The Train Has Left the Station: Latino Aging in the New South

Chapter

Abstract

In the South, as in much of the United States, the demographic train has left the station. For over a decade the region has been attractive to migrants leaving either a Latin American country or areas of the United States with weaker economies and/or higher costs of living. Our projections going out to 2040 show continued growth under virtually all assumptions, signaling a permanent shift in what had traditionally not been a destination for Hispanics. Using U.S. Census data and other sources to develop projections, the core of our argument is that as the cohort of older (65 years and over) Latinos grows in North Carolina, there will be concomitant political shifts. Children who are citizens will eventually become eligible to vote, legislative districts will be transformed, and Hispanic adults will be taking care of a growing elderly population.

References

  1. Abrajano, M., & Alvarez, R. (2011). Hispanic public opinion and partisanship in America. Political Science Quarterly, 126(2), 255–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arias, E. (2012). United States life tables, 2008. National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Reports, 61(3).Google Scholar
  3. Demographics and Workforce Group. (2013). State and national projections methodology: Weldon Cooper center for public service, University of Virginia.Google Scholar
  4. File, T. (2013). The diversifying electorate—voting rates by race and Hispanic origin in 2012 (and other recent elections). US Census Bureau Population Characteristic P20–568.Google Scholar
  5. Flippan, C., & Parrado, E. (2012). Forging Hispanic communities in new destinations: A case study of Durham, North Carolina. City & Community, 11(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (1992). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 189–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hamilton, C. H., & Perry, J. (1962). A short method for projecting population by age from one decennial census to another. Social Forces, 41,163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Levin, I. (2013). Political inclusion of Latino immigrants: Becoming a citizen and political participation. American Politics Research, 41(4) 535–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lopez, M., & Gonzalez-Barrera, A. (2013). Inside the 2012 Latino electorate. Pew Research Hispanic Trends Project, June.Google Scholar
  10. Lopez, M., & Taylor, P. (2012). Latino voters in the 2012 election. Pew Research Hispanic Trends Project, November.Google Scholar
  11. Marrow, H. (2011). New destination dreaming: immigration race, and legal status in the rural American South. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Martin, J. A., Hamilton, B. E., Ventura, S. J., Osterman, M. J. K., Wilson, E. C., & Mathews, T. J. (2012). Births: Final data from 2010. National Center for Health Statistics, Vital Health Reports, 61(1).Google Scholar
  13. Massey, D. (Ed.). (2008). New faces in new places: The changing geography of American immigration. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  14. Merolla, J., Pantoja, A., Cargile, I., & Mora, J. (2013). From coverage to action: The immigration debate and its effects on participation. Political Research Quarterly, 66(2), 322–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mitchell, A. (2005). The ESRI guide to GIS analysis, Volume 2: Spatial measurements & statistics. Redlands: ESRI Press.Google Scholar
  16. Peralta, J., & Larkin, G. (2011). Counting those who count: The impact of Latino population growth on redistricting in southern states. PS: Political Science & Politics, 44(3), 552–561.Google Scholar
  17. Smith, H. A., & Furuseth, O. J. (2008). The ‘Nuevo South’: Latino place making and community building in the middle-ring suburbs of Charlotte. In A. Singer, S. W. Hardwick, & C. B. Brettell (Eds.), Twenty-first century gateways: Immigrant incorporation in Suburban America. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  18. Smith, S., Tayman, J., & Swanson, D. (2001). Population projections for states and local areas: methodology and analysis. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  19. Swanson, D. A., & Tayman, J. (2012). Subnational population estimates. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Torres-Gil, F., Suh, E., & Angel, J. (2013). Working across borders: The social and policy implications of aging in the Americas. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, 28, 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. U.S. Census Bureau (2010). Census of Housing and Population. www.census.gov. Accessed 2013.Google Scholar
  22. Weeks, G. B., & Weeks, J. 2010 Irresistible forces: Latin American migration to the United States and its effects on the south. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  23. Weeks, G. B., Weeks, J. R., & Weeks, A. J. (2007). Latino immigration to the U.S. south: ‘Carolatinos’ and public policy in Charlotte, North Carolina. Latino(a) Research Review, 6(1–2), 50–72.Google Scholar
  24. Winders, J. (2011). Representing the immigrant: Social movements, political discourse, and immigration in the New South. Southeast Geographer, 51(4), 596–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Winkler, R. L., Johnson, K. M., Cheng, C., Voss, P. R., & Curtis, K. J. (2013). County-specific net migration by five-year age groups, Hispanic origin, race, and sex 2000–2010. In CDE Working Paper No. 2013-04. : Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of North CarolinaCharlotteUSA
  2. 2.San Diego State UniversitySan DiegoUSA

Personalised recommendations