Earth Stewardship pp 173-194

Part of the Ecology and Ethics book series (ECET, volume 2) | Cite as

Earth Stewardship: An Initiative by the Ecological Society of America to Foster Engagement to Sustain Planet Earth

  • F. Stuart ChapinIII
  • S. T. A. Pickett
  • Mary E. Power
  • Scott L. Collins
  • Jill S. Baron
  • David W. Inouye
  • Monica G. Turner
Chapter

Abstract

The Ecological Society of America (ESA) has responded to the growing commitment among ecologists to make their science relevant to society through a series of concerted efforts, including the Sustainable Biosphere Initiative (1991), scientific assessment of ecosystem management (1996), ESA’s vision for the future (2003), Rapid Response Teams that respond to environmental crises (2005), and the Earth Stewardship Initiative (2009). During the past 25 years, ESA launched five new journals, largely reflecting the expansion of scholarship linking ecology with broader societal issues. The goal of the Earth Stewardship Initiative is to raise awareness and to explore ways for ecologists and other scientists to contribute more effectively to the sustainability of our planet. This has occurred through four approaches: (1) articulation of the stewardship concept in ESA publications and Website, (2) selection of meeting themes and symposia, (3) engagement of ESA sections in implementing the initiative, and (4) outreach beyond ecology through collaborations and demonstration projects. Collaborations include societies and groups of Earth and social scientists, practitioners and policy makers, religious and business leaders, federal agencies, and artists and writers. The Earth Stewardship Initiative is a work in progress, so next steps likely include continued nurturing of these emerging collaborations, advancing the development of sustainability and stewardship theory, improving communication of stewardship science, and identifying opportunities for scientists and civil society to take actions that move the Earth toward a more sustainable trajectory.

Keywords

Earth Stewardship Initiative Ecological Society of America Interdisciplinary integration Practitioner Engagement Sustainability 

References

  1. AGU (2013) Helping audiences receive climate-science information: a message framework for scientists. Unpublished reportGoogle Scholar
  2. Bonilla NO, Scholl J, Armstrong M et al (2012) Ecological science and public policy: an intersection of action ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 93:340–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Callicott JB (2015) The centennial return of stewardship to the Ecological Society of America. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 161–171Google Scholar
  4. Chapin FS III, Fernandez E (2013) Proactive ecology for the Anthropocene. Elementa. doi:10.12952/journal.elementa.000013
  5. Chapin FS III, Power ME, Pickett STA et al (2011) Earth stewardship: science for action to sustain the human-earth system. Ecosphere 2(8):art89 doi:10.1890/ES11-00166.1
  6. Chapin FS III, Kofinas GP, Folke C (eds) (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-based natural resource management in a changing World. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen NL, Bartuska AM, Brown JH et al (1996) The report of the Ecological Society of America committee on the scientific basis for ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 6:665–691CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14):8059–8061CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Clark WC, Levin SA (2010) Toward a science of sustainability. Princeton Environmental Institute, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins SL, Carpenter SR, Swinton SM et al (2011) An integrated conceptual framework for long-term social-ecological research. Front Ecol Environ 9:351–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colón-Rivera RJ, Marshall K, Soto-Santiago FJ et al (2013) Moving forward: fostering the next generation of Earth stewards in the STEM disciplines. Front Ecol Environ 11:383–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conradie E (2006) Christianity and ecological theology: resources for further research. Sun Press, StellenboschGoogle Scholar
  13. DeFries R, Ellis E, Chapin FS III et al (2012) Plantetary opportunities: a social contract for global change science to contribute to a sustainable future. BioScience 62(6):603–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis EC, Ramankutty N (2008) Putting people on the map: anthropogenic biomes of the world. Front Ecol Environ 6(8):439–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Felson AJ, Pickett STA (2005) Designed experiments: new approaches to studying urban ecosystems. Front Ecol Environ 3:549–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Felson AJ, Bradford MA, Terway TM (2013) Promoting Earth stewardship through urban design experiments. Front Ecol Environ 11:362–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foley JA, DeFries R, Asner GP et al (2005) Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570–574CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Goralnik L, Nelson MP, Ryan L et al (2015) Arts and humanities efforts in the US Long-Term Ecological Research (LTER) network: understanding perceived values and challenges. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 249–268Google Scholar
  19. Hargrove E (2015) Stewardship versus citizenship. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 315–323Google Scholar
  20. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability. Working group II contribution to the IPCC 5th assessment report. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Kates RW, Clark WC, Corell RW et al (2001) Sustainability science. Science 292(5517):641–642CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Kearns L, Keller C (2007) Eco-spirit: religions and philosophy for the Earth. Fordham University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. Kierulff MCM, Ruiz-Miranda CR, de Oliveira PP et al (2012) The Golden lion tamarin Leontopithecus rosalia: a conservation success story. Int Zoo Yearb 46(1):36–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kingsland SE (2015) Ecological science and practice: dialogues across cultures and disciplines. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 17–26Google Scholar
  25. Lubchenco J (2012) Reflections on the sustainable biosphere initiative. Bull Ecol Soc Am 93:260–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lubchenco J, Olson AM, Brubaker LB et al (1991) The sustainable biosphere initiative: an ecological research agenda. Ecology 72:371–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall K, Hamlin J, Armstrong M et al (2011) Science for a social revolution: ecologists entering the realm of action. Bull Ecol Soc Am 92:241–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Matson PA (2009) The sustainability transition. Issues Sci Technol 25(4):39–42Google Scholar
  29. May Jr RH (2015) Andean llamas and earth stewardship. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 77–86Google Scholar
  30. MEA (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: current status and trends, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKGoogle Scholar
  31. Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) (2014) Climate change impacts in the United States: the third National Climate Assessment. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  32. Muñoz-Erickson T, Aguilar-Gonzáles B, Loeser MR et al (2009) A framework to evaluate ecological and social outcomes of collaborative management: lessons from implementation with a northern Arizona collaborative group. Environ Manage 45:132–144CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. NRC (1999) Our common journey: a transition toward sustainability. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. NRC (2010) America’s climate choices: adapting to the impacts of climate change. National Academies Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  35. Odum EP (1989) Ecology and our endangered life-support systems. Sinauer Associates, SunderlandGoogle Scholar
  36. Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Chornesky E et al (2004) Ecology for a crowded planet. Science 304:1251–1252CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Chornesky EA et al (2005) Ecological science and sustainability for the 21st century. Front Ecol Environ 3:4–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, McGrath M (eds) (2013) Resilience in ecology and urban design: linking theory and practice for sustainable cities. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  39. Power ME, Bouma-Gregson K, Higgins P, Carlson SM (2015) The thirsty eel: summer and winter flow thresholds that tilt the eel river of northwestern California from salmon-supporting to cyanobacterially degraded states. Copeia 103(1) (in press)Google Scholar
  40. Power ME, Chapin FS III (2009) Planetary stewardship. Front Ecol Environ 7(8):399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramos J, Lymn N, Salguero-Gomez R et al (2012) Ecological Society of America’s initiatives and contributions during the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Bull Ecol Soc Am 93:115–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rivera N, Calderon-Ayala J, Calle L et al (2010) Multidisciplinary and multimedia approaches to action-oriented ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 91:313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K et al (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C et al (eds) (2013) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing World: values, philosophy, and action. Springer, Dordrecht/Heidelberg/New York/LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Sayre N (2005) Working wilderness: the Malpai Borderlands Group and the future of the western range. Rio Nuevo Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  46. Sayre NF, Kelty R, Simmons M et al (2013) Invitation to earth stewardship. Front Ecol Environ 11:339CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Silbert S, Chandler G, Nabhan GP (eds) (2007) Five ways to value working landscapes of the West. Center for Sustainable Environments, Northern Arizona University, FlagstaffGoogle Scholar
  48. Sisk TD (2010) Ranching, local ecological knowledge, and the stewardship of public lands. In: Power ME, Chapin FS III (eds) Planetary stewardship in a changing world: paths toward resilience and sustainability. Bull Ecol Soc Am 91(2):150–152Google Scholar
  49. Sisk TD, Albano CM, Aumack EA et al (2010) Integrating restoration and conservation objectives at the landscape scale: the Kane and Two-mile Ranch project. In: van Riper C III, Wakeling BW, Sisk TD (eds) The Colorado Plateau IV: shaping conservation through science and management. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 45–66Google Scholar
  50. Steffen WL, Sanderson A, Tyson PD et al (2004) Global change and the Earth system: a planet under pressure. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Steffen W, Jansson Å, Deutsch L et al (2011) The Anthropocene: from global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio. doi:10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x
  52. Steiner F, Simmons M, Gallagher M et al (2013) The ecological imperative for environmental design and planning. Front Ecol Environ 11(7):355–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stern N (2007) The economics of climate change: the Stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UKCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Szaro RC, Johnson ND, Sexton WT et al (eds) (1999) Ecological stewardship: a common reference for ecosystem management. Elsevier, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  55. Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson PA et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14):8074–8079CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. UN (2010) The millennium development goals report 2010. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  57. WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  58. Yoshiyama RM, Moyle P (2010) Historical review of Eel River Anadromous Salmonids, with emphasis on Chinook salmon, Coho salmon and steelhead. Report for California Trout. 1–107, Center for Watershed Sciences, University of California, DavisGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Stuart ChapinIII
    • 1
  • S. T. A. Pickett
    • 2
  • Mary E. Power
    • 3
  • Scott L. Collins
    • 4
  • Jill S. Baron
    • 5
  • David W. Inouye
    • 6
  • Monica G. Turner
    • 7
  1. 1.Institute of Arctic BiologyUniversity of Alaska FairbanksFairbanksUSA
  2. 2.Cary Institute of Ecosystem StudiesMillbrookUSA
  3. 3.Department of Integrative BiologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA
  4. 4.Department of BiologyUniversity of New MexicoAlbuquerqueUSA
  5. 5.Fort Collins Science CenterU.S. Geological SurveyFort CollinsUSA
  6. 6.Department of BiologyUniversity of MarylandCollege ParkUSA
  7. 7.Department of ZoologyUniversity of WisconsinMadisonUSA

Personalised recommendations