Advertisement

Advanced Metaheuristics-Based Approach for Fuzzy Control Systems Tuning

  • Soufiene Bouallègue
  • Fatma ToumiEmail author
  • Joseph Haggège
  • Patrick Siarry
Chapter
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 319)

Abstract

In this study, a new advanced metaheuristics-based optimization approach is proposed and successfully applied to design and tuning of a PID-type Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC). The scaling factors tuning problem of the FLC structure is formulated and systematically resolved, using various constrained metaheuristics such as the Differential Search Algorithm (DSA), Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA), Artificial Bee Colony (ABC) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO). In order to specify more time-domain performance control objectives of the proposed metaheuristics-tuned PID-type FLC, different optimization criteria such as Integral of Square Error (ISE) and Maximum Overshoot (MO) are considered and compared The classical Genetic Algorithm Optimization (GAO) method is also used as a reference tool to measure the statistical performances of the proposed methods. All these algorithms are implemented and analyzed in order to show the superiority and the effectiveness of the proposed fuzzy control tuning approach. Simulation and real-time experimental results, for an electrical DC drive benchmark, show the advantages of the proposed metaheuristics-tuned PID-type fuzzy control structure in terms of performance and robustness.

Keywords

Particle Swarm Optimization Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm Fuzzy Controller Fuzzy Logic Controller Gravitational Search Algorithm 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Azar, A. T. (Ed.) (2010a). Fuzzy systems. Vienna, Austria: INTECH. ISBN 978-953-7619-92-3.Google Scholar
  2. Azar, A. T. (2010b). Adaptive neuro-fuzzy systems. In Fuzzy systems. Vienna, Austria: INTECH. ISBN 978-953-7619-92-3.Google Scholar
  3. Azar, A. T. (2012). Overview of type-2 fuzzy logic systems. International Journal of Fuzzy System Applications, 2(4), 1–28.Google Scholar
  4. Azar, A. T., & Serrano, F. E. (2014). Robust IMC-PID tuning for cascade control systems with gain and phase margin specifications. Neural Computing and Applications,. doi: 10.1007/s00521-014-1560-x.Google Scholar
  5. Basturk, B. & Karaboga, D. (2006). An artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for numeric function optimization. In Proceedings of IEEE Swarm Intelligence Symposium, May 12–14, Indianapolis, USA.Google Scholar
  6. Bouallègue, S., Haggège, J., Ayadi, M., & Benrejeb, M. (2012a). PID-type fuzzy logic controller tuning based on particle swarm optimization. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 25(3), 484–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bouallègue, S., Haggège, J., & Benrejeb, M. (2011). Particle swarm optimization-based fixed-structure \(\mathcal{H}_{\infty}\)control design. International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems, 9(2), 258–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bouallègue, S., Haggège, J., & Benrejeb, M. (2012b). A new method for tuning PID-type fuzzy controllers using particle swarm optimization. In Fuzzy Controllers: Recent Advances in Theory and Applications (pp. 139–162). Vienna, Austria: INTECH. ISBN 978-953-51-0759-0.Google Scholar
  9. Boussaid, I., Lepagnot, J., & Siarry, P. (2013). A survey on optimization metaheuristics. Information Sciences, 237(1), 82–117.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. Civicioglu, P. (2012). Transforming geocentric Cartesian coordinates to geodetic coordinates by using differential search algorithm. Computers and Geosciences, 46(1), 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. David, R. C., Precup, R. E., Petriu, E. M., Radac, M. B., & Preitl, S. (2013). Gravitational search algorithm-based design of fuzzy control systems with a reduced parametric sensitivity. Information Sciences, 247(1), 154–173.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. Dréo, J., Siarry, P., Pétrowski, A., & Taillard, E. (2006). Metaheuristics for Hard Optimization Methods and Case Studies. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Eberhart, R. & Kennedy, J. (1995). A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science (pp. 39–43), October 4–6, Nagoya, Japan.Google Scholar
  14. Eker, I., & Torun, Y. (2006). Fuzzy logic control to be conventional method. Energy Conversion and Management, 47(4), 377–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Goldberg, D. E. (1989). Genetic algorithms in search, optimization and machine learning. Boston: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  16. Goswami, D., & Chakraborty, S. (2014). Differential search algorithm-based parametric optimization of electrochemical micromachining processes. International Journal of Industrial Engineering Computations, 5(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Guzelkaya, M., Eksin, I., & Yesil, E. (2003). Self-tuning of PID type fuzzy logic controller coefficients via relative rate observer. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 16(3), 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Haggège, J., Ayadi, M., Bouallègue, S., & Benrejeb, M. (2010). Design of Fuzzy Flatness-based Controller for a DC Drive. Control and Intelligent Systems, 38(3), 164–172.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Haggège, J., Bouallègue, S., & Benrejeb, M. (2009). Robust \(\mathcal{H}_{\infty}\)Design for a DC Drive. International Review of Automatic Control, 2(4), 415–422.Google Scholar
  20. Karaboga, D. (2005). An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Technical report TR06, Erciyes University, Engineering Faculty, Computer Engineering Department, Turkey.Google Scholar
  21. Karaboga, D., & Akay, B. (2009). A comparative study of Artificial Bee Colony algorithm. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 214(1), 108–132.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. Karaboga, D., & Basturk, B. (2007). A powerful and efficient algorithm for numerical function optimization: artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Journal of Global Optimization, 39(3), 459–471.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  23. Karaboga, D., & Basturk, B. (2008). On the performance of artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm. Applied Soft Computing, 8(1), 687–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Karaboga, D., Gorkemli, B., Ozturk, C., & Karaboga, N. (2012). A comprehensive survey: Artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm and applications. Artificial Intelligent Review, 42, 21–57. doi: 10.1007/s10462-012-9328-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kennedy, J. and Eberhart, R. (1995). Particle swarm optimization. In Proceedings. of IEEE International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (pp. 1942–1948), November 27–December 01, Perth, Australia.Google Scholar
  26. Lee, C. C. (1998a). Fuzzy logic in control systems: Fuzzy logic controller-part I. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(2), 404–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee, C. C. (1998b). Fuzzy logic in control systems: Fuzzy logic controller-part II. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 20(2), 419–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Madiouni, R., Bouallègue, S., Haggège, J., & Siarry, P. (2013). Particle swarm optimization-based design of polynomial RST controllers. In Proceedings. of the 10th IEEE International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices (pp. 1–7), Hammamet, Tunisia.Google Scholar
  29. MathWorks. (2009). Genetic algorithm and direct search toolbox user’s guide.Google Scholar
  30. Nobahari, H., Nikusokhan, M., & Siarry, P. (2011). Non-dominated sorting gravitational search algorithm. In Proceedings. of the International conference on swarm intelligence (pp. 1–10), June 14–15, Cergy, France.Google Scholar
  31. Passino, K. M. & Yurkovich, S. (1998). Fuzzy control. Boston, Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  32. Precup, R. E., David, R. C., Petriu, E. M., Preitl, S., & Radac, M. B. (2011). Gravitational search algorithms in fuzzy control systems tuning. In Proceedings. of the 18th IFAC World Congress (pp. 13624–13629), August 28–September 02, Milano, Italy.Google Scholar
  33. Qiao, W. Z., & Mizumoto, M. (1996). PID type fuzzy controller and parameters adaptive method. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 78(1), 23–35.CrossRefzbMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  34. Rao, R. V. and Savsani, V. J. (2012). Mechanical design optimization using advanced optimization techniques. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-pour, H., & Saryazdi, S. (2009). GSA: A gravitational search algorithm. Information Sciences, 179(13), 2232–2248.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Siarry, P., & Michalewicz, Z. (2008). Advances in metaheuristics for hard optimization. New York: Springer.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. Toumi, F., Bouallègue, S., Haggège, J., & Siarry, P. (2014). Differential search algorithm-based approach for PID-type fuzzy controller tuning. In Proceedings. of the International Conference on Control, Engineering & Information Technology, March 22–25, Sousse, Tunisia.Google Scholar
  38. Waghole, V., & Tiwari, R. (2014). Optimization of needle roller bearing design using novel hybrid methods. Mechanism and Machine Theory, 72(1), 71–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Woo, Z. W., Chung, H. Y., & Lin, J. J. (2000). A PID type fuzzy controller with self-tuning scaling factors. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 115(2), 321–326.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Soufiene Bouallègue
    • 1
  • Fatma Toumi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Joseph Haggège
    • 1
  • Patrick Siarry
    • 2
  1. 1.Research Laboratory in Automatic Control LA.R.ANational Engineering School of Tunis (ENIT)TunisTunisia
  2. 2.Signals, Images and Intelligent Systems Laboratory, LiSSi-EA-3956University Paris-Est Créteil Val de MarneCréteilFrance

Personalised recommendations