak, A. (2004). Beyond CSR: Organizational learning for global responsibility. Journal of General Management, 30(2), 77–98.Google Scholar
  5. Berthoin Antal, A., & Sobczak, A. (2007). Corporate social responsibility in France: A mix of national traditions and international influences. Business and Society, 46(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blasco, M., & Zolner, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Mexico and France: Exploring the role of normative institutions. Business and Society, 49(2), 216–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bocquet, R., & Mothe, C. (2011). Exploring the relationship between CSR and innovation: A comparison between small and large sized French companies. Revue Sciences de Gestion, 80, 101–119.Google Scholar
  8. Brovelli, L., Drago, X., Molinié, E., Fribourg, M., Lenoir, C., Le Divenah, J.-P., et al. (2013). Responsabilité et performance des organisations. Paris: Ministère de l’Economie et des Finances; Ministère du Commerce Extérieur; Ministère de l’Ecologie, du Développement Durable et de l’Energie; Ministère du Travail, de l’Emploi, de la Formation Professionnelle et du Dialogue Social.Google Scholar
  9. Cone Communications. (2013). Global CSR study. Boston, MA: Cone Communications.Google Scholar
  10. Cotentin, C., & Duval, G. (2009). Editorial: Le chemin est encore long. Alternatives Economiques, Special Issue 41, 5.Google Scholar
  11. CSR Europe. (2010). A guide to CSR in Europe: Country insights by CSR Europe’s national partner organizations. Brussels: CSR Europe.Google Scholar
  12. D’Humières, P. (2013). Où en est la RSE en France, à la veille d'initiatives publiques nouvelles? Blog of the Institut RSE. Available at http://www.reporting-rse.com/EasyBlog/ou-en-est-la-rse-en-france-a-la-veille-dinitiatives-publiques-nouvelles.html, last accessed on March 25, 2014.
  13. Deloitte France. (2013). Reporting RSE selon l’article 225 de la loi ‘Grenelle 2’ – Bilan de la première année d’application. Neuilly-sur-Seine: Deloitte & Associates.Google Scholar
  14. Eberhard Harribey, L. (2009). France. In S. O. Idowu & W. Leal Filho (Eds.), Global practices of corporate social responsibility (pp. 37–60). Berlin: Springer. Chapter 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ernst, E., & Honoré-Rougé, Y. (2012). La responsabilité sociétale des entreprises: Une démarche déjà répandue. INSEE Première, 1421 (November).Google Scholar
  16. Ernst & Young. (2012). How France’s new sustainability reporting law impacts US companies. London: Ernst & Young.Google Scholar
  17. FCRSE. (2011). Le FCRSE exige du gouvernement qu’il respecte ses engagements en matière de transparence des entreprises. Paris: Forum Citoyen pour la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises. Press Release (March 4).Google Scholar
  18. FCRSE. (2012). Parution du décret d’application de l’article 225: le tour de passe-passe. Paris: Forum Citoyen pour la Responsabilité Sociale des Entreprises. Press Release (May 2).Google Scholar
  19. Fiss, P., & Zajac, E. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49(4), 501–534.Google Scholar
  20. Groupe Alpha. (2004). Les informations sociales dans les rapports annuels: Deuxième année d’application de la loi NRE. Marseille: Groupe Alpha.Google Scholar
  21. Groupe Alpha. (2005). Les informations sociales dans les rapports annuels: Troisième année d’application de la loi NRE. Marseille: Groupe Alpha.Google Scholar
  22. Groupe Alpha. (2012). Bilan de neuf années d’application de la loi NRE en matière de reporting social. Marseille: Groupe Alpha.Google Scholar
  23. Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2006). International differences in the cost of equity capital: Do legal institutions and securities regulation matter? Journal of Accounting Research, 44(3), 485–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hartman, L., Rubin, R., & Dhanda, K. (2007). The communication of corporate social responsibility: United States and European Union multinational corporations. Journal of Business Ethics, 74(4), 373–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2011). The consequences of mandatory corporate sustainability reporting. HBS Working Paper Series 11-100.Google Scholar
  26. KPMG. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. Zug: KPMG International Cooperative.Google Scholar
  27. La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2006). What works in securities laws? Journal of Finance, 61(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leblanc, S. (2013). Is there a ‘CSR made in France’? Business for Social Responsibility (BSR) – Our insights. Available at http://www.bsr.org/fr/our-insights/blog-view/is-there-a-csr-made-in-france, last accessed on March 16, 2014.
  29. Lydenberg, S., & Grace, K. (2008). Innovations in social and environmental disclosure outside the United States. New York, NY: Domini Social Investments and Social Investment Forum.Google Scholar
  30. Mangematin, Y. (2013). Management et lois RSE: Vers un droit impératif et une opportunité stratégique. CEREFIGE Working Paper Series 2013-06.Google Scholar
  31. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2005). A conceptual framework for understanding CSR. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 335–356). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Moon, J., Slager, R., Anastasiadis, S., Hardi, P., Bartz, R., & Knudsen, J. S. (2012). Analysis of the national and EU policies supporting corporate social responsibility and impact. IMPACT Working Paper Series 2.Google Scholar
  35. Morris, J., & Baddache, F. (2012). The five W’s of France’s CSR reporting law. San Francisco, CA: Business for Social Responsibility (BSR).Google Scholar
  36. Riess, B., & Welzel, C. (2006). Government as partner? CSR policy in Europe. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  37. Schmidt, V. (2003). French capitalism transformed, yet still a third variety of capitalism. Economy and Society, 32(4), 526–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sobczak, A., & Martins Coelho, L. (2010). The impact and interplay of national and global CSR discourses: Insights from France and Brazil. Corporate Governance, 10(4), 445–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Steurer, R., Martinuzzi, R.-A., & Margula, S. (2012). Public policies on CSR in Europe: Themes, instruments and regional differences. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 19(4), 206–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. SustainAbility, Utopies, & UNEP. (2003). Etat du reporting sur le développement durable. Paris: Utopies.Google Scholar
  41. Vogel, D. (1992). The globalization of business ethics: Why America remains different. California Management Review, 35(1), 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Vogel, D. (2006). The market for virtue: The potential and limits for corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  43. Young, S., & Marais, M. (2012). A multi-level perspective of CSR reporting: The implications of national institutions and industry risk characteristics. Corporate Governance, 20(5), 432–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IESEG School of Management – LEM CNRSUniversité Catholique de LilleLilleFrance

Personalised recommendations