It From Bit or Bit From It? pp 5-23 | Cite as

# “It from Bit” and the Quantum Probability Rule

## Abstract

I argue that, on the subjective Bayesian interpretation of probability, “it from bit” requires a generalization of probability theory. This does not get us all the way to the quantum probability rule because an extra constraint, known as noncontextuality, is required. I outline the prospects for a derivation of noncontextuality within this approach and argue that it requires a realist approach to physics, or “bit from it”. I then explain why this does not conflict with “it from bit”. This version of the essay includes an addendum responding to the open discussion that occurred on the FQXi website. It is otherwise identical to the version submitted to the contest.

## Keywords

Quantum Theory Boolean Algebra Wind Farm Fair Price Lottery Ticket## References

- 1.J.A. Wheeler, in
*Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Foundations of Quantum Mechanics in the Light of New Technology*, ed. by S. Kobayashi, H. Ezawa, Y. Murayama, S. Nomura (Physical Society of Japan, Tokyo, 1990), pp. 354–368Google Scholar - 2.J.A. Wheeler,
*in Problems in the Foundations of Physics: Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi”, Course LXXII*, ed. by G. Toraldo di Francia (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1979), pp. 395–492Google Scholar - 3.G. Birkhoff, J. von Neumann, Ann. Math.
**37**, 823 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 4.F.J. Murray, J. von Neumann, Ann. Math.
**37**, 116 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 5.M. Rédei, S.J. Summers, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys.
**38**, 390 (2007)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 6.M.S. Leifer, R.W. Spekkens, Phys. Rev. A
**88**, 052130 (2013). Eprint arXiv:1107.5849 - 7.D. Gillies,
*Philosophical Theories of Probability*(Routledge, New York, 2000)Google Scholar - 8.A. Eagle (ed.),
*Philosophy of Probability: Contemporary Readings*(Routledge, 2011)Google Scholar - 9.B. de Finetti, Fundamenta Mathematicae
**17**, 298 (1931)Google Scholar - 10.F.P. Ramsey,
*The Foundations of Mathemaics and Other Logical Essays*, ed. by R.B. Braithwaite (Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1931), pp. 156–198. Reprinted in [8]Google Scholar - 11.R. Jeffrey,
*Subjective Probability: The Real Thing*(Cambridge University Press, New York, 2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar - 12.C. Howson, P. Urbach,
*Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach*, 3rd edn. (Open Court, 2005)Google Scholar - 13.D. Lewis,
*Studies in Inductive Logic and Probability*, ed. by R.C. Jeffrey (University of California Press, 1980). Reprinted with postscript in [8]Google Scholar - 14.C.M. Caves, C.A. Fuchs, R. Schack, Phys. Rev. A
**65**, 022305 (2002)CrossRefADSMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 15.C.A. Fuchs, J. Mod. Opt.
**50**, 987 (2003)CrossRefADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 16.
- 17.C.A. Fuchs, QBism, perimeter quantum Bayesianism (2010). Eprint arXiv:1003.5209
- 18.D. Deutsch, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A
**455**, 3129 (1999). Eprint arXiv:quant-ph/9906015 - 19.D. Wallace, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys.
**38**, 311 (2007). Eprint arXiv:quant-ph/0312157 - 20.D. Wallace,
*Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality*, ed. by S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent, D. Wallace (Oxford University Press, 2010). Eprint arXiv:0906.2718 - 21.D. Wallace,
*The Emergent Multiverse*, (Oxford University Press, 2012)Google Scholar - 22.I. Pitowsky, Stud. Hist. Philos. Mod. Phys.
**34**, 395 (2003). Eprint arXiv:quant-ph/0208121 - 23.B. de Finetti,
*Philosophical Lectures on Probability*. Synthese Library vol. 340 (Springer, 2008)Google Scholar - 24.E.T. Jaynes,
*Probability Theory: The Logic of Science*(Cambridge University Press, 2003)Google Scholar - 25.D. Kahneman,
*Thinking, Fast and Slow*(Penguin, 2012)Google Scholar - 26.C.A.B. Smith, J. R. Stat. Soc. B Met.
**23**, 1 (1961)ADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 27.L.J. Savage,
*The Foundations of Statistics*, 2nd edn. (Dover, 1972)Google Scholar - 28.H. Greaves, W. Myrvold,
*Many Worlds?: Everett, Quantum Theory, and Reality*, ed. by S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent, D. Wallace (Oxford University Press, 2010), chap. 9, pp. 264–306Google Scholar - 29.J. Barrett, Phys. Rev. A
**75**, 032304 (2007). Eprint arXiv:quant-ph/0508211 - 30.S. Kochen, E.P. Specker, J. Math. Mech.
**17**, 59 (1967)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 31.W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett.
**90**, 120404 (2003). Eprint arXiv:quant-ph/0211037 - 32.W.H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. A
**71**, 052105 (2005). Eprint arXiv:quant-ph/0405161 - 33.FQXi comment thread for this essay (2013). http://fqxi.org/community/forum/topic/1821
- 34.A.M. Gleason, J. Math. Mech.
**6**, 885 (1957)zbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar - 35.J.S. Bell, Rev. Mod. Phys.
**38**, 447 (1966)CrossRefADSzbMATHGoogle Scholar - 36.A. Chakravartty,
*The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy*, ed. by E.N. Zalta (2014), Spring 2014 edn. URL: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2014/entries/scientific-realism/ - 37.J. Ladyman,
*Understanding Philosophy of Science*(Routledge, 2002)Google Scholar