Advertisement

Social Competition and Bullying: An Adaptive Socioecological Perspective

Chapter
Part of the Evolutionary Psychology book series (EVOLPSYCH)

Abstract

Bullying directly and negatively impacts millions of people across the globe each year. Bullying has traditionally been studied from perspectives other than social psychology, even though bullying is an inherently social behavior. We therefore suggest studying bullying using an adaptive ecological framework that highlights how individual and social factors interact to promote or influence bullying, particularly under conditions of high competition. Drawing inspiration from Bronfenbrenner’s (The ecology of human development: experiments by nature and design, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 2009) socioecological theory, we examine individual facts as well as an expanding ring of social factors from the immediate environment, to the neighborhood, to the broader culture, to determine how and when bullying is influenced by various social factors, and how individuals respond adaptively to these social factors. We include data on animal bullying and social factors, as well as final conclusions and recommendations for future research.

Keywords

Bullying Socioecological theory Ecology Evolution Culture Competition 

References

  1. Alcock, J. A. (1989). Animal behavior (4th Ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates.Google Scholar
  2. Allan, E., & Madden, M. (2008). Hazing in view: College students at risk, initial findings from the national study on student hazing. http://www.hazingstudy.org. Accessed 6 Dec 2013.
  3. Archer, J. (2004). Sex differences in aggression in real-world settings: A meta-analytic review. Review of General Psychology, 8, 291–322. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.8.4.291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asch, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 70, 1–70. doi: 10.1037/h0093718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ashton, M., & Lee, K. (2001). A theoretical basis for the dimensions of personality. European Journal of Personality, 15, 327–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 150–166.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Ball, H. A., Arseneault, L., Taylor, A., Maughan, B., Caspi, A., & Moffitt, T. E. (2008). Genetic and environmental influences on victims, bullies and bully-victims in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 104–112. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01821.x.Google Scholar
  8. Bandura, A. (1978). Social learning theory of aggression. Journal of Communication, 28, 12–29. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1978.tb01621.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Barber, N. (2008). Evolutionary social science: A new approach to violent crime. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 13, 237–250. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2008.04.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barboza, G., Schiamberg, L. B., Oehmke, J., Korzeniewski, S. J., Post, L. A., & Heraux, C. G. (2009). Individual characteristics and the multiple contexts of adolescent bullying: An ecological perspective. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 38, 101–121. doi:10.1007/s10964-008-9271-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Bazelon, E. (2013). Sticks and stones. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  12. Bell, M. B., Nichols, H. J., Gilchrist, J. S., Cant, M. A., & Hodges, S. J. (2012). The cost of dominance: Suppressing subordinate reproduction affects the reproductive success of dominant female banded mongooses. Proceedings of the Royal Society ( B), 270, 619–624. doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1093.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berger, K. S. (2007). Update on bullying at school: Science forgotten? Developmental Review, 27, 90–126. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2006.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bollmer, J. M., Harris, M. J., & Milich, R. (2006). Reactions to bullying and peer victimization: Narratives, physiological arousal, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 803–828. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2005.09.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Book, A., Volk, A. A., & Hosker, A. (2012). Adolescent bullying and personality: An adaptive approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 218–223. doi:10.1016/j.paid. 2011.10.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brady, J. E., Newcomb, A. F., & Hartup, W. W. (1983). Context and companion’s behavior as determinants of cooperation and competition in school-age children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 36, 396–412. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(83)90042-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bronfenbrenner, U. (2009). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Butler, R., & Kedar, A. (1990). Effects of intergroup competition and school philosophy on student perceptions, group processes, and performance. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15, 301–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2009). Unique and interactive effects of empathy and social status on involvement in bullying. Social Development, 18, 140–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Caravita, S. C. S., Di Blasio, P., & Salmivalli, C. (2010). Early adolescents’ participation in bullying: Is ToM involved? Journal of Early Adolescence, 30, 138–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cimino, A. (2011). The evolution of hazing: Motivational mechanisms and the abuse of newcomers. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 11, 241–267. doi:10.1163/156853711X591242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Connolly, I., & O’Moore, M. (2003). Personality and family relations of children who bully. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 559–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Connolly, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W., & Taradesh, A. (2000). Dating experiences of bullies in early adolescence. Child Maltreatment, 5, 299–310.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Creel, S., & Creel, N. M. (2002). The African wild dog. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Crow, B. R., & Macintosh, E. W. (2009). Conceptualizing a meaningful definition of hazing in sport. European Sports Management Quarterly, 9, 433–451. doi:10.1080/16184740903331937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Crow, R. B., & Rosner, S. R. (2002). Institutional and organizational liability for hazing in intercollegiate and professional team sports. St. John’s Law Review, 76, 87–114.Google Scholar
  27. Cunningham, H. (2005). Children and childhood in western society since 1500 (2nd ed.). Toronto: Pearson-Longman Press.Google Scholar
  28. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (1988). Homicide. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Daly, M., & Wilson, M. (2010). Cultural inertia, economic incentives, and the persistence of ‘southern violence’. In M. Schaller, A. Norenzayan, S. J. Heine, T. Yamagishi, T. Kameda (Eds.), Evolution, culture and the human mind (pp. 229–241). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  30. Darley, J. M., & Latané, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8, 377–383.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Due, P., Merlo, J., Harel-Fisch, Y., Damsgaard, M., Holstein, B. E., Hetland, J., Currie, C., Gabhainn, S. N., Des Matos, M. G., & Lynch, J. (2009). Socioeconomic inequality in exposure to bullying during adolescence: A comparative, cross-sectional, multilevel study in 35 countries. American Journal of Public Health, 99, 907–912.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Einarsen, S., Hoel, H., Zapf, D., & Cooper, C. (Eds.), (2010). Bullying and harassment in the workplace: Developments in theory, research, and practice. Boca Raton: Taylor-Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Elgar, F., Craig, W., Boyce, W., Morgan, A., & Vella-Zarb, R. (2009). Income inequality and school bullying: Multilevel study of adolescents in 37 countries. Journal of Adolescent Health, 45, 351–359. doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2009.05.004.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Elgar, F. J., Pickett, K. E., Pickett, W., Craig, W., Molcho, M., Hurrelmann, K., & Leniz, M. (2013). School bullying, homicide and income inequality: A cross-national pooled time series analysis. International Journal of Public Health, 58, 237–245. doi:10.1007/s00038-012-0380-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Ellis, L. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 257–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ellis, B. J., Del Giudice, M., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicious, V., Hawley, P. H., Jacobs, J., James, J., Volk, A. A., & Wilson, D. S. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48, 598–623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1975). Manual of the eysenck personality questionnaire. London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
  38. Farrell, A. H., Della Cioppa, V., Volk, A. A., & Book, A. S. (in press). Predicting bullying heterogeneity with the HEXACO model of personality. International Journal of Advances in Psychology.Google Scholar
  39. Fields, S. K., Collins, C. L., & Comstock, R. D. (2010). Violence in youth sports: Hazing, brawling and foul play. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 44, 32–37. doi:10.1136/bjsm.2009.068320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Flanagan, R. (2007). Lucifer goes to law school: Towards explaining and minimizing law student peer-to-peer harassment and intimidation. Washburn Law Journal, 47, 453–469.Google Scholar
  41. Garandeau, C. F., Lee, I. A., & Salmivalli, C. (2013). Differential effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on popular and unpopular bullies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2013.10.004.Google Scholar
  42. Golden, M. (1990). Children and childhood in classical Athens. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Goodall, J. (1986). The chimpanzees of Gombe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Hawley, P. H. (1999). The ontogenesis of social dominance: A strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, 97–132. doi:10.1006/drev.1998.0470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Holman, M. (2004). A search for a theoretical understanding of hazing practices in athletics. In J. Johnson & M. Holman (Eds.), Making the team: Inside the world of sports initiations and hazing (pp. 50–60). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.Google Scholar
  46. Hong, J. S., & Espelage, D. L. (2012). A review of research on bullying and peer victimization in school: An ecological system analysis. Aggression and Violent Behaviour, 17, 311–322. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2012.03.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hrdy, S. B. (1999). Mother nature: A history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. Toronto: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  48. Hrdy, S. B. (2009). Mothers and others: The evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Ireland, J. L. (2005). Psychological health and bullying behavior among adolescent prisoners: A study of young and juvenile offenders. Journal of Adolescent, 36, 236–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  51. Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  52. Jankauskiene, R., Kardelis, K., Sukys, S., & Kardeliene, L. (2008) Associations between school bullying and psychosocial factors. Social Behaviour & Personality: An International Journal, 36, 145–161. doi:10.2224/sbp.2008.36.2.145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Johnson, J. (2011). Through the liminal: A comparative analysis of communitas and rites of passage in sports hazing and initiations. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 36, 199–226.Google Scholar
  54. Jonsson, P. (2013, November 8). Muscle and meanness: Incognito hazing comes down to ‘What’s a real man?’ The Christian Science Monitor. http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Sports/2013/1108/Muscle-and-meanness-Incognito-hazing-comes-down-to-What-s-a-real-man.
  55. Juvonen, J., Graham, S., & Schuster, M. A. (2003). Bullying among young adolescents: The strong, the weak, and the troubled. Pediatrics, 112, 1231–1237.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Keating, C. F., Pomerantz, J., Pommer, D., Ritt, S. J. H., Miller, L. M., & McCormick, J. (2005). Going to college and unpacking hazing: A functional approach to decrypting initiation practices among undergraduates. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 9, 104–126. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.9.2.104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Keegan, R., Spray, C., Harwood, C., & Lavallee, D. (2009). The motivational atmosphere in youth sport: Coach, parent and peer influences on motivation in specializing sport participants. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 22, 87–105. doi:10.1080/10413200903421267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kiyonari, T., & Barkclay, P. (2008). Cooperation in social dilemmas: Free riding may be thwarted by second-order reward rather than by punishment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 826–842. doi:10.1037/a0011381.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Kolbert, J. B., & Crothers, L. M. (2003). Bullying and evolutionary psychology. Journal of School Violence, 2, 73–91. doi:10.1300/J202v02n03_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Koth, C. W., Bradshaw, C. P., & Leaf, P. J. (2008). A multilevel study of predictors of student perceptions of school climare: The effect of classroom-level factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 96–104. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.100.1.96.Google Scholar
  61. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2005). Psychopathy, Machiavellianism, and Narcissism in the Five Factor Model and the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1571–1582. doi:10.1016/paid.2004.09.016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Leenaars, L. S., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2008). Evolutionary perspective on indirect victimization in adolescence: The role of attractiveness, dating and sexual behaviour. Aggressive Behavior, 34, 404–415. doi:10.1002/ab.20252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Malszecki, G. (2004). “No mercy shown nor asked”- toughness test or torture? Hazing in military combat units and its “collateral damage”. In J. Johnson & M. Holman (Eds.), Making the team: Inside the world of sports initiations and hazing (pp. 32–49). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press Inc.Google Scholar
  64. Mech, D. L. (1970). The wolf: The ecology and behavior of an endangered species. Garden City: Natural History Press.Google Scholar
  65. Menesini, E., Camodeca, M., & Nocentini, A. (2010). Bullying among siblings: The role of personality and relational variables. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 28, 921–939. doi:10.1348/026151009X479402.Google Scholar
  66. Menzer, M., & Torney-Purta, J. (2012). Individualism and socioeconomic diversity at school as related to perceptions of the frequency of peer aggression in fifteen countries. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 1285–1294. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.04.013.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Merrell, K. W., Gueldner, B. A., Ross, S. W., & Isava, D. M. (2008). How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. School Psychology, 23, 26–42. doi:10.1037/1045-3830.23.1.26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Merten, D. E. (1997). The meaning of meanness: Popularity, competition and conflict among junior high school girls. Sociology of Education, 70, 175–191. doi:10.2307/2673207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Milgram, S. (2004). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  70. Myers, D. G., Spencer, S. J., & Jordan, C. (2009). Social psychology (4th ed.). Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.Google Scholar
  71. Mynard, H., & Joseph, S. (1997). Bully/victim problems and their associations with Eysenck’s personality dimensions in 8 to 13 year-olds. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67, 51–54. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01226.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Pellegrini, A. D., Roseth, C. J., Milner, S., Bohn, C. M., Van Ryzin, M., Vance, N., Cheatham, C. L., & Tarullo, A. (2007). Social dominance in preschool classrooms. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 121, 54–64. doi:10.1037/0735-7036.121.1.54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature: Why violence has declined. Toronto: Penguin.Google Scholar
  74. Post, D. G., Hausfater, G., & McCuskey, S. A. (1980). Feeding behavior of yellow baboons (Papio cynocephalus): Relationship to age, gender and dominance rank. Folia Primatologica, 34, 170–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rees, R. C. (2010). Bullying and hazing/initiation in schools: How sports and physical education can be part of the problem and part of the solution. Journal of Physical Education, 43, 24–27.Google Scholar
  76. Reijntjes, A., Vermande, M., Olthof, T., Goosens, F. A., van de Schoot, R., Aleva, L., & van der Meulen, M. (2013). Costs and benefits of bullying in the context of peer group: A three wave longitudinal analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 41, 1217–1229. doi:10.1007/s10802-013-9759-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Rodkin, P. C., & Hodges, E. V. E. (2003). Bullies and victims in the peer ecology: Four questions for psychologist and school professionals. School Psychology Review, 32, 384–400.Google Scholar
  78. Roland, E. (2011). The broken curve: Effects of the Norwegian manifesto against bullying. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 35, 383–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Roseth, C. J., Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2008). Promoting early adolescents’ achievement and peer relationships: The effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures. Psychology Bulletin, 134, 223–246. doi:10.1037/0033 2909.134.2.223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Salmivalli, C. (2010). Bullying and the peer group: A review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 15, 112–120. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2009.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Scheel, D., & Packer, C. (1991). Group hunting behaviour of lions: A search for cooperation. Animal Behaviour, 41, 697–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Scott, J. (1991). Painted wolves. Toronto: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  83. Shannon, C. S. (2013). Bullying in recreation and sport setting: Exploring risk factors, prevention efforts, and intervention strategies. Journal of Parks and Recreation Administration, 31, 15–33.Google Scholar
  84. Shetgiri, R., Lin, H., Avila, R. M., & Flores, G. (2012). Parental characteristics associated with bullying perpetration in US children aged 10 to 17 years. American Journal of Public Health, 102, 2280–2286. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2012.300725.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Shute, R., Owens, L., & Slee, P. (2008). Everyday victimization of adolescent girls by boys: Sexual harassment, bullying, or aggression? Sex Roles, 58, 447–489. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9363-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Slee, P. T., & Rigby, K. (1993). The relationship of Eysenck’s personality factors and self- esteem to bully/victim behaviour in Australian school boys. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 371–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Stewart, K. J. (1987). Spotted hyenas: The importance of being dominant. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 2, 88–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Sutton, J., & Keogh, E. (2000). Social competition in school: Relationships with bullying, Machiavellianism, and personality. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 70, 443–456. doi:10.1348/000709900158227.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Tani, F., Greenman, P. S., Schneider, B. H., & Fregoso, M. (2003). Bullying and the Big Five: A study of childhood personality and participant roles in bullying incidents. School Psychology International, 24, 131–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Townsend, S. W., Slocombe, K. E., Emery Thompson, M., & Zuberbühler, K. (2007). Female-led infanticide in wild chimpanzees. Current Biology, 17, R355–R356. doi:0.1016/j.cub.2007.03.020.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Ttofi, M. M., & Farrington, D. P. (2011). Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: A systematic and meta-analytic approach. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 7, 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Vaillancourt, T., Hymel, S, & McDougall, P. (2003). Bullying Is power: Implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, 157–176. doi:10.1300/J008v19n02_10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Van Raalte, J. L., Cornelius, A. E., Linder, D. E., & Brewer, B. W. (2007). The relationship between hazing and team cohesion. Journal of Sports Behavior, 30, 491–504.Google Scholar
  94. Veenstra, R., Lindenberg, S., Munniksma, A., & Dijkstra, J. K. (2010). The complex relation between bullying, victimization, acceptance, and rejection: Giving special attention to status, affection, and sex differences. Child Development, 81, 480–486.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Veselka, L., Schermer, J. A., Martin, R. A., Cherkas, L. F., Spector, T. D., & Vernon, P. A. (2010). A behavioral genetic study of relationships between humor styles and the six HEXACO personality factors. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 6, 9–33.Google Scholar
  96. Volk, A. A., & Lagzdins, L. (2009). Bullying and victimization among adolescent girl athletes. Athletic Insight, 11, 15–33.Google Scholar
  97. Volk, A. A., Craig, W., Boyce, W., & King, M. (2006). Adolescent risk correlates of bullying and different types of victimization. International Journal of Adolescent Medicine and Health, 21, 575–588. doi:10.1515/IJAMH.2006.18.4.575.Google Scholar
  98. Volk, A., Camilleri, J., Dane, A., & Marini, Z. (2012a). If, when, and why bullying is adaptive. In T. Shackelford & V. Shackelford (Eds.), Oxford handbook of evolutionary perspectives on violence, homicide, and war (pp. 270–288). Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Volk, A. A., Camilleri, J. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2012b). Is adolescent bullying an evolutionary adaptation? Aggressive Behaviour, 38, 222–238. doi:10.1002/ab.21418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., Marini, Z. A., & Vaillancourt, T. (Submitted). Adolescent bullying, dating, and mating: An evolutionary hypothesis. Evolution and Human Behavior.Google Scholar
  101. Waldron, J., & Kowalski, C. (2010). Looking the other way: Athletes’ perceptions of coaches’ responses to hazing. International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching, 5, 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Warren, K., Schoppelrey, S., Moberg, D. P., & McDonald, M. (2005). A model of contagion through competition in the aggressive behavior of elementary school students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 283–292. doi:10.1007/s10802-005-3565-5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Wilkinson, R. (2004). Why is violence more common where inequality is greater? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1036, 1–12. doi:10.1196/annals.1330.001.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. Wolke, D., Woods, S., Bloomfield, L., & Karstadt, L. (2001). Bullying involvement in primary school and common health problems. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 85, 197–201.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Child and Youth StudiesBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada

Personalised recommendations