Towards an Evaluation of a Metadata Standard for Generative Virtual Museums

  • Daniel Sacher
  • Benjamin Weyers
  • Daniel Biella
  • Wolfram Luther
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8867)

Abstract

A methodology for evaluating the ViMCOX metadata format for designing virtual museums is discussed. Two evaluation approaches are presented, addressing (1) design aspects of virtual museums, the completeness of the metadata from the visitor’s point of view as well as measuring the acceptance of virtual museums and (2) a qualitative survey in collaboration with museum experts to identify metadata requirements and feature sets for curator tool implementations.

Keywords

Virtual Museum 3D Museum Evaluation Virtual Museum Feature Set Survey Curator Survey ViMEDEAS ViMCOX Replicave 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Sacher, D., Biella, D., Luther, W.: Towards a versatile metadata exchange format for digital museum collections. In: Proc. of the 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress, pp. 129–136 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sacher, D., Biella, D., Luther, W.: A Generative Approach to Virtual Museums. In: WEBIST, pp. 274–279. SciTePress (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Biella, D., Luther, W., Baloian, N.: Virtual Museum Exhibition Designer Using Enhanced ARCO Standard. In: XXIX Int. Conf. of the Chilean Computer Science Society (SCCC), pp. 226–235 (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Biella, D., Luther, W., Sacher, D.: Schema Migration Into A Web-based Framework for Generating Virtual Museums and Laboratories. In: 18th Int. Conf. on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), pp. 307–314 (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Biella, D., Luther, W., Baloian, N.: Beyond the ARCO standard. In: 16th Int. Conf. on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), pp. 184–191 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sacher, D., Brocke, M., Heitmann, M., Kaufhold, B., Luther, W., Biella, D.: The Virtual Leopold Fleischhacker Museum. In: Museums and the Web: Proc. (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ronzino, P., Amico, N., Niccoluccin, F.: Assessment and comparison of metadata schemas for architectural heritage. In: Proc. of CIPA (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D’Alba, A., Jones, G.: Analyzing participants’ perceptions, attitudes, and knowledge outcomes in an art museum tour, after using a 3dimensional virtual museum. In: Proc. of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (2013)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sylaiou, S., Economou, M., Karoulis, A., White, M.: The Evaluation of ARCO: A Lesson in Curatorial Competence and Intuition with New Technology. Comput. Entertain. 6(2), 23:1–23:18 (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gockel, B., Graf, H., Pagano, A., Pescarin, S., Eriksson, J.: VMUXE. In: Marcus, A. (ed.) DUXU/HCII 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 8012, pp. 262–272. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pescarin, S., Pagano, A., Wallergård, M., Hupperetz, W., Ray, C.: Evaluating virtual museums: Archeovirtual case study. Archaeology in the Digital Era, 74 (2012)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schweibenz, W.: Who are the Visitors of the Virtual Museum and What are they Interested in? i-com, 7(2), 11–17 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Dachselt, R.: Eine deklarative Komponentenarchitektur und Interaktionsbausteine für dreidimensionale multimediale Anwendungen. Der Andere Verlag (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chittaro, L., Ieronutti, L., Ranon, R.: VEX-CMS: A tool to design virtual exhibitions and walkthroughs that integrates automatic camera control capabilities. In: Taylor, R., Boulanger, P., Krüger, A., Olivier, P. (eds.) SG 2010. LNCS, vol. 6133, pp. 103–114. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gomes, J., Carmo, M., Claudio, A.: Creating and Assembling Virtual Exhibitions from Existing X3D Models (2011), http://docs.di.fc.ul.pt/handle/10455/6748
  16. 16.
    McKenna, G., De Loof, C.: ATHENA D3.1 Report on existing standards applied by European museums (2010), http://www.athenaeurope.org/getFile.php?id=396
  17. 17.
    Pescarin, S., Wallergird, M., Hupperetz, W., Pagano, A., Ray, C.: Archeovirtual 2011: An evaluation approach to virtual museums. In: 8th Int. Conf. on Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), pp. 25–32 (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniel Sacher
    • 1
  • Benjamin Weyers
    • 2
  • Daniel Biella
    • 1
  • Wolfram Luther
    • 1
  1. 1.Computer and Cognitive Science (INKO) and Center for Information and Media Services (CIM)University of Duisburg-EssenGermany
  2. 2.Virtual Reality GroupRWTH Aachen UniversityGermany

Personalised recommendations