Advertisement

An Agile Implementation within a Medical Device Software Organisation

  • Martin McHugh
  • Fergal McCaffery
  • Garret Coady
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 477)

Abstract

Three surveys conducted over a 6 year period revealed that medical device software organisations have difficulties in the area of requirements management, namely accommodating changes in requirements. Medical device software is traditionally developed in accordance with a plan driven software development lifecycle (SDLC). These SDLCs are rigid and inflexible to changes once the requirements management stage has been completed. Agile methods are gaining momentum in non-regulated industries but as of yet, the adoption of these methods in regulated industries such as the medical device software domain remains low. This study presents an implementation of agile methods within a medical device software development organisation based in Ireland. This implementation involved integrating agile practices with a traditional plan driven SDLC. Upon completing this implementation within a medical device software development project, the organisation identified cost savings and a reduction in the rework required when introducing a change in requirements.

Keywords

Agile SDLC Medical AV-Model Hybrid IEC 62304 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Denger, C., Feldman, R.L., Host, M., Lindholm, C., Schull, F.: A Snapshot of the State of Practice in Software Development for Medical Devices. Presented at the First International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, ESEM 2007, Madrid (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Embedded Forecasters, Embedded Market Forecasters Survey Ashland, MA (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    McCaffery, F., McFall, D., Donnelly, P., Wilkie, F.G., Sterritt, R.: A Software Process Improvement Lifecycle Framework for the Medical Device Industry. Presented at the Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference and Workshops on the Engineering of Computer-Based Systems, ECBS 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    McHugh, M., McCaffery, F., Casey, V.: Barriers to Adopting Agile Practices when Developing Medical Device Software. In: Mas, A., Mesquida, A., Rout, T., O’Connor, R.V., Dorling, A. (eds.) SPICE 2012. CCIS, vol. 290, pp. 141–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    VersionOne, 6th Annual State of Agile Survey (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McHugh, M., Cawley, O., McCaffery, F., Richardson, I., Wang, X.: An Agile V-Model for Medical Device Software Development to Overcome the Challenges with Plan-Driven Software Development Lifecycles. In: Software Engineering in Healthcare (SEHC) Workshop at the 35th International Confernence on Software Engineering (ICSE), San Francisco CA (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rasmussen, R., Hughes, T., Jenks, J.R., Skach, J.: Adopting Agile in an FDA Regulated Environment. In: Agile Conference, AGILE 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faris, T.H.: Safe And Sound Software: Creating an Efficient and Effective Quality System for Software Medical Device Organizations. Asq Press (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    McHugh, M., Ali, A.-R., McCaffery, F.: Challeneges experieced by medical device software development organisations when following a plan driven Software Development Lifecycle. Presented at the European Systems and Software Process Improvement and Innovation Conference (EuroSPI), Dundalk, Ireland (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Heeager, L.T., Nielsen, P.A.: Agile Software Development and its Compatibility with a Document-Driven Approach? A Case Study. Presented at the 20th Australasian Conference on Information Systems Compatibility of Agile and Document-Driven Approaches, Melbourne (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nerur, S., Mahapatra, R., Mangalaraj, G.: Challenges of migrating to agile methodologies. ACM Communications 48, 72–78 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    U. Food and D. Administration,Premarket notification (510k), ed. (2010) Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Paetsch, F., Eberlein, A., Maurer, F.: Requirements engineering and agile software development. Presented at the Proceedings of Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises, WET ICE 2003 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Vogel, D.: Agile Methods: Most are not ready for prime time in medical device software design and development. DesignFax Online 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Spence, J.W.: There has to be a better way! (software development). In: Agile Conference, 2005, Denver (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Weyrauch, K.: What Are We Arguing About? A Framework for Defining Agile in our Organization. Presented at the Proceedings of the Conference on AGILE 2006 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rottier, P.A., Rodrigues, V.: Agile Development in a Medical Device Company. Presented at the Proceedings of the 11th AGILE Conference, AGILE 2008 (2008)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ge, X., Paige, R.F., McDermid, J.A.: An Iterative Approach for Development of Safety-Critical Software and Safety Arguments. In: Agile 2010 (2010)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    AAMI, AAMI TIR45:2012 – Guidance on the use of agile practices in the development of medical device software. In: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation, Arlington, VA (2012)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fitzgerald, B., Hartnett, G., Conboy, K.: Customising agile methods software practices intel shannon. European Journal of Infornation Systems 15, 200–213 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dawson, C.: Introduction to Research Methods: A Practical Guide for Anyone Undertaking a Research Project. Constable & Robinson, London (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    McHugh, M., McCaffery, F., Fitzgerald, B., Stol, K.J., Casey, V., Coady, G.: Balancing Agility and Discipline in a Medical Device Software Organisation. Presented at the 13th International Conference Process Improvement and Capability Determination, Bremen (2013)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin McHugh
    • 1
  • Fergal McCaffery
    • 1
  • Garret Coady
    • 2
  1. 1.Regulated Software Research CentreDundalk Institute of TechnologyDundalkIreland
  2. 2.BlueBridge TechnologiesDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations