Evaluation of CO2 Abatement Measures for (Bio-) Fuel Production

Conference paper
First Online:
Part of the Lecture Notes in Logistics book series (LNLO)

Abstract

A decision support framework is presented to facilitate the political decision maker by finding an emission minimal and economic reasonable long-term policy strategy for the regulation of the (bio-) fuel sector. Thus, a dynamic, bi-criteria, technology and blending model is developed to optimize economic and ecological objectives simultaneously. As result, the Pareto efficient frontier of eco-efficient solutions is calculated. The model is applied to a case study of the German (bio-) diesel market.

Keywords

Biofuel Production Ecological Footprint Fuel Blend Generation Biofuel Diesel Blending 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. 2009/28/EC Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Brussels 2009: On the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/ECGoogle Scholar
  2. 2009/30/EC Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Brussels 2009: Amending Directive 98/70/EC as regards the specification of petrol, diesel and gas-oil and introducing a mechanism to monitor and reduce greenhouse gas emissions and amending Council Directive 1999/32/EC as regards the specification of fuel used by inland waterway vessels and repealing Directive 93/12/EECGoogle Scholar
  3. 2010/335/EU THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION, 2010: On guidelines for the calculation of land carbon stocks for the purpose of Annex V to Directive 2009/28/ECGoogle Scholar
  4. Bérubé J-F, Gendreau M, Potvin J-Y (2009) An exact ε-constraint method for bi-objective combinational optimization problems: application to the traveling salesman problem with profits. Eur J Oper Res 194:39–50CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. Bundesministerium für Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Verbraucherschutz (2012) Länderbericht ArgentinienGoogle Scholar
  6. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Brussels (2001) A sustainable Europe for a better world: a European union strategy for sustainable developmentGoogle Scholar
  7. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, Brussels (2012) Amending directive 98/70/EC relating to the quality of petrol and diesel fuels an demanding Directive 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sourcesGoogle Scholar
  8. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum (2012) Monitoring Biokraftstoffsektor. Deutsches Biomasseforschungszentrum Report Nr. 11. Last viewed on 30 Apr 2013 from http://www.dbfz.de/web/fileadmin/user_upload/DBFZ_Reports/Report_11_FINAL.pdf
  9. Deutsche Energie-Agentur (2013) Hintergrundpapier: Energieverbrauch und Energieträger im Straßenverkehr bis 2025Google Scholar
  10. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe (2012) Basisdaten Bioenergie Deutschland. Last viewed on 30 Apr 2013, Nachwachsende-rohstoffe.deGoogle Scholar
  11. Harmonized Calculations of Biofuel Greenhouse Gas Emissions in Europe (2011) BioGrace biofuel GHG calculation tool version 4b—public. Last viewed on 28 Feb 2013 from http://www.biograce.net
  12. Institut für Energie- und Umweltforschung Heidelberg GmbH (2004) CO2-neutrale Wege zukünftiger Mobilität durch Biokraftstoffe – eine Bestandsaufnahme - Endbericht. Last viewed on 28 Feb 2013 from http://www.co2star.eu/publications/ifeu_berichte/Co2_neutrale_Wege.pdf
  13. International Energy Agency (2012) CO2 emissions from fuel combustion—highlights. Last viewed on 28 Feb 2013 from http://www.iea.org/publications/freepublications/publication/CO2emissionfromfuelcombustionHIGHLIGHTS.pdf
  14. Kickhäfer K (2013) Marktsimulation zur strategischen Planung von Produktportfolios – Dargestellt am Beispiel innovativer Antriebe in der Automobilindustrie. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  15. Mineralölwirtschaftsverband eV (2011) MWV-Prognose 2025 für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Last viewed 28 Feb 2013 from http://www.mwv.de/upload/statistiken/info110622_Prognose_2025_vGz4jVRjg9gJGKN.pdf
  16. Mock P (2010) Entwicklung eines Szenariomodells zur Simulation der zukünftigen Marktanteile und CO2-Emissionen von Kraftfahrzeugen (VECTOR21). Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und RaumfahrtGoogle Scholar
  17. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008) Biofuel support policies: an economic assessment. Last viewed on 28 Feb 2013 from http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-Management/oecd/energy/biofuel-support-policies-an-economic-assessment_9789264050112-en
  18. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (2012) OECD-FAO agricultural outlook 2012–2021Google Scholar
  19. Renewable fuels for advanced powertrains (2008) (D5.2.10) Life cycle assessment of BTL-fuel production. (D5.3.6) Biomass provision costs—final report. (D5.01.07) Energy crops potential inventory results, (D5.01.03) Residue biomass potential inventory results. Last viewed on 28 Feb 2013 from http://www.renew-fuel.com/home.php
  20. Schatka A (2011) Strategische Netzwerkgestaltung in der Prozessindustrie – Eine Untersuchung am Beispiel der Produktion von synthetischen Biokraftstoffen. Gabler, WiesbadenGoogle Scholar
  21. Sorda G, Banse M, Kemfert C (2010) An overview of biofuel policies across the world. Energ Policy 38:6977–6988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Statistisches Bundesamt (2012) Anbaufläche von Energiepflanzen in Deutschland; Statistisches Bundesamt, 2012: Preise - Daten zur Energiepreisentwicklung - Lange Reihen von Januar 2000 bis Oktober 2012Google Scholar
  23. Union zur Förderung von Oel- und Proteinpflanzen ev (2012) Biodiesel 2011/2012 – Schabestandbericht und Perspektive – Auszug aus dem UFOP-JahresberichtGoogle Scholar
  24. Walther G, Schatka A, Spengler TS (2012) Design of regional production networks for second generation synthetic bio-fuel—a case study in Northern Germany. Eur J Oper Res 218:280–292CrossRefMathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. Wiśniewski G, Kupczyk A, Suciński D (2008) Policy measures for effective and efficient support of biofuels in EU 27. REFUEL, Work Package 7: Policy strategy, deliverable D17. Last viewed on 07 Mar 2013 from http://eaci-projects.eu/iee/page/Page.jsp?op=project_detail&prid=1693&side=downloadablefiles
  26. Wuppertal Institut (2007) Sozial-ökologische Bewertung der stationären energetischen Nutzung von importierten Biokraftstoffen am Beispiel von PalmölGoogle Scholar
  27. Wuppertal Institut (2008) Nutzungskonkurrenzen bei Biomasse – Auswirkungen der verstärkten Nutzung von Biomasse im Energiebereich auf die stoffliche Nutzung in der Biomasse verarbeitenden Industrie und deren Wettbewerbsfähigkeit durch staatlich induzierte FörderungGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Operations ManagementRWTH Aachen UniversityAachenGermany

Personalised recommendations