Symbiotic Interaction: A Critical Definition and Comparison to other Human-Computer Paradigms

  • Giulio Jacucci
  • Anna Spagnolli
  • Jonathan Freeman
  • Luciano Gamberini
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8820)

Abstract

We propose a definition of symbiotic interaction that is informed by current developments in computing. We clearly distinguish this definition from previous ones and from selected paradigms that address the human-computer relationship. The definition is also informed by a variety of human-centered frameworks in human-computer interaction, including embodied interactions, situationist frameworks, and participatory and work-oriented design perspectives. Symbiotic interactions can be achieved by combining computation, sensing technology, and interaction design to realize deep perception, awareness, and understanding between humans and computers. Important aspects to implement are transparency, reciprocity, and collaborative use of resources for both computers and humans. The symbiotic relationship is also characterized by goals and agency independence of humans and computers. The definition sets the premise to discuss in a critical way future research agendas for symbiotic interactions that are sensitive to human-centered values.

Keywords

Human-computer symbiosis Human-computer interaction frameworks Research agenda Affective computing Persuasive technologies Embodied interaction 

References

  1. 1.
    Licklider, J.C.R.: Man-computer symbiosis. IRE Trans. Hum. Factors Electron. 1, 4–11 (1960)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Engelbart, D.C.: Augmenting human intellect: a conceptual framework (1962)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roy, D.: \(10^{\rm x}\)—human-machine symbiosis. BT Technol. J. 22(4), 121–124 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    van Erp, J.B., Veltman, H.J., Grootjen, M.: Brain-based indices for user system symbiosis. In: Tan, D.S., Nijholt, A. (eds.) Brain-Computer Interfaces, pp. 201–219. Springer, London (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Schalk, G.: Brain–computer symbiosis. J. Neural Eng. 5(1), P1 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barral, O., et al.: Covert persuasive technologies: bringing subliminal cues to human-computer interaction. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2014. LNCS, vol. 8462, pp. 1–12. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Aranyi, G., Kouider, S., Lindsay, A., Prins, H., Ahmed, I., Jacucci, G., Negri, P., Gamberini, L., Pizzi, D., Cavazza, M.: Subliminal cueing of selection behavior in a virtual environment. PRESENCE: Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 23(1), 33–50 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Picard, R.W.: Affective computing: challenges. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59(1), 55–64 (2003)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fogg, B.J.: Persuasive Technology: Using Computers to Change What We Think and Do. Morgan Kaufmann, Amsterdam (2003)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Reeves, B.: “Being there”: television as symbolic versus natural experience. Stanford University, Institute of communication Research, Stanford Unpublished manuscript (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Witmer, B.G., Singer, M.J.: Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 7, 225–240 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lombard, M., Ditton, T.: At the heart of it all: the concept of presence. J. Computer-Mediated Commun. 3(2) (1997)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Riecke, B.E., Von der Heyde, M.: Qualitative modelling of spatial orientation processes using logical propositions: interconnecting spatial presence, spatial updating, piloting, and spatial cognition. Technical Report No. 100, Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics (2002)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Biocca, F., Harms, C., Burgoon, J.: Toward a more robust theory and measure of social presence: review and suggested criteria. Presence 12(5), 456–480 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spagnolli, A., Bracken, C.C., Orso, V.: The role played by the concept of presence in validating the efficacy of a cybertherapy treatment: a literature review. Virtual Reality 18(1), 13–36 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gamberini L., Spagnolli A.: Presence in mediated environments: accounting for new modes of human action. In: Lombard, M., Biocca, F., Freeman, J., IJsselsteijn, W., Jones, R. (eds.) Immersed in Media I: Telepresence Theory, Measurement and Technology. Springer, London (in press)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mantovani, G., Riva, G.: Building a bridge between different scientific communities. On Sheridan’s eclectic ontology of presence. Presence Teleoperators Virtual Environ. 10, 537–543 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Spagnolli, A., Gamberini, L.: A place for presence. Understanding the human involvement in mediated interactive environments. PsychNology J. 3(1), 6–15 (2005)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gilroy, S.W., Cavazza, M.O., Vervondel, V.: Evaluating multimodal affective fusion using physiological signals. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, February 2011, pp. 53–62. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ball, G., Breese, J.: Emotion and personality in a conversational agent. In: Cassell, J., Sullivan, J., Prevost, S., Churchill, E. (eds.) Embodied Conversational Agents, pp. 189–219. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rosis, F.D., Pelachaud, C., Poggi, I., Carofiglio, V., Carolis, B.D.: From Greta’s mind to her face: modelling the dynamics of affective states in a conversational embodied agent. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59(1), 81–118 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Gamberini, L., Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Jacucci, G., Tusa, G., Mikkola, T., Zamboni, L., Hoggan, E.: Tailoring feedback to users’ actions in a persuasive game for household electricity conservation. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 100–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spagnolli, A., Corradi, N., Gamberini, L., Hoggan, E., Jacucci, G., Katzeff, C., Broms, L., Jönsson, L.: Eco-feedback on the go: motivating energy awareness. Computer 44(5), 38–45 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Japuntich, S., Zehner, M., Smith, S., Jorenby, D., Valdez, J., Fiore, M., Baker, T., Gustafson, D.: Smoking cessation via the internet: a randomized clinical trial of an internet intervention as adjuvant treatment in a smoking cessation intervention. Nicotine Tob. Res. 8 Suppl 1(1), S59–67 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Consolvo, S., Klasnja, P., McDonald, D.W., Landay, J.A.: Goal-setting considerations for persuasive technologies that encourage physical activity. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Persuasive Technology, p. 8. ACM, April 2009Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chittaro, L.: Passengers’ safety in aircraft evacuations: employing serious games to educate and persuade. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 215–226. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Berdichevsky, D., Neuenschwander, E.: Toward an ethics of persuasive technology. Commun. ACM 42(5), 51–58 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smids, J.: The voluntariness of persuasive technology. In: Bang, M., Ragnemalm, E.L. (eds.) PERSUASIVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7284, pp. 123–132. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spahn, A.: And lead us (not) into persuasion..? Persuasive technology and the ethics of communication. Sci. Eng. Ethics 18(4), 633–650 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Brynjarsdottir, H., Håkansson, M., Pierce, J., Baumer, E., DiSalvo, C., Sengers, P.: Sustainably unpersuaded: how persuasion narrows our vision of sustainability. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 947–956. ACM (2012)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jameson, A.: Choices and decisions of computer users. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) The Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies and Emerging Applications, 3rd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Horvitz, E.: Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. In: Proceedings of SIGCHI, pp. 159–166 (1999)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Flemisch, F.O., Adams, C.A., Conway, S.R., Goodrich, K.H., Palmer, M.T., Schutte, P.C.: The H-Metaphor as a guideline for vehicle automation and interaction (2003)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Jameson, A.: Adaptive interfaces and agents. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J.A. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction: Design Issues, Solutions, and Applications, p. 105. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Jordan, P.W.: Designing great stuff that people love. In: Blythe, M., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A., Wright, P. (eds.) Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    McCarthy, J., Wright, P.: Technology as Experience. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Suchman, L.: Plans and Situated Actions. CUP, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Hollan, J., Hutchins, E., Kirsh, D.: Distributed cognition: toward a new foundation for human-computer interaction research. ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact. (TOCHI) 7(2), 174–196 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Kuutti, K.: Activity theory as a potential framework for human-computer interaction research. In: Nardi, B. (ed.) Context and Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer Interaction, pp. 17–44. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Carroll, J.M., Rosson, M.B.: Paradox of the Active User. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1987)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Bødker, S., Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M.: Setting the stage: workshops and group interaction. In: Greenbaum, J., Kyng, M. (eds.) Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, pp. 139–154. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale (1991)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Ehn, P.: Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Arbetslivscentrum, Falköping (1988)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Dourish, P.: Accounting for system behaviour: representation, reflection and resourceful action. In: Kyng, M., Mathiassen, L. (eds.) Computers and Design in Context, pp. 145–170. MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Dourish, P.: Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Dourish, P.: Seeking a Foundation for context-aware computing. Hum. Comput. Interact. 16(2–4), 229–241 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Redström, J.: Designing everyday computational things. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Informatics, Gothenburg University, Gothenburg Studies in Informatics, No. 20 (2001)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hallnäs, L., Redström, J.: Slow technology; designing for reflection. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 5(3), 201–212 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Svanæs, D.: Understanding interactivity, steps to a phenomenology of human-computer interaction. Doctoral Dissertation, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway (1999)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Iacucci, G., Kuutti, K.: Everyday life as a stage in creating and performing scenarios for wireless devices. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. J. 6(4), 299–306 (2002). (Springer-Verlag London Ltd.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Macaulay, C., Jacucci, G., O’Neill, S., Kankaineen, T., Simpson, M.: The emerging roles of performance within HCI and interaction design. Interact. Comput. 18(6), 942–955 (2006). (Elsevier)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Binder, T., De Michelis, G., Ehn, P., Jacucci, G., Linde, P., Wagner, I.: Design Things. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jacucci, G., Spagnolli, A., Chalambalakis, A., Morrison, A., Liikkanen, L., Roveda, S., Bertoncini, M.: Bodily explorations in space: social experience of a multimodal art installation. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5727, pp. 62–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Laurel, B.: Computers as Theatres. Addison-Wesley, New York (1992)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jacucci, C., Jacucci, G., Wagner, I., Psik, T.: A manifesto for the performative development of ubiquitous media. In: Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility, pp. 19–28. ACM (2005)Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jacucci, G., Wagner, I.: Performative uses of space in mixed media environments. In: Turner, P., Davenport, E. (eds.) Spaces, Spatiality and Technology, vol. 5, pp. 191–216. Springer, Netherlands (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Jacucci, G.: Interaction as performance: performative strategies in designing interactive experiences. In: Ekman, U., Bolter, J. D., Diaz, L., Engberg, M., Søndergaard, M. (eds.) Ubiquitous Computing, Complexity, and Culture. Routledge, New York (2015)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Ohm, P.: Broken promises of privacy: responding to the surprising failure of anonymization. UCLA Law Rev. 57(6), 1701–1777 (2010)Google Scholar
  58. 58.
    El Emam, K., Neri, E., Jonker, E.: An evaluation of personal health information remnants in second-hand personal computer disk drives. J. Med. Internet Res. 9(3), e24 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tavani, H.T.: KDD, data mining, and the challenge for normative privacy. Ethics Inf. Technol. 1, 265–273 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Tavani, H.T.: Genomic research and data-mining technology: implications for personal privacy and informed consent. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6(1), 15–28 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    van Wel, L., Royakkers, L.: Ethical issues in web data mining. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6, 129–140 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Bennett, C.J.: Cookies, web bugs, webcams and cue cats: patterns of surveillance on the world wide web. Ethics Inf. Technol. 3, 197–210 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Britz, J.: Technology as a threat to privacy: ethical challenges and guidelines for the information professionals. Microcomput. Inf. Manage. 13(3–4), 175–193 (1996)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Papagounos, G., Spyropoulos, B.: The multifarious function of medical records: ethical issues. Methods Inf. Med. 38(4–5), 317–320 (1999)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    DeCew, J.W.: Privacy and policy for genetic research. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6(1), 5–14 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Kuzu, A.: Problems related to computer ethics: origins of the problems and suggested solutions. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. 8(2), 91–110 (2009)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Myers, M.D.: Ethical dilemmas in the use of information technology: an aristotelian perspective. Ethics Behav. 6(2), 153 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Moor, J.H.: Towards a theory of privacy in the information age. ACM SIGCAS Comput. Soc. 40(2), 31–34 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Naylor, J.: An analytical review of the experimental basis of subception. J. Psychol. 46, 75–96 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Birgegard, A.: Persistent effects of subliminal stimulation: sex differences and the effectiveness of debriefing. Scand. J. Psychol. 49(1), 19–29 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Ruotsalo, T., Peltonen, J., Eugster, Manuel, J.A., Głowacka, D., Konyushkova, K., Athukorala, K., Kosunen, I., Reijonen, A., Myllymäki, P., Jacucci, G., Kaski, S.: Directing exploratory search with interactive intent modeling. In: ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (2013)Google Scholar
  72. 72.
    Glowacka, D., Ruotsalo, T., Konuyshkova, K., Kaski, S., Jacucci, G.: Directing exploratory search: reinforcement learning from user interactions with keywords. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 117–128. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Jylhä, A., Nurmi, P., Sirén, M., Hemminki, S., Jacucci, G.: Matkahupi: a persuasive mobile application for sustainable mobility. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing Adjunct Publication, pp. 227–230. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    Gabrielli, S., Forbes, P., Jylhä, A., Wells, S., Sirén, M., Hemminki, S., Nurmi, P., Maimone, R., Masthof, J., Jacucci, G.: Design challenges in motivating change for sustainable urban mobility. Comput. Hum. Behav. (2014)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Athukorala, K., Lagerspetz, E., von Kügelgen, M., Jylhä, A., Oliner, A.J., Tarkoma, S., Jacucci, G.: How carat affects user behavior: implications for mobile battery awareness applications. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1029–1038. ACM (2014)Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Chau, D.H., Kittur, A., Hong, J.I., Faloutsos, C.: Apolo: making sense of large network data by combining rich user interaction and machine learning. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 167–176. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    Verbert, K., Parra, D., Brusilovsky, P., Duval, E.: Visualizing recommendations to support exploration, transparency and controllability. In: Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI ’13, pp. 351–362. ACM (2013)Google Scholar
  78. 78.
    Ahn, J.-W., Brusilovsky, P.: Adaptive visualization for exploratory information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 49(5), 1139–1164 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Eugster, M.J., Ruotsalo, T., Spapé, M.M., Kosunen, I., Barral, O., Ravaja, N., Jacucci, G., Kaski, S.: Predicting term-relevance from brain signals. In: Proceedings of the 37th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research & Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’14), pp. 425–434. ACM, New York (2014)Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Lessiter, J., Freeman, J., Miotto, A., Ferrari, E.: Ghosts in the machines: towards a taxonomy of human-computer interactions. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 21-34. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  81. 81.
    Barral, O., Jacucci, G.: Applying physiological computing methods to study psychological, affective and motivational relevance. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 35-46. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Negri, P., Gamberini, L., Cutini, S.: A review of researches on subliminal techniques for implicit interaction in symbiotic systems. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 47-60. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Moreno, J.C., et al.: Symbiotic wearable robotic exoskeletons: the concept of the BioMot project. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 72-86. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Åman, P., Liikkanen, L.A., Jacucci, G., Hinkka, A.: OUTMedia: symbiotic service for music discovery in urban augmented reality. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 61-71. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Spagnolli, A., Guardigli, E., Orso, V., Varotto, A., Gamberini, L.: Measuring user acceptance of wearable symbiotic devices: validation study across application scenarios. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 87-98. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Pluchino, P., Gamberini, L., Barral, O., Minelle, F.: How semantic processing of words evokes changes in pupil. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 99-114. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  87. 87.
    Serim, B.: Querying and display of information: symbiosis in exploratory search interaction scenarios. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 115-120. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  88. 88.
    Bandyopadhyay, P., Ruotsalo, T., Ukkonen, A., Jacucci, G.: Navigating complex information spaces: a portfolio theory approach. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 138-144. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  89. 89.
    Hsieh, Y.-T., Jylhä, A., Jacucci, G.: Pointing and selecting with tactile glove in 3D. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 133-137. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Andolina, S., Forlizzi, J.: A multi-touch interface for multi-robot path planning and control. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 127-132. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Hore, S., Tyrväinen, L., Pyykkö, J., Glowacka, D.: A reinforcement learning approach to query-less image retrieval. In: Jacucci, G., Gamberini, L., Freeman, J., Spagnolli, A. (eds.) Symbiotic 2014. LNCS, vol. 8820, pp. 121-126. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giulio Jacucci
    • 1
    • 3
  • Anna Spagnolli
    • 2
  • Jonathan Freeman
    • 4
  • Luciano Gamberini
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Computer Science, Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIITUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of General PsychologyUniversity of PaduaPaduaItaly
  3. 3.Helsinki Institute for Information Technology HIITAalto UniversityEspooFinland
  4. 4.Department of Psychology, I2 Media ResearchGoldsmiths University of LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations