Advertisement

Water as an Element of Urban Design: Drawing Lessons from Four European Case Studies

  • Carlos Smaniotto CostaEmail author
  • Conor Norton
  • Elena Domene
  • Jacqueline Hoyer
  • Joan Marull
  • Outi Salminen
Chapter
Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)

Abstract

One of the most challenging problems that urban areas will face in the future is adaptation to the effects of climate change, particularly with regard to local problems of water management (e.g., flooding caused by heavy rain events, degradation of urban streams, and water scarcity). Sustainable local management of stormwater calls for approaches that connect technical and ecological solutions with urban design aspects and socioeconomic factors. This in turn opens up great opportunities to advance knowledge toward the application of water-sensitive urban design (WSUD), an approach that integrates the water cycle into urban design to simultaneously minimize environmental degradation, improve aesthetic and recreational appeal, and support social cohesion. A comparative study of four case studies across Europe reveals some of the successes and limits of WSUD implemented so far and presents new considerations for future developments. Best practices on integrated management as well as concepts to re-establish natural water cycles in the urban system while ensuring water quality, river health, and sociocultural values are included. In the selected case studies, water takes a structuring role in urban development, which has been designed to serve diverse public functions and maximize environmental quality, urban renovation, resilience to change and sustainable growth.

Keywords

Water sensitive urban design Decentralized water management Stormwater management Open spaces Urban development Urban design 

References

  1. Barbosa AE, Fernandes JN, David LM (2012) Key issues for sustainable urban stormwater management. Water Res 46(20):6787–6798CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cettner A, Söderholm K, Viklander M (2012) An adaptive stormwater culture? Historical perspectives on the status of stormwater within the Swedish urban water system. J Urban Technol 19(3):25–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cettner A, Ashley R, Hedström A, Viklander M (2013) Sustainable development and urban stormwater practice. Urban Water J:1–13Google Scholar
  4. Chocat B, Ashley R, Marsalek J, Matos MR, Rauch W, Schilling W, Urbonas B (2007) Toward sustainable management of urban storm water. Indoor Built Environ 16 (3):273-285Google Scholar
  5. Coutts AM, Tapper NJ, Beringer J, Loughnan M, Demuzere M (2013) Watering our cities: the capacity for water sensitive urban design to support urban cooling and improve human thermal comfort in the Australian context. Prog Phys Geogr 37(1):2–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dolman N, Savage A, Ogunyoye F (2013) Water-sensitive urban design: learning from experience. Proc Inst Civil Eng-Municipal Eng 166(2):86–97Google Scholar
  7. Domenech L, Sauri D (2012) A comparative appraisal of the use of rainwater harvesting in single and multi-family buildings of the metropolitan area of Barcelona (Spain): social experience, drinking water savings and economic costs. J Clean Prod 19(6–7):598–608Google Scholar
  8. Dublin City Council and The Heritage Council (2012). Green infrastructure strategies for local area plans. DublinGoogle Scholar
  9. Echols S (2007) Artful rainwater design in the urban landscape. J Green Build 2(4):1–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. EEA—European Environment Agency (2010) The European environment state and outlook. CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  11. Eurostat (2012) Around 40 % of the EU27 population live in urban regions and almost a quarter in rural regions. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/cache/ITY_PUBLIC/1-30032012-BP/EN/1-30032012-BP-EN.PDF Accessed on 15 Jan 2013
  12. Farreny R, Morales-Pinzón T, Guisasola A, Taya C, Rieradevall J, Gabarrell X (2011a) Roof selection for rainwater harvesting: quantity and quality assessments in Spain. Water Res 45(10):3245–3254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farreny R, Oliver-Solà J, Montlleó M, Escribà E, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2011b) Transition towards sustainable cities: opportunities, constraints, and strategies in planning. A neighbourhood ecodesign case study in Barcelona. Landscape Urban Plann A 43:1118–1134Google Scholar
  14. Farreny R, Gabarrell X, Rieradevall J (2011c) Cost-efficiency of rainwater harvesting strategies in dense Mediterranean neighbourhoods. Resour Conserv Recycl 55(7):686–694CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Florida R (2002) The rise of the creative class. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Fryd O, Backhaus A, Birch H, Fratini CF, Ingvertsen ST, Jeppesen J et al (2013) Water sensitive urban design retrofits in Copenhagen-40 % to the sewer, 60 % to the city. Water Sci Technol 67(9):1945–1952CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hoyer J, Dickhaut W, Kronawitter L, Weber B (2011) Water sensitive urban design—principles and inspiration for sustainable stormwater management in the city of the future. Jovis, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  18. IPCC (2012) Summary for policymakers. In: Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaptation. A special report of working groups I and II of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–19. http://www.ipcc-wg2.gov/SREX. Accessed on 04 Nov 2013
  19. Krebs G, Rimpiläinen UM, Salminen O (2013) How does imperviousness develop and affect runoff generation in an urbanizing watershed? Fennia 191(2):143–159 Google Scholar
  20. MW—Melbourne Water. n.d. City of Melbourne WSUD guidelines. pp 10–11Google Scholar
  21. Roy A, Wenger S, Fletcher T, Walsh C, Ladson A, Shuster W, Thurston H, Brown R (2008) Impediments and solutions to sustainable, watershed-scale urban stormwater management: lessons from Australia and the United States. Environ Manage 42(2):344–359 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Salminen O, Ahponen H, Valkama P, Vessman T, Rantakokko K, Vaahtera E, Taylor A, Vasander H, Nikinmaa E (2012) Benefits of green infrastructure – socioeconomic importance of constructed urban wetlands (Nummela, Finland). In Kettunen et al (eds) Socio-economic importance of ecosystem services in the Nordic Countries – Synthesis in the context of The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB). Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen pp 247–254Google Scholar
  23. Smaniotto Costa C, Hoyer J (2013) Why invest in urban landscape? The importance of green spaces and water for urban sustainable development. In: Wagner I, Zalewski M, Butterworth J (eds) Ecohydrology in urban areas: experiences of the SWITCH demonstration, City of Lodz, PolandGoogle Scholar
  24. Smaniotto Costa C (2007) Ökonomische Argumente für Grünflächenentwicklung. Stadt und Grün 2:13–19Google Scholar
  25. SWITCH project—managing water for the city of the future. www.switchurbanwater. Accessed on 16 Nov 2012
  26. UNFPA (UN Population Fund) (2007) The state of the World population 2007—unleashing the potential of urban growth. http://www.unfpa.org Accessed on 16 Nov 2012
  27. Walsh C, Roy A, Feminella J, Cottingham P, Groffman P, Morgan R (2005) The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J North Am Benthol Soc 24(3):706–723CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carlos Smaniotto Costa
    • 1
    Email author
  • Conor Norton
    • 2
  • Elena Domene
    • 3
  • Jacqueline Hoyer
    • 4
  • Joan Marull
    • 3
  • Outi Salminen
    • 5
  1. 1.Department of Urban PlanningUniversidade Lusófona de Humanidades e TecnologiasLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.School of Spatial PlanningDublin Institute of TechnologyDublin 1Ireland
  3. 3.Barcelona Institute of Regional and Metropolitan Studies (IERMB), Edifici MRAAutonomous University of BarcelonaBellaterra, BarcelonaSpain
  4. 4.Sustainable Urban and Infrastructure PlanningHafenCity Universität HamburgHamburgGermany
  5. 5.Department of Forest SciencesUniversity of HelsinkiHelsinkiFinland

Personalised recommendations