Automatic Classification of Coating Epithelial Tissue

  • Claudia Mazo
  • Maria Trujillo
  • Liliana Salazar
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8827)

Abstract

Histology images may be used in E-Learning systems to teach how morphological features and function of each organ contribute to its identification. Automatic classification of coating epithelial cells is an open problem in image processing. This problem has been addressed using morphological gradient, region-based and, shape-based method, among others. In this paper, coating epithelial cells are recognised and classified into: Flat, Cubic and Cylindrical. Epithelial cells are classified based on sphericity and projection. Information about sphericity is used to classify cells into cubic and a measure based in projecting cell nucleus into light region is used to classify into flat and cylindrical. Experimental validations are conducted according to expert criteria, along with manually annotated images, as a ground-truth. Experimental results revealed that the proposed approach recognised coating epithelial cells and classified tissues in a similar way to how experts have performed these classifications.

Keywords

Cell Nucleus Epithelial Tissue Light Region Annotate Image Morphological Gradient 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Gartner, L.P., Hiatt, J., Strum, J.M.: Cell Biology and Histology, 6th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins (2010)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nedzved, A., Ablameyko, S., Pitas, I.: Morphological Segmentation of Histology Cell Images. Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1, 500–503 (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Pham, D.L., Xu, C., Prince, J.L.: A survey of current methods in medical image segmentation. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering, 335–338 (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tsai, A., Yezzi Jr., A., Wells, W., Tempany, C., Tucker, D., Fan, A., Grimson, W.E., Willsky, A.: A shape-based approach to the segmentation of medical imagery using level sets. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 22, 137–154 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Swank, P.R., Greenberg, S.D., Winkler, D.G., Hunter, N.R., Spjut, H.J., Estrada, R., Taylor, G.R.: Nuclear segmentation of bronchial epithelial cells by minimax and thresholding techniques. A comparison. Anal Quant Cytol. 5(3), 153–158 (1983)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Harandi, N.M., Sadri, S., Moghaddam, N.A., Amirfattahi, R.: An automated method for segmentation of epithelial cervical cells in images of Thin Prep. Journal of Medical Systems 34(5), 1043–1058 (2012)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Eramian, M., Daley, M., Neilson, D., Daley, T.: Segmentation of epithelium in H&E stained odontogenic cysts. Journal of Microscopy 244(3) (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tonkin, J., Rees, P., Brown, M., Errington, R., Smith, P., Chappell, S., et al.: Automated cell identification and tracking using nanoparticle moving-light-displays. Journal PLoS One 7, 1–8 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muhimmah, I., Kurniawan, R.: Indrayanti: Automatic Epithelial Cells Detection of Pap smears images using Fuzzy C-Means Clustering. International Proceedings of Chemical, Biological & Environmenta. 29, 122–127 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bibo, L., Chunli, M., Hui, W.: Pixel level image fusion based on linear structure tensor. In: 2010 IEEE Youth Conference on nformation Computing and Telecommunications (YC-ICT), pp. 303–306 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanungo, T., Mount, D.M., Nathan, S.N., Christine, D., Piatko, S.R., Wu, A.Y.: An efficient k-means clustering algorithm: Analysis and implementation. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 24, 881–892 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nosal, E.M.: Flood-fill algorithms used for passive acoustic detection and tracking. In: New Trends for Environmental Monitoring Using Passive Systems, pp. 1–5 (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Merkus, H.G.: Particle Size Measurements: Fundamentals, Practice, Quality, vol. 15. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Deza, E., Deza, M.: Encyclopedia of Distances, pp. 94–98. Springer, Berlin (2009)CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Eves, H.: Mathematical Circles Revisited: A Second Collection of Mathematical Stories and Anecdotes. Prindle, Weber and Schmidt (1972)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heath, L., Thomas, L.: Euclids Elements Thomas. Green Lion Press (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Xiao-Qin, Z., Ng, W., Yeung, D.: Statistical Sensitivity Measure of Single Layer Perceptron Neural Networks to Input Perturbation. Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 3101–3105 (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claudia Mazo
    • 1
  • Maria Trujillo
    • 1
  • Liliana Salazar
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Computer and Systems EngineeringUniversidad del ValleCaliColombia
  2. 2.Department of MorphologyUniversidad del ValleCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations