Advertisement

An Assessment of the Negative and Positive Aspects of Stereotypes and the Derogatory and Nonderogatory Uses of Slurs

  • Adam M. CroomEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology book series (PEPRPHPS, volume 4)

Abstract

In a recent study on indirect reports published in Journal of Pragmatics, Capone (2010) points out how several leading pragmatic theorists have recently argued that utterance interpretation incorporates societal information such that the final result of semantic and pragmatic interpretation takes sociocultural defaults into account (e.g., Jaszczolt, 2005a). Croom (2013) for one has pointed out how different in-group and out-group speakers have in fact used slurs in different ways, and further suggests that several salient cultural markers can aid in the interpretation of whether a slur is being used derogatorily or nonderogatorily in a given context (p. 200). Thus, for pragmatic theorists concerned with the semantics and pragmatics of slurs more specifically, several highly important yet currently unexplored questions include the following: Are racial slurs always used to express offense, and are racial stereotypes always concerned with negative characteristics? How might the stereotypical features of members that a slur typically targets influence the meaning that slur communicates in context, and how might racial slurs and stereotypes differentially affect members of different races? Concerned with such questions, Embrick and Henricks (2013) recently argued that racial slurs and stereotypes function as symbolic resources that exclude nonwhite or non-European American minorities, but not whites or European Americans, from opportunities or resources, and so are necessarily negative or derogatory irrespective of the particular context of their use (pp. 197–202). They accordingly advocate an account of racial slurs and stereotypes that is consonant with the context-insensitive accounts of Fitten (1993) and Hedger (2013), yet dissonant with the context-sensitive accounts of Kennedy (2002) and Croom (2011). The purpose of this chapter is to first briefly explicate the context-insensitive and context-sensitive accounts of racial slurs and stereotypes, consider reasons for why issues concerning the semantics and pragmatics of slurs have often appealed to stereotypes and stereotypical features, and then critically evaluate the main claims that Embrick and Henricks (2013) recently proposed in support of their context-insensitive account by drawing upon empirical evidence on (in-group and out-group uses of) racial slurs and stereotypes (for European Americans and ­African Americans) from recent research in linguistics, sociology, and psychology. The chapter concludes by discussing implications of the present findings for future work in pragmatics on racial slurs and stereotypes.

Keywords

Slurs Stereotypes Semantics Pragmatics Reappropriation Philosophy of language 

References

  1. Alim, H. S. 2002. Street-conscious copula variation in the hip hop nation. American Speech 77:288–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-77-3-288.Google Scholar
  2. Alim, H. S. 2003a. On some serious next millennium rap ishhh: Pharoahe Monch, hip hop poetics, and the internal rhymes of internal affairs. Journal of English Linguistics 31:60–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0075424202250619.Google Scholar
  3. Alim, H. S. 2003b. “We are the streets”: African American language and the strategic construction of a street conscious identity. In Black linguistics: Language, society, and the politics in Africa and the Americas, eds. S. Makoni, G. Smitherman, A. F. Ball, and A. K. Spears, 40–59. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Alim, H. S. 2004. You know my Steez: An ethnographic and sociolinguistic study of styleshifting in a Black American Speech Community. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Alim, H. S. 2005a. Critical language awareness in the United States: Revisiting issues and revising pedagogies in a resegregated society. Educational Researcher 34:24–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X034007024.Google Scholar
  6. Alim, H. S. 2005b. Hearing what’s not said and missing what is: Black language in white public space. In Intercultural discourse and communication: The essential readings, eds. S. F. Kiesling and C. B. Paulston, 180–197. New York: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Alim, H. S. 2006. Roc the Mic right: The language of hip hop culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Alim, H. S. 2009a. Translocal style communities: Hip hop youth as cultural theorists of style, language, and globalization. Pragmatics 19:103–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Alim, H. S. 2009b. Hip hop nation language. In Linguistic anthropology: A reader, ed. A. Duranti, 272–290. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Alim, H. S. 2009c. Straight outta Compton, straight aus Munchen: Global linguistic flows, identities, and the politics of language in a global hip hop nation. In Global linguistic flows: Hip hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language, eds. H. S. Alim, A. Ibrahim, and A. Pennycook, 1–24. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Alim, H. S., and J. Baugh. 2006. Talkin black talk: Language, education, and social change. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  12. Alim, H. S., A. Ibrahim, and A. Pennycook. 2009. Global linguistic flows: Hip hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Alim, H. S., J. Lee, and L. Carris. 2010. “Short fried-rice-eating Chinese MCs” and “good hair-havin uncle Tom niggas”: Performing race and ethnicity in freestyle rap battles. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 20:116–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1548-1395.2010.01052.x.Google Scholar
  14. Anderson, E. 1999. Code of the street: Decency, violence, and the moral life of the inner city. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  15. Anderson, L., and E. Lepore. 2013a. Slurring words. Nous 47:25–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00820.x.
  16. Anderson, L., and E. Lepore. 2013b. What did you call me? Slurs as prohibited words. Analytic Philosophy 54:350–363. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phib.12023.Google Scholar
  17. Asim, J. 2007. The N Word. New York: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  18. Bartlett, J., J. Reffin, N. Rumball, and S. Williamson. 2014. Anti-social media. Demos 1–51. http://apo.org.au/node/37598.
  19. Baugh, J. 1983. Black street speech: Its history, structure, and survival. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  20. Block, C., K. Aumann, and A. Chelin. 2012. Assessing stereotypes of black and white managers: A diagnostic ratio approach. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 42:E128–E149. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.01014.x.Google Scholar
  21. Boyd, T. 2002. The new H.N.I.C. (Head Niggas in Charge): The death of civil rights and the reign of hip hop. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Brontsema, R. 2004. A queer revolution: Reconceptualizing the debate over linguistic reclamation. Colorado Research in Linguistics 17:1–17. http://www.colorado.edu/ling/CRIL/Volume17_Issue1/paper_BRONTSEMA.pdf.
  23. Brown, P., and Levinson, S. 1978. Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction, ed. E. Goody, 56–289. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Bucholtz, M. 1999. You da man: Narrating the racial other in the production of white masculinity. Journal of Sociolinguistics 3:443–460. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00090.Google Scholar
  25. Bucholtz, M. 2001. The whiteness of nerds: Superstandard English and racial markedness. Linguistic Anthropology 11:84–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2001.11.1.84.Google Scholar
  26. Bucholtz, M. 2011a. Race and the re-embodied voice in Hollywood. Language and Communication 31:255–265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.02.004.
  27. Bucholtz, M. 2011b. White kids: Language, race, and styles of youth identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Bucholtz, M., and Q. Lopez. 2011. Performing blackness, forming whiteness: Linguistic minstrelsy in Hollywood film. Journal of Sociolinguistics 15:680–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2011.00513.x.Google Scholar
  29. Camp, E. 2013. Slurring perspectives. Analytic Philosophy 54:330–349. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phib.12020.Google Scholar
  30. Capone, A. 2010. On the social practice of indirect reports (further advances in the theory of pragmemes). Journal of Pragmatics 42:377–391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2009.06.013.Google Scholar
  31. Capone, A. 2012. Indirect reports as language games. Pragmatics and Cognition 20:593–613. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/pc.20.3.07cap.Google Scholar
  32. Capone, A. 2013. The pragmatics of indirect reports and slurring. In Perspectives on linguistic pragmatics, eds. A. Capone, F. Lo Piparo, and M. Carapezza, 153–183. Cham: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01014-4_6.Google Scholar
  33. Cass, C., and J. Agiesta. 2011. Poll: Young people see online slurs as just joking. MSNBC, September 20. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44591677/ns/technology_and_science-tech_and_gadgets/t/poll-young-people-see-online-slurs-justjoking/.
  34. Croom, A. M. 2008. Racial epithets: What we say and mean by them. Dialogue 51:34–45. http://semanticsarchive.net/Archive/ThiMjU0N/Racial%20epithets%20What%20we%20say%20and%20mean%20by%20them%20-%20Croom%202008.pdf.
  35. Croom, A. M. 2010. A game theoretical analysis of slurs and appropriative use. Fourth North American Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information, June 26. Indiana University. http://www.indiana.edu/~nasslli/NASSLLIwebprogram.pdf.
  36. Croom, A. M. 2011. Slurs. Language Sciences 33:343–358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2010.11.005.Google Scholar
  37. Croom, A. M. 2012. Face, race, and the psychology of slurring in a cultural context. University of Pennsylvania Program on Democracy, Citizenship, and Constitutionalism Annual Conference, 27 April. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  38. Croom, A. M. 2013a. How to do things with slurs: Studies in the way of derogatory words. Language and Communication 33:177–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.03.008.Google Scholar
  39. Croom, A. M. 2013b. Racial epithets, characterizations, and slurs. Analysis and Metaphysics 12:11–24. http://www.addletonacademicpublishers.com/contents-am/217-volume-12-2013/1967-racial-epithets-characterizations-and-slurs.
  40. Croom, A. M. 2014a. The semantics of slurs: A refutation of pure expressivism. Language Sciences 41:227–242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2013.07.003.Google Scholar
  41. Croom, A. M. 2014b. Remarks on “The semantics of racial slurs”. Linguistic and Philosophical Investigations 13:11–32. http://addletonacademicpublishers.com/images/Adam_M._Croom-Remarks_on_the_Semantics_of_Racial_Slurs%20.pdf.
  42. Croom, A. M. 2014c. Slurs, stereotypes, and in-equality: A critical review of “How Epithets and Stereotypes are Racially Unequal”. Language Sciences. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2014.03.001. Accessed 1 July 2014.
  43. Cutler, C. 2003. “Keepin’ it real”: White hip-hoppers’ discourses of language, race, and authenticity. Linguistic Anthropology 13:211–233. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/jlin.2003.13.2.211.Google Scholar
  44. Cutler, C. 2007. The co-construction of whiteness in an MC battle. Pragmatics 17:9–22. http://elanguage.net/journals/pragmatics/article/view/544/468.Google Scholar
  45. Cutler, C. 2009. “You shouldn’t be rappin,” you should be skateboardin’ the X-Games: The construction of Whiteness in an MC Battle. In Global linguistic flows: Hip hop cultures, youth identities, and the politics of language, eds. H. Alim, A. Ibrahim, and A. Pennycook, 195–212. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Czopp, A., and M. Monteith. 2006. Thinking well of African Americans: Measuring complimentary stereotypes and negative prejudice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 28:233–250. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2803_3.Google Scholar
  47. Denzin, N. K. 2001. Symbolic interactionism, poststructuralism, and the racial subject. Symbolic Interaction 24:243–249. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.2001.24.2.243.Google Scholar
  48. Echegoyen, H. 2006. The N Word: Divided We Stand. Post Consumer Media.Google Scholar
  49. Embrick, D. G., and K. Henricks. 2013. Discursive colorlines at work: How epithets and stereotypes are racially unequal. Symbolic Interaction 36:197–215. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/symb.51.Google Scholar
  50. Fitten, R. K. 1993. Fighting words: No matter who uses them, racial slurs ultimately serve to denigrate and divide. The Seattle Times, March 19. http://community.seattletimes.nwsource.com/archive/?date=19930319&slug=1691293.
  51. Fitzmaurice, S. 2010. Changes in the meanings of politeness in eighteenth-century England: Discourse analysis and historical evidence. In Historical (Im)politeness, eds. J. Culpeper and D. Kadar, 87–115. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  52. Foreman, T. 2013. ‘Cracker’ conveys history of bigotry that still resonates. CNN, July 2. http://www.cnn.com/2013/07/01/us/zimmerman-trial-cracker.
  53. Foster, T. 2013. For two Lions, racial slurs are friendly banter. The Detroit News, August 8. http://www.detroitnews.com/article/20130808/SPORTS0101/308080035.
  54. Fredrickson, G. 1971. The black image in the white mind. Middletown: Wesleyan University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Galinsky, A. D., K. Hugenberg, C. Groom, and G. Bodenhausen. 2003. The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: Implications for social identity. In Identity issues in groups, eds. J. Polzer, M. Neale, and E. Mannix, 221–256. Greenwich: Elsevier Science.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Galinsky, A., C. Wang, J. Whitson, E. Anicich, K. Hugenberg, and G. Bodenhausen. 2013. The reappropriation of stigmatizing labels: The reciprocal relationship between power and self-labeling. Psychological Science 24:2020–2029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797613482943.Google Scholar
  57. Gates, H. 2009. 10 Questions. Time, February 16, 9.Google Scholar
  58. Goffman, E. 1967. Interaction ritual: Essays on face-to-face behavior. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  59. Greene, R. 2011. Slurs: Are the kids all right? The Economist, September 20. http://www.economist.com/blogs/johnson/2011/09/slurs.
  60. Haley, H., and J. Sidanius. 2006. The positive and negative framing of affirmative action: A group dominance perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 32:656–668. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167205283442.Google Scholar
  61. Hedger, J. 2013. Meaning and racial slurs: Derogatory epithets and the semantics/pragmatics interface. Language and Communication 33:205–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.04.004.Google Scholar
  62. Heffernan, V. 2005. Epithet morphs from bad girl to weak boy. New York Times, March 22. http://www.nytimes.com/2005/03/22/arts/television/22chie.html.
  63. Hom, C. 2008. The semantics of racial epithets. Journal of Philosophy 105:416–440.Google Scholar
  64. Hom, C. 2010. Pejoratives. Philosophy Compass 5:164–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2009.00274.x.Google Scholar
  65. Hom, C. 2012. A puzzle about pejoratives. Philosophical Studies 159:383–405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11098-011-9749-7.Google Scholar
  66. Hooks, B. 1992. Black looks: Race and representation. Boston: South End Press.Google Scholar
  67. Hughey, M. 2012. Stigma allure and white antiracist identity management. Social Psychology Quarterly 75:219–241. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0190272512446756.Google Scholar
  68. Jackson, D. 2005. Epithet stung, even for Pryor. The Boston Globe, December 14. http://www.boston.com/news/globe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2005/12/14/epithet_stung_even_for_pryor/.
  69. Jaszczolt, K. M. 1997. The ‘default de re’ principle for the interpretation of belief utterances. Journal of Pragmatics 28:315–336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(97)00006-4.Google Scholar
  70. Jaszczolt, K. M. 2005a. Default semantics: Foundations of a compositional theory of acts of communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Jaszczolt, K. M. 2005b. Prolegomena to default semantics. In Reviewing linguistic thought: Converging trends for the 21st century, eds. S. Marmaridou, K. Nikiforidou, and E. Antonopoulou, 107–142. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  72. Jaszczolt, K. M. 2010a. Defaults in semantics and pragmatics. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://stanford.library.usyd.edu.au/entries/defaults-semantics-pragmatics/. Accessed 1 July 2014.
  73. Jaszczolt, K. M. 2010b. Default semantics. In The Oxford handbook of linguistic analysis, eds. B. Heine and H. Narrog, 193–221. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Jaszczolt, K. M., and K. Allan. eds. 2011. Salience and Defaults in Utterance Processing. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  75. Jeshion, R. 2013. Slurs and stereotypes. Analytic Philosophy 54:314–329. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/phib.12021.Google Scholar
  76. Kaplan, D. 1999. The meaning of Ouch and Oops: Explorations in the Theory of Meaning As Use. Los Angeles: University of California (unpublished ms).Google Scholar
  77. Kennedy, R. 2002. Nigger: The strange career of a troublesome word. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  78. Kratzer, A., 1999. Beyond ouch and oops: How descriptive and expressive meaning interact. Cornell Conference on Theories of Context Dependence.Google Scholar
  79. Lee, J. 2009a. “Battlin’ on the corner” Techniques for sustaining play. Social Problems 56:578–598. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1525/sp.2009.56.3.578.Google Scholar
  80. Lee, J. 2009b. Escaping embarrassment: Face-work in the rap cipher. Social Psychology Quarterly 72:306–324. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019027250907200405.Google Scholar
  81. MacDonald, M. 2000. All souls: A Family Story from Southie. New York: Ballentine.Google Scholar
  82. Marx, D. M., and D. Stapel. 2006. Distinguishing stereotype threat from priming effects: The role of the social self and threat-based concerns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91:243–254. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.243.Google Scholar
  83. Miron, L. F., and J. X. Inda. 2000. Race as a kind of speech act. Cultural Studies: A Research Annual 5:85–107.Google Scholar
  84. Murphy, M. C., C. M. Steele, and J. J. Gross. 2007. Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science 18:879–885. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x.Google Scholar
  85. Norton, M., and S. Sommers. 2011. Whites see racism as a zero-sum game that they are now losing. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6:215–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691611406922.
  86. Pfeil, F. 1995. White guys: Studies in postmodern domination and difference. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  87. Pinker, S., and A. Prince. 1996. The nature of human concepts/evidence from an unusual source. Communication and Cognition 29:307–362.Google Scholar
  88. Potts, C. 2003. Expressive content as conventional implicature. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistics Society. vol. 33, eds. M. Kadowaki and S. Kawahara, 303–322. Amherst: GLSA.Google Scholar
  89. Potts, C. 2005. The logic of conventional implicature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Potts, C. 2007. The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33:165–197. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/TL.2007.011.
  91. Potts, C., and S. Kawahara. 2004. Japanese honorifics as emotive definite descriptions. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory 14:235–254. http://elanguage.net/journals/salt/article/view/14.253/1745.Google Scholar
  92. Potts, C., A. Asudeh, S. Cable, Y. Hara, E. McCready, L. Alonso-Ovalle, R. Bhatt, C. Davis, A. Kratzer, T. Roeper, and M. Walkow. 2009. Expressives and identity conditions. Linguistic Inquiry 40:356–366. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/ling.2009.40.2.356.Google Scholar
  93. Pullum, G., and K. Rawlins. 2007. Argument or no argument? Linguistics and Philosophy 30:277–287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10988-007-9013-y.Google Scholar
  94. Rahman, J. 2004. It's a serious business: The linguistic construction of middle class white characters by African American narrative comedians. PhD Diss. Stanford University, Stanford.Google Scholar
  95. Rahman, J. 2007. An ay for an ah: Language of survival in African American narrative comedy. American Speech 82:65–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00031283-2007-003.Google Scholar
  96. Rahman, J. 2012. The n word: Its history and use in the African American community. Journal of English Linguistics 40:137–171. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0075424211414807.Google Scholar
  97. Rosch, E., and C. Mervis. 1975. Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology 7:573–605. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9.Google Scholar
  98. Ryan, C., C. Judd, and B. Park. 1996. Effects of racial stereotypes on judgments of individuals: The moderating role of perceived group variability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 32:71–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0004.Google Scholar
  99. Rydell, R., M. Rydell, and K. Boucher. 2010. The effect of negative performance stereotypes on learning. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 99:883–896. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0021139.Google Scholar
  100. Schmader, T., M. Johns, and C. Forbes. 2008. An integrated process model of stereotype threat on performance. Psychological Review 115:336–356. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.115.2.336.Google Scholar
  101. Smith, D. M. 2013. Two Lions say racial slurs show their friendship. NBC Sports, August 8. http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2013/08/08/two-lionssay-racial-slurs-show-their-friendship/.
  102. Smitherman, G. 2000. Black talk: Words and phrases from the hood to the Amen corner. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  103. Sniderman, P., and T. Piazza. 2002. Black pride and black prejudice. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  104. Spears, A. K. 1998. African-American language use: Ideology and so-called obscenity. In African American English, eds. S. Mufwene, J. Rickford, G. Bailey and J. Baugh, 226–250. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  105. Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  106. Steele, C. M. 1997. A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist 52:613–629. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613.Google Scholar
  107. Storrs, D. 1999. Whiteness as stigma: Essentialist identity work by mixed-race women. Symbolic Interaction 22:187–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/si.1999.22.3.187.Google Scholar
  108. Sweetland, J. 2002. Unexpected but authentic use of an ethnically-marked dialect. Journal of Sociolinguistics 6:514–536. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00199.Google Scholar
  109. Szekely, L. 2008. Offensive words. Chewed up. Los Angeles: Image Entertainment.Google Scholar
  110. Tirrell, L. 1999a. Derogatory terms: Racism, sexism, and the inferential role theory of meaning. In Language and liberation: Feminism, philosophy, and language, eds. C. Henricks and K. Oliver, 41–79. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
  111. Tirrell, L. 1999b. Language and power. In A companion to feminist philosophy, ed. A. M. Jaggar and I. M. Young, 139–151. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  112. Tirrell, L. 2012. Genocidal language games. In Speech and harm: Controversies over free speech, eds. I. Maitra and M. K. McGowan, 174–221. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  113. Walton, G. M., and G. L. Cohen. 2003. Stereotype lift. Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology 39:456–467. http://dx.doi.org/0022-1031(03)00019-2.Google Scholar
  114. Wennerberg, H. 1967. The concept of family resemblance in Wittgenstein’s later philosophy. Theoria 33:107–132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-2567.1967.tb00614.x.Google Scholar
  115. Williamson, T. 2003. Understanding and inference. Aristotelian Society Supplementary 77:249–293. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-8349.00111.
  116. Williamson, T. 2009. Reference, inference and the semantics of pejoratives. In The philosophy of David Kaplan, eds. J. Almog and P. Leonardi, 137–159. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Williamson, T. 2010. The use of pejoratives. In The later Wittgenstein on language, ed. D. Whiting, 45–62. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  118. Wilson, D., and D. Sperber. 2004. Relevance theory. In Handbook of pragmatics, eds. L. Horn and G. Ward, 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  119. Wilson, R. 2013. Lions’ Scheffler, Delmas use racial slurs as terms of endearment. CBS Sports, August 8. http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/blog/eye-onfootball/23069221/lions-scheffler-delmas-use-racial-slurs-as-terms-of-endearment-.
  120. Wittgenstein, L. 1953. Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA

Personalised recommendations