Why Do the Public Oppose Inheritance Taxes?

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice book series (IUSGENT, volume 40)

Abstract

Common wisdom supposes that inheritance taxes are very unpopular among the public. This public opposition seems puzzling as these taxes typically apply to a minority of estates. Usual explanations for this are that people are poorly informed about the extent of these taxes or that there is a lack of a compelling moral case for such taxes. This chapter argues that current approaches do not go far enough. It suggests public attitudes to inheritance taxes are better understood as a specific case of discontent with wider taxes. Addressing this means tackling a disconnection the public feel over the taxes they pay as well as exploring public reactions to different combinations of taxes. Greater public support for inheritance taxes is important for building public compliance with these taxes as well as improving the chances for policy reform.

Keywords

Public Opinion Public Attitude Rational Choice Theory Moral Argument Public Opposition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bartels, Larry. 2006. A tale of two tax cuts, a wage squeeze, and a tax credit. National Tax Journal LIX (3): 403–422.Google Scholar
  2. Beckert, Jens. 2007. The Longue Durée of inheritance law. Discourses and institutional development in France, Germany and the United States since 1800. Archives Européenes de Sociologie XLVIII (1): 79–120.Google Scholar
  3. Beckert, Jens. 2008. Why is the estate tax so controversial? Society 45:521–528.Google Scholar
  4. Birney, Mayling, Michael Graetz, and Ian Shapiro. 2006. Public opinion and the push to repeal the estate tax. National Tax Journal LIX (3): 439–461.Google Scholar
  5. Boadway, Robin, Emma Chamberlain, and Carl Emmerson. 2010. Taxation of wealth and wealth transfers. http://www.ifs.org.uk/mirrleesreview/dimensions/ch8.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2014.
  6. Cole, Richard, and John Kincaid. 2000. Public opinion and American Federalism: Perspectives on taxes, spending and trust—an ACIR update. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 30 (1–2): 189–201.Google Scholar
  7. Commission on Taxation and Citizenship. 2000. Paying for progress: A new politics of tax for public spending. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  8. Cremer, Helmuth. 2010. Commentary. http://www.ifs.org.uk/mirrleesreview/dimensions/ch8.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2014.
  9. Cremer, Helmuth, and Pierre Pestieau. 2010. Wealth and wealth transfer taxation: A survey. International studies program. Working paper 10–17. Atlanta: Georgia State University.Google Scholar
  10. Cunliffe, John, and Guido Errygers, eds. 2012. Inherited wealth, justice and equality. London: Routledge .Google Scholar
  11. Dionne, Eugine Joseph Jr. 2005. The Paris Hilton tax cut. The Washington Post, 12 April.Google Scholar
  12. Edlund, Jonas. 2000. Public attitudes towards taxation: Sweden 1981–1997. Scandinavian Political Studies 23 (1): 37–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Edlund, Jonas. 2003. Attitudes towards taxation: Ignorant and incoherent? Scandinavian Political Studies 26 (2): 145–167.Google Scholar
  14. European Social Survey. 2009. Exploring public attitudes, informing public policy. Selected findings from the first three rounds. http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/docs/findings/ESS1-3_findings_booklet.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2014.
  15. Fatemi, Darius, John Hasseldine, and Peggy Hite. 2008. Resisting framing effects: The importance of prior attitudes on estate tax preferences. Journal of American Taxation Association 30 (1): 101–121.Google Scholar
  16. Gemmell, Norman, Oliver Morrissey, and Abuzer Pinar. 2004. Tax perceptions and preferences over tax structure in the United Kingdom. Economic Journal 117:F117–F138.Google Scholar
  17. Goodin, Robert. 2003. Sneaking up on stakeholding. In The ethics of stakeholding, eds. Keith Dowding, Jurgen De Wispelaere, and Stuart White, 65–78. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.Google Scholar
  18. Graetz, Michael. 2011. The politics and policy of the estate tax- past, present, and future, yale law and economics research paper number 425. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1755161. Accessed 25 April 2014.
  19. Graetz, Michael, and Ian Shapiro. 2005. Death by a thousand cuts. The fight over taxing inherited Wealth. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Hammar, Henrik, Sverker C. Jagers, and Katarina Nordblom. 2008. Attitudes towards tax levels: A multi-tax comparison. Fiscal Studies 29 (4): 523–543.Google Scholar
  21. Hedges, Alan, and Catherine Bromley. 2001. Public attitudes towards taxation: The report of research conducted for the fabian commission on taxation and citizenship. London: The Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  22. Johnson, Paul, and Gareth Myles. 2011. The Mirrlees review. Fiscal Studies 32 (3): 319–329.Google Scholar
  23. Kahneman Daniel, and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica XLVII (1979): 263–291.Google Scholar
  24. Kaplow, Louis. 2000. A framework for assessing estate and gift taxation. National bureau of economic research, Working paper 7775.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplow, Louis. 2011. An optimal tax system. Fiscal Studies 32 (3): 415–435.Google Scholar
  26. Kincaid, John, and Richard Cole. 2001. Changing public attitudes on power and taxation in the American federal system. Publius: the Journal of Federalism 31 (3): 205–214.Google Scholar
  27. Klein, Ezra. 2005. The Paris Hilton benefit act. The American Prospect, 12 April.Google Scholar
  28. Krupnikov, Yanna, Adam. S. Levine, Arthur Lupia, and Markus Prior. 2006. Public ignorance and estate tax repeal: The effect of partisan differences and survey incentives. National Tax Journal LIX (3): 425–437.Google Scholar
  29. Lakoff, George. 2004. Don’t think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction: Chelsea Green Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Le Grand, Julian, and David Nissan. 2000. A capital idea: Start-up grants for young people. London: Fabian Society.Google Scholar
  31. Levine, Art. 2006. The Paris Hilton tax cut: Call your senators now. http://www.huffingtonpost.com/art-levine/the-paris-hilton-tax-call_b_22453.html. Accessed 25 April 2014.
  32. Löfgren, Ǻsa, and Katarina Nordblom. 2009. Puzzling tax attitudes and labels. Applied Economic Letters 16:1809–1812.Google Scholar
  33. McCaffery, Edward. 1994. The political liberal case against the estate tax. Philosophy and Public Affairs 23 (4): 281–312Google Scholar
  34. McCaffery, Edward, and Jonathan Baron. 2003. The Humpty Dumpty blues: Disaggregation bias in the evaluation of tax systems. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 91:230–242.Google Scholar
  35. McCaffery, Edward, and Jonathan Baron. 2004. Framing and taxation: Evaluation of tax policies involving household composition. Journal of Economic Psychology 25:679–705.Google Scholar
  36. Mirrlees, James. 1976. Optimal tax theory: A synthesis. Journal of Public Economics 6:327–358.Google Scholar
  37. Mirrlees, James, Stuart Adam, Tim Besley, Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond, Robert Chote, Malcolm Gammie, Paul Johnson, Gareth Myles, and James Poterba. 2010. Tax by design: The Mirrlees review. Conclusions and recommendations for reform. http://www.ifs.org.uk/mirrleesreview/pamphlet.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2014.
  38. Mirrlees, James, Stuart Adam, Tim Besley, Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond, Robert Chote, Malcolm Gammie, Paul Johnson, Gareth Myles, and James Poterba. 2011. Tax by design. http://www.ifs.org.uk/mirrleesreview/design/taxbydesign.pdf. Accessed 25 April 2014.
  39. Murphy, Liam, and Thomas Nagel. 2002. The myth of ownership. Taxes and justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Osborne, George. 2007. It’s time for aspiration. Speech at Conservative party conference, 1 October. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7022498.stm Accessed 25 April 2014.
  41. Robinson, Nick. 2003. Fuel protests: Governing the ungovernable. Parliamentary Affairs 56 (3): 423–440.Google Scholar
  42. Rowlingson, Karen. 2008. Is the death of inheritance tax inevitable? Lessons from America. Political Quarterly 79 (2): 153–161.Google Scholar
  43. Rowlingson, Karen, and Stephen McKay. 2005. Attitudes to inheritance in Britain. Bristol: Policy Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sachweh, Patrick and Sigrun Olafsdottir. 2012. The welfare state and equality? Stratification realities and aspirations in three welfare regimes. European Sociological Review. 28(2): 149–168.Google Scholar
  45. Sen, Amartya. 1990. Rational fools: A critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory. In Beyond self-interest, ed. Jane Mansbridge, 25–43. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Slemrod, Joel. 1990. Optimal taxation and optimal tax systems. Journal of Economic Perspectives 4 (1): 157–178.Google Scholar
  47. Slemrod, Joel. 2006. The role of misconceptions in support of regressive tax reform. National Tax Journal LIX (1): 57–75.Google Scholar
  48. Thaler, Richard, and Cass Sunstein. 2008. Nudge. Improving decisions about health, wealth and happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Torgler, Benno, and Friedrich Schneider. 2007. What shapes attitudes toward paying taxes? Evidence from multicultural European countries. Social Science Quarterly 88 (2): 443–470.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Social SciencesOpen UniversityMilton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations