Advertisement

An FPTAS for the Volume Computationof 0-1 Knapsack Polytopes Based on Approximate Convolution Integral

  • Ei AndoEmail author
  • Shuji Kijima
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8889)

Abstract

Computing high dimensional volumes is a hard problem, even for approximation. It is known that no polynomial-time deterministic algorithm can approximate with ratio \(1.999^n\) the volumes of convex bodies in the \(n\) dimension as given by membership oracles. Several randomized approximation techniques for #P-hard problems has been developed in the three decades, while some deterministic approximation algorithms are recently developed only for a few #P-hard problems. For instance, Stefankovic, Vempala and Vigoda (2012) gave an FPTAS for counting 0-1 knapsack solutions (i.e., integer points in a 0-1 knapsack polytope) based on an ingenious dynamic programming. Motivated by a new technique for designing FPTAS for #P-hard problems, this paper is concerned with the volume computation of \(0\)-\(1\) knapsack polytopes: it is given by \(\{{\varvec{x}} \in \mathbb {R}^n \mid {\varvec{a}}^{\top } {\varvec{x}} \le b,\ 0 \le x_i \le 1\ (i=1,\ldots ,n)\}\) with a positive integer vector \({\varvec{a}}\) and a positive integer \(b\) as an input, the volume computation of which is known to be #P-hard. Li and Shi (2014) gave an FPTAS for the problem by modifying the dynamic programming for counting solutions. This paper presents a new technique based on approximate convolution integral for a deterministic approximation of volume computations, and provides an FPTAS for the volume computation of 0-1 knapsack polytopes.

Keywords

Approximate convolution integral Volume computation #P-hard Knapsack polytope 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bandyopadhyay, A., Gamarnik, D.: Counting without sampling: asymptotics of the log-partition function for certain statistical physics models. Random Structures and Algorithms 33, 452–479 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bárány, I., Füredi, Z.: Computing the volume is difficult. Discrete Computational Geometry 2, 319–326 (1987)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bayati, M., Gamarnik, D., Katz, D., Nair, C., Tetali, P.: Simple deterministic approximation algorithms for counting matchings. In: Proc. of STOC 2007, pp. 122–127 (2007)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dyer, M.: Approximate counting by dynamic programming. In: Proc. of STOC 2003, pp. 693–699 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dyer, M., Frieze, A.: On the complexity of computing the volume of a polyhedron. SIAM Journal on Computing 17(5), 967–974 (1988)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dyer, M., Frieze, A., Kannan, R.: A random polynomial-time algorithm for approximating the volume of convex bodies. Journal of the Association for Computing Machinery 38(1), 1–17 (1991)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elekes, G.: A geometric inequality and the complexity of computing volume. Discrete Computational Geometry 1, 289–292 (1986)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gamarnik, D., Katz, D.: Correlation decay and deterministic FPTAS for counting list-colorings of a graph. In: Proc. of SODA 2007, pp. 1245–1254 (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gopalan, P., Klivans, A., Meka, R.: Polynomial-time approximation schemes for knapsack and related counting problems using branching programs, arXiv:1008.3187v1 (2010)
  10. 10.
    Gopalan, P., Klivans, A., Meka, R., Štefankovič, D., Vempala, S., Vigoda, E.: An FPTAS for #knapsack and related counting problems. In: Proc. of FOCS 2011, pp. 817–826 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ko, K.-I.: Complexity Theory of Real Functions. Birkhäuser, Boston (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, L., Lu, P., Yin, Y.: Approximate counting via correlation decay in spin systems. In: Proc. of SODA 2012, pp. 922–940 (2012)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Li, L., Lu, P., Yin, Y.: Correlation decay up to uniqueness in spin systems. In: Proc. of SODA 2013, pp. 67–84 (2013)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, J., Shi, T.: A fully polynomial-time approximation scheme for approximating a sum of random variables. Operations Research Letters 42, 197–202 (2014)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Lin, C., Liu, J., Lu, P.: A simple FPTAS for counting edge covers. In: Proc. of SODA 2014, pp. 341–348 (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lovász, L.: An Algorithmic Theory of Numbers, Graphs and Convexity. SIAM Society for industrial and applied mathematics, Philadelphia (1986)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lovász, L., Vempala, S.: Simulated annealing in convex bodies and an \(O^\ast (n^4)\) volume algorithm. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 72, 392–417 (2006)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitra, S.: On the probability distribution of the sum of uniformly distributed random variables. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics 20(2), 195–198 (1971)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Štefankovič, D., Vempala, S., Vigoda, E.: A deterministic polynomial-time approximation scheme for counting knapsack solutions. SIAM Journal on Computing 41(2), 356–366 (2012)CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Weihrauch, K.: Computable Analysis An Introduction. Springer, Berlin (2000)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weitz, D.: Counting independent sets up to the tree threshold. In: Proc. STOC 2006, pp. 140–149 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sojo UniversityNishi-Ku, KumamotoJapan
  2. 2.Kyushu UniversityNishi-Ku, FukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations