Acceptance of Process Innovations in Hospitals: Insights from the German Arthroplasty Register
- 1.8k Downloads
Process innovations in hospitals are of particular relevance because they have the potential to improve quality of care and patient safety, among other aspects. To ensure their success, a high level of employee acceptance of the innovation is required. This study analyzes the factors influencing the acceptance of process innovations in hospitals based on the introduction of the German Arthroplasty Register. The German Arthroplasty Register is an extensive database containing information about a frequently performed surgery in German hospitals—artificial hip and knee joint replacements. The introduction of the register requires process changes within existing hospital structures. Interviewers conducted semi-structured interviews with 47 employees in 20 hospitals, which had recently introduced the German Arthroplasty Register. All interviews were recorded and transcribed, and qualitative content analysis was applied to the systematic text analysis. Results suggest that three major factors influence process-innovation acceptance in hospitals: (1) organizational factors, (2) project-related factors, and (3) people-related factors.
KeywordsProject-related Factors Requires Process Changes Systematic Text Analysis Knee Joint Replacement Influence Acceptance
Supported by Stiftung Endoprothetik.
- Bryman A, Bell E (2007) Business research methods. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev 14:532–550Google Scholar
- Hopf C (1995) Qualitative Interviews in der Sozialforschung. Ein Überblick. In: Flick U, Kardorff Ev, Keupp H, Rosenstiel Lv, Wolff S (eds) Handbuch Qualitative Sozialforschung. Grundlagen, Konzepte, Methoden und Anwendungen, 2nd edn. Beltz, Psychologie-Verlags-Union, Weinheim, pp 177–182Google Scholar
- Klein KJ, Sorra JS (1996) The challenge of innovation implementation. Acad Manage Rev 21:1055–1080Google Scholar
- Lamnek S (1995) Qualitative Sozialforschung. Beltz, Psychologie-Verlags-Union, WeinheimGoogle Scholar
- Mayring P (2010) Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Grundlagen und Techniken. Beltz, Weinheim und BaselGoogle Scholar
- Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Vera A, Kuntz L (2007) Prozessorientierte Organisation und Effizienz im Krankenhaus. Schmalenbachs Zeitschrift für betriebswirtschaftliche Forschung 59:173–197Google Scholar
- Yin RK (2009) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar