Advertisement

Product Orientation: the no Fear Strategy

  • Robert A. DeMarais
Conference paper
Part of the Developments in Marketing Science: Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science book series (DMSPAMS)

Abstract

Marketing writers seem to take one of three approaches to product orientation: denigrate it; ignore it; or claim it is part of the marketing concept. In this literature review, product orientation emerges as the province of the bold, proactive risk-taker. Caring not that the source, use, or acceptance of invention is unpredictable, the entrepreneur assumes customers will adapt to the new product. Product orientation calls for active market experimentation, educating customers, and a belief that, rather than adapting to the environment, one can change it.

Keywords

Market Research Product Innovation Customer Orientation Harvard Business Review Product Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, Lawrence. 1955. Quality and Competition: An Essay in Economic Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Ansoff, H. Igor and John M. Stewart. 1967. "Strategies for a Technology-Based Business." Harvard Business Review (November-December): 71–83.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, Roger C. and Robert G. Cooper. 1979. "Beyond the Marketing Concept." Business Horizons (June): 76–83.Google Scholar
  4. —and—. 1981. "The Misuse of Marketing: An American Tragedy." Business Horizons 24 (November-December): 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Canning, Gordon Jr. 1988. "Is Your Company Market Oriented?" Journal of Business Strategy 9 (May/June): 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chamberlin, Edward. 1933. The Theory of Monopolistic Competition. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, John Maurice. 1927. "Adam Smith and the Spirit of ’76." in The Spirit of ’76 and Other Essays. New York: Kelley, 61–98.Google Scholar
  8. —. 1961. Competition as a Dynamic Process. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  9. Drucker, Peter F. 1954. The Practice of Management. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
  10. —. 1990. "Marketing 101 for a Fast-Changing Decade." Wall Street Journal (November 20): 20A.Google Scholar
  11. Hooley, Graham J., James E. Lynch, and Jenny Shepherd. 1990. "The Marketing Concept: Putting Theory into Practice." European Journal of Marketing 24–9: 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hornby, William H. 1976. "Beware the Market Thinkers: Are Newspapers Forgetting They’re in the NEWS Business." Quill, (January): 14–17.Google Scholar
  13. Houston, Frank S. 1986. "The Marketing Concept: What It Is and What It Is Not." Journal of Marketing 50 (April): 81–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jewkes, John, David Sawers, and Richard Stillerman. 1969. The Sources of Invention. Second Edition. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
  15. Kerby, Joe Kent. 1972. "The Marketing Concept: Suitable Guide to Product Strategy." The Business Quarterly 37 (Summer): 31–35.Google Scholar
  16. Kiel, Geoffrey. 1984. "Technology and Marketing: The Magic Mix?" Business Horizons 27–3 (May-June): 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kotler, Philip. 1988. Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation, and Control. Englewood Clifts NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Lazo, Hector. 1958. "Big Business Gives Big OK to Marketing Management." Sales Management (November 21): 33–35 & 86–88.Google Scholar
  19. Levitt, Theodore. 1960. "Marketing Myopia." Harvard Business Review 38–4 (July-August): 45–56.Google Scholar
  20. —. 1986. The Marketing Imagination. New York: The Free Press: 167–172.Google Scholar
  21. McKenna, Regis. 1991. "Marketing is Everything." Harvard Business Review 69 (January-February): 65–79.Google Scholar
  22. Nayal, P. Ranganath and John M. Ketteringham. 1986. Breakthroughs! New York: Rawson Associates.Google Scholar
  23. Prahalad, C. K. and Gary Hamel. 1990. "The Core Competence of the Corporation." Harvard Business Review 68–3 (May-June): 79–91.Google Scholar
  24. —and—. 1991. "Corporate Imagination and Expeditionary Marketing." Harvard Business Review 69–4 (July-August): 81–82.Google Scholar
  25. Ries, Al and Jack Trout. 1990. Bottom-Up Marketing. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  26. Riesz, Peter C. 1980. "Revenge of the Marketing Concept." Business Horizons (June): 49–53.Google Scholar
  27. Scherer, F. M. 1984. Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  28. Schmenner, Roger W. and Robert H. Hayes. 1978. "How Should You Organize Manufacturing?" Harvard Business Review (January-February): 105–118.Google Scholar
  29. Schnaars, Steven P. 1989. Megamistakes: Forecasting and the Myth of Rapid Technological Change. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  30. —. 1991. Marketing Strategy: A Customer-Driven Approach. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  31. Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1936. The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profits, Capital, Credit, Interest, and the Business Cycle. Translated by Redvers Opie. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press: xi-9, 56–95, 128–157.Google Scholar
  32. —. 1950, Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper Brothers.Google Scholar
  33. Tarde, Gabriel. 1903. The Laws in Imitation. Translated from the Second French Edition by Elsie Clews Parsons. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
  34. Tauber, Edward M. 1974. "How Market Research Discourages Major Innovation." Business Horizons (June): 22–26.Google Scholar
  35. Utterback, James M. and William J. Abernathy. 1975. "A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation." Omega 3–6: 639–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Academy of Marketing Science 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert A. DeMarais
    • 1
  1. 1.Arkansas Tech UniversityBaton RougeUSA

Personalised recommendations