Advertisement

Mobile Health pp 771-790 | Cite as

mHealth: WBANs’ Issues and Challenges

  • Saadi Boudjit
  • Hassine Moungla
Part of the Springer Series in Bio-/Neuroinformatics book series (SSBN, volume 5)

Abstract

Recent advances in wireless networked systems, intelligent low-power sensors and medical sensors, have led to the development and emergence of new embedded networks in the last years known as Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs). These WBANs carry the promise of expanding the quality of life and care across a large variety of healthcare applications. In this chapter, we will review two fundamental mechanisms of WBANs including data dissemination and sensor deployment. A bi-objective nonlinear non-convex model based on a Min-Max formulation is proposed for deployment issue. On the other hand, a trade-off between energy consumption and the number of hops in the network was proposed for the purpose of data dissemination. The common objective of these two main proposals is saving energy and hence increasing network lifetime.

Keywords

Sensor Node Wireless Sensor Network Wireless Body Area Network Central Device Optimize Link State Route 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Patel, M., Wang, J.: Applications, challenges and prospective in emerging body area networking technologies. IEEE Wireless Communications 17(1), 80–88 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ullah, S., et al.: A comprehensive survey of Wireless Body Area Networks. Journal Med. Syst. (published online, August 2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Latre, B., Moerman, I., Dhoedt, B., Demeester, P.: Networking in Wireless Body Area Networks. In: 5th FTWPHD Symposium (2004)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wang, Q., Hempstead, M., Yang, W.: A Realistic Power Consumption Model for Wireless Sensor Network Devices. In: IEEE Comm. Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad hoc Communications and Networks (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Anastasi, G., et al.: Performance Measurements of Motes Sensor Networks. In: International Workshop on Modeling Analysis and Simulation of Wireless and Mobile Systems (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chipcon AS. CC2420 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee-ready RF Transceiver (2007), http://inst.eecs.berkeley.edu/cs150/ (retrieved October 2009)
  7. 7.
    Network Simulator 2 (n.d.), http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/
  8. 8.
    Chipcon AS. CC1000 Single Chip Very Low Power RF Transceiver (2007), http://focus.ti.com/lit/ds/symlink/cc1000.pdf (retrieved October 2009)
  9. 9.
    Crossbow Technology MICA2 Motes, http://www.xbow.com (retrieved June 2009)
  10. 10.
    Heinzelman, W.R., Chandrakasan, A., Balakrishnan, H.: Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Yang, S., Li, M., Wu, J.: Scan-Based Movement-Assisted Sensor Deployment Methods in Wireless Sensor Networks. IEEE Trans. on Parallel and Distributed Systems 18(8), 1108–1121 (2007)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Senouci, M.R., Abdelhamid, M., Assnoune, K.: Localized Movement-Assisted Sensor Deployment Algorithm for Hole Detection and Healing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems (May 29, 2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Oldewurtel, F., Riihijarvi, J., Mahonen, P.: Impact of Correlation in Node Locations on the Performance of Distributed Compression. In: Proceedings of the WONS, Snowbird, USA, pp. 135–142 (2009)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Özdemir, S., Attea, B.A., Khalil, Ö.A.: Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm Based on Decomposition for Energy Efficient Coverage in Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Personal Communications 71(1), 195–215 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Deb, K.: Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. Wiley and Sons (2002) ISBN: 978-0-471-87339-6Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ren, H., Meng, M.Q.H.: Rate control to reduce bioeffects in wireless biomedical sensor networks. In: 3rd Annual International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems - Workshops, San Jose, CA, pp. 1–7 (July 2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhou, G., He, T., Krishnamurthy, S., Stankovic, J.A.: Models and solutions for radio irregularity in wireless sensor networks. ACM Trans. Sen. Netw. 2(2), 221–262 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ramos, H.S., Zhang, T., Liu, J., Priyantha, B., Kansal, A.: LEAP: A Low Energy Assisted GPS for Trajectory-Based Services. In: 13th ACM International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp), September 17. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Jacquet, P., Muhlethaler, P., Minet, P., Qayyum, A., Laouiti, A., Clausen, T., Viennot, L., Adjih, C.: Optimized Link State Routing Protocol - Internet Engineering Task Force – Manet Group, RFC 3626 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    IEEE 802.15.6WPAN Task Group 6 (TG6) – Body Area Networks, http://www.ieee802.org/15/pub/TG6.html

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Paris 13, Sorbonne Paris CitéVilletaneuseFrance
  2. 2.University of Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris CitéParisFrance

Personalised recommendations