Advertisement

Meteotsunami forecasting: sensitivities demonstrated by the 2008 Boothbay, Maine, event

  • P. Whitmore
  • B. Knight
Original Paper

Abstract

To support development of a meteotsunami forecasting capability for the USA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration funded a project in 2011 focused on meteotsunami forecasting for the US east coast. Meteotsunami forecasting shares many similarities with traditional tsunami forecasting, though the characterization and integration of the source with numerical forecast models is much different. Given meteotsunami source characterization through atmospheric observations and models, it is conceivable that meteotsunami alerts could be issued and their impact forecasted using existing tsunami forecast models with high-resolution coastal definition. To test this, the 2008 Boothbay, Maine, meteotsunami is simulated using an atmospheric source consisting of a moving pressure disturbance coupled with a tsunami forecast model. Sensitivities of the modeled impact to the source characteristics, such as speed, wavelength, and direction, are also tested. Results show that the observed impact can be re-created through numerical modeling when the pressure disturbance period is roughly matched with the harbor resonance and observed meteotsunami period.

Keywords

Meteotsunami Meteotsunami forecast Tsunami forecasting Boothbay 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the members of the international TMEWS team for their diligent efforts in researching the source characteristics of east coast and other meteotsunamis; the NWS Tsunami Program, especially former Program Manager Jen Rhoades, for its support for the TMEWS project; Frank Kelly and Carven Scott of the NWS Alaska Region for early support for the investigation; John Jensenius, Bart Hagemeyer, and Scott Spratt of the NWS Eastern and Southern Region for supplying observational data where possible; and Fred Stephenson, Guy Urban, David Nyland, and one anonymous reviewer for constructive reviews of the report.

References

  1. Anderson EJ, Schwab DJ, Lombardy KA, LaPlante RE (2012) Detection and Modeling of a meteotsunami in Lake Erie during a high wind event on May 27, 2012. AGU Fall Meeting 2012 NH23B-1621Google Scholar
  2. Asano T, Yamashiro T, Nishimura N (2012) Field observations of meteotsunami in Kami-koshiki Island, Japan. AGU Fall Meeting 2012 NH23B-1622Google Scholar
  3. Candella RN (2009) Meteorologically induced strong seiches observed at Arraial do Cabo, RJ Brazil. Phys Chem Earth 34:989–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Churchill DD, Houston SH, Bond NA (1995) The Daytona Beach Wave of 3-4 July 1992: a shallow-water gravity wave forced by a propagating squall line. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 76:21–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dragani WC, D’Onofrio EE, Grismeyer W, Fiore MME, Campos MI (2009) Atmospherically-induced water oscillations detected in the port of Quequen, Buenos Aires, Argentina. Phys Chem Earth 34:998–1008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goring GG (2009) Meteotsunami resulting from the propagation of synoptic-scale weather systems. Phys Chem Earth 34:1009–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hirt C, Nichols B (1981) Volume of fluid (VOF) method for the dynamics of free boundaries. J Comput Phys 39:201–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jansa A, Monserrat S, Gomis D (2007) The rissaga of 15 June 2006 in Ciutadella (Menorca), a meteorological tsunami. Adv Geosci 12:1–4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knight B, Kowalik Z, Whitmore P (2012) ATFM (Alaska Tsunami Forecast Model). In: National Tsunami Hazard Mitigation Program Proceedings and Results of the 2011 NTHMP Model Benchmarking Workshop. US Dept. Of Commerce/NOAA/NTHMP; NOAA Special Report 89-104, BoulderGoogle Scholar
  10. Kowalik Z, Murty T (1993) Numerical modeling of ocean dynamics. World Scientific Press, Singapore, 481 ppGoogle Scholar
  11. Lipa B, Parikh H, Barrick D, Roarty H, Glenn S (2013) High frequency radar observations of the June 2013 US East Coast meteotsunami. Nat Hazards, doi  10.1007/s11069-013-0992-4
  12. Monserrat S, Vilibić I, Rabinovich AB (2006) Meteotsunamis: atmospherically induced destructive waves in the tsunami frequency band. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:1035–1051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nichols B, Hirt C, Hotchkiss RS (1980) SOLA-VOF: a solution algorithm for transient fluid flow with multiple free boundaries. Los Alamos National Labs report LA-8355Google Scholar
  14. Pasquet S, Vilibić I (2013) Shelf edge reflection of atmospherically generated long ocean waves along the central U.S. East Coast. Cont Shelf Res 66:1–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Pasquet S, Vilibić I, Šepić J (2013) A survey of strong high-frequency sea level oscillations along the US East Coast between 2006 and 2011. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 13. doi: 10.5194/nhess-13-473-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Renault LG, Vizoso A, Jansa A, Wilkin J, Tintore J (2011) Toward the predictability of meteotsunamis in the Balearic Sea using regional nested atmosphere and ocean models. Geophys Res Lett 38:L10601. doi: 10.1029/2011GL047361 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Šepić J, Vilibić I (2011) The development and implementation of a real-time meteotsunami warning network for the Adriatic Sea. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:83–91. doi:10.5194nhess-11-83-2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Šepić J, Vilibić I, Mahović NS (2012) Northern Adriatic meteorological tsunamis: observations, link to the atmosphere, and predictability. J Geophys Res 117:C02002. doi: 10.1029/2011JC007608 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Tanaka K (2012) On meteotsunamis around Tsushima Strait generated by the Baiu front. Nat Hazards 63:805–822. doi: 10.1007/s11069-012-0186-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tatehata H (1997) The new tsunami warning system of the Japan Meteorological Agency. In: Hebenstreit G (ed) Perspectives on tsunami hazard reduction. Springer, New York, pp 175–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Thomson RE, Rabinovich AB, Fine IV, Sinnott DC, McCarthy A, Sutherland NAS, Neil LK (2009) Meteological tsunamis on the coasts of British Columbia and Washington. Phys Chem Earth 34:971–988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Titov VV, Gonzalez FI, Bernard EN, Eble MC, Mofjeld HO, Newman JC, Venturato AJ (2005) Real-time tsunami forecasting: challenges and solutions. Nat Hazards 35:41–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Van Leer B (1977) Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme-IV. J Comput Phys 23:276–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vilibić I, Šepić J (2009) Destructive meteotsunamis along the eastern Adriatic coast: overview. Phys Chem Earth 34:904–917CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Vilibić I, Horvath K, Mahović NS, Monserrat S, Marcos M, Amores A, Fine I (2013) Atmospheric processes responsible for the generation of the 2008 Boothbay meteotsunami. Nat Hazards. doi  10.1007/s11069-013-0811-y
  26. Wang D, Becker NC, Walsh D, Fryer GJ, Weinstein SA, McCreery CS, Sardina V, Hsu V, Hirshorn BF, Hayes GP, Duputel Z, Rivera L, Kanamori H, Koyanagi KK, Shiro B (2012) Real-time forecasting of the April 11, 2012 Sumatra tsunami. Geophys Res Lett 39:6 pp. doi:  10.1029/2012GL053081 Google Scholar
  27. Whitmore P (2003) Tsunami amplitude prediction during events: a test based on previous tsunamis. Sci Tsunami Hazards 21:135–143Google Scholar
  28. Whitmore P (2009) Tsunami warning systems. Chapter 13. In: Bernard EN, Robinson AR (eds) The sea—tsunamis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA, pp 401–442Google Scholar
  29. Wilson RI, Admire AR, Borrero JC, Dengler LA, Legg MR, Lynett P, Miller KM, Ritchie A, Sterling K, McCrink TP, Whitmore PM (2012) Observations and impacts from the 2010 Chilean and 2011 Japanese tsunami in California (USA). Pure Appl Geophys. doi: 10.1007/s00024-012-0527-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© US Government 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.NOAA/NWS National Tsunami Warning CenterPalmerUSA

Personalised recommendations