Skip to main content

Life Cycle Assessment in the agri-food sector: an overview of its key aspects, international initiatives, certification, labelling schemesand methodological issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector

Abstract

Sustainable development and, above all, sustainable production and consumption in the agri-food sector have been key issues since the 2000s, stimulating the creation of many international initiatives and strategies aimed at reducing environmental impacts deriving from food production and consumption and at finding more sustainable ways of production. This first chapter is designed to provide the reader with an as exhaustive as possible overview of the key concerns, applications, and methodological issues of agri-food life cycle assessment (LCA). On this scale the major international initiatives (with a special focus on two relevant and recent European ones), eco-labels and declarations, and footprints (at product level, based on an LCA approach) developed so far are reported. Some of the most important LCA initiatives developed by agricultural and livestock operators, the industry sector, logistics sector, trade, and the end of life of packaging and/or food waste operators are also described in the chapter. Considering that one of the key issues within the agri-food sector is the lack of reliable and up-to-date inventory data on food products and processes, the state of the art of the major existing international LCI databases is reported, and the national and international initiatives currently under development highlighted. Finally, the chapter takes into account dietary issues in the sense that in the context of food sustainability the importance of consumer behaviour and, in particular, dietary behaviour is becoming increasingly recognised, together with the product and its production chain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The newly revised Strategic Research and Innovation Agenda (SRIA) “2013–2020 and Beyond” now focusses specifically on innovation.

  2. 2.

    CO2 is the only GHG taken into account.

  3. 3.

    Carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6): the six GHGs identified by the Kyoto Protocol.

References

  • Alexandratos, N., & Bruinsma, J. (2012). World agriculture toward 2030/2050—the 2012 Revision. ESA working paper No. 12–03, Agricultural Development Economics Division, Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/esa/Global_persepctives/world_ag_2030_50_2012_rev.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Allan, J. (1998). Virtual water: A strategic resource global solutions to regional deficits. Groundwater, 36, 545–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berzina, S., & Shevchenko, I. (2011, August). Methodology of ecological criteria development for products under ecolabelling program of type I. Paper presented at LCM 2011—Towards life cycle sustainability management, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beverage Industry Environmental RoundTable (BIER). (2011). A practical perspective on the water accounting in the beverage sector. http://media.wix.com/ugd/49d7a0_ad1fcedf02b04ea38015a976991c1137.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Beverage Industry Environmental RoundTable (BIER). (2012a). research on the carbon footprint of beer. http://media.wix.com/ugd/49d7a0_70726e8dc94c456caf8a10771fc31625.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Beverage Industry Environmental RoundTable (BIER). (2012b). research on the carbon footprint of bottled water. http://media.wix.com/ugd/49d7a0_824b8dcfeaa74427a56b57abb8e2417e.pdf. Accessed Jan 10 2014.

  • Beverage Industry Environmental RoundTable (BIER). (2012c). research on the carbon footprint of soft drinks. http://media.wix.com/ugd/49d7a0_7a5cfa72d8e74c04be5aeb81f38b136b.pdf. Accessed Jan 10 2014.

  • Beverage Industry Environmental RoundTable (BIER). (2012d). Research on the carbon footprint of spirits. http://media.wix.com/ugd/49d7a0_7643fd3fae5d4daf939cd5373389e4e0.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Beverage Industry Environmental RoundTable (BIER). (2012e). research on the carbon footprint of wine. http://media.wix.com/ugd/49d7a0_4d74ddfdfbd64d3a8c1b27c17f460e36.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Beverage Industry Environmental RoundTable. (BIER). (2013). Beverage industry sector guidance for greenhouse gas emissions reporting. http://media.wix.com/ugd/49d7a0_6339d006853c4d3bbdf6087b43d91580.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Bio Intelligence Service. (2010). Preparatory study on food waste across EU 27. European Commission (DG ENV). Directorate C-Industry. Executive summary. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/bio_foodwaste_sum.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Birkved, M., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2006). PestLCI—a model for estimating field emissions of pesticides in agricultural LCA. Ecological Modelling, 198, 433–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanke, M., & Schaefer, F. (2012, October). Application of PAS 2050–1 supplementary requirements for horticultural products: Carbon footprint of pumpkin and asparagus. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector, Saint Malò.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandi, C. (2012). Low carbon standards and labels in rising powers. Working paper no. 5. http://www.risingpowers.net/sites/default/files/RisingPowers_WP5_Brandi.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • British Standard Institute (BSI). (2013). PAS 2050—Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services. http://shop.bsigroup.com/Browse-By-Subject/Environmental-Management-and-Sustainability. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Carles, G., et al. (2013, August). LCADB.SUDOE: Life cycle inventories database of the southwest of Europe. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on life cycle management—LCM 2013, Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson-Kanyama, A. (1998). Climate change and dietary choices—how can emissions of greenhouse gases from food consumption be reduced? Food Policy, 23(3/4), 277–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson-Kanyama, A., Pipping Ekström, M., & Shanahan, H. (2003). Food and life cycle energy in-puts: Consequences of diet and ways to increase efficiency. Ecological Economics, 44, 293–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China Environmental United Certification Centre (CEC) (n.d.). China Environmental Labeling Program. http://www.city.sendai.jp/kankyou/kanri/icgps-e/pdf/special_1-4.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Chomkhamsri, K., & Pelletier, N. (2011). Analysis of existing environmental footprint methodologies for product and organizations: Recommendations, rationale, and alignment. European Commission—Joint research Centre—Institute for Environmental and Sustainability (EC-JRC-IES). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/eussd/pdf/Deliverable.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • COM. (2003). 302 def. communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament “Integrated Product Policy—Building on Environmental Life-Cycle Thinking”.

    Google Scholar 

  • COM. (2008). 397 def. communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Commitee and the Committee of the Regions on the “Sustainable Consumption and Production and Sustainable Industrial Policy Action Plan”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumer Goods Forum (CGF). (2012). Initiatives in sustainability product measurement. http://www.theconsumergoodsforum.com/PDF/WorkingGroups-Accordion/Sustainability/11.CGF%20Sustainability%20Measurement%20-%20overview%20initiatives%20-%20June%202012.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Čuček, L., Klemes, J. J., & Kravanja, Z. (2012). A review of footprints analysis tools for monitoring impacts on sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 34, 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., & Sonesson, U. (2008). Life cycle assessment of integrated food chains—a Swedish case study of two chicken meals. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 13, 574–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, J., Sonesson, U., Baumgartner, D. U., & Nemecek, T. (2010). Environmental impact of four meals with different protein sources: Case studies in Spain and Sweden. Food Research International, 43(7), 1874–1884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawoon, J., Beon-Young, P., Soohyun, C., & Touseef, A. (2013, August). CO2 emission for the production of beef in South Korea. Paper presented at the 59th ICoMST international congress of meat science and technology, Izmir.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Boer, J., Helms, M., & Aiking, H. (2006). Protein consumption and sustainability: Diet diversity in EU-15. Ecological Economics, 59, 267–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Camillis, et al. (2012, October). ENVIFOOD Protocol: Launch of the collectively-agreed sectorial methodology for assessing the environmental performance of food and drink products in Europe. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector, Saint Malò.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Borghi, A. (2013). LCA and communication: Environmental Product Declaration. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18, 293–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delahaye, M. G. (2008). Product and carbon footprint: The example of a major retail group. http://archives.dgcis.gouv.fr/2012/www.pme.gouv.fr/europe/pres2008/an/TR3/6_G_Delahaye_Anglais.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2014.

  • Dijkman, T.J., Birkved, M., & Hauschild, M. Z. (2012). PestLCI 2.0: A second generation model for estimating emissions of pesticides from arable land in LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17, 973–986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dordan (n.d.). How to assess sustainable packaging: An overview of the tools and resources available. http://leadwise.mediadroit.com/files/18826HowtoAssessSusPkgfordistribution.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Dron, D. (2012, October). Sustainable food, a component of the green economy. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector, Saint Malò.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earthsure®. (2012). Environmental product declarations general program instructions. http://iere.org/wp-content/uploads/Earthsure-General-Program-2012-Final.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013

  • Ecological Union (2013). Life cycle ecolabelling program “Vitality leaf” for product, work and services. http://www.ecounion.ru/en/site.php?&blockType=251. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Emhart, C., Florenzano, A., Loyola, C., Bengtsson, J. (2013, August). Chilean food & agriculture lca database using Unep/Setac Shonan principles. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on life cycle management—LCM 2013, Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Environdec. (2013). http://www.environdec.com/en/PCR/. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • European Food Sustainable Production and Consumption Round Table (EU Food SCP RT). (2013). Voluntary pilot testing of the ENVIFOOD protocol and communication tools. http://www.food-scp.eu/node/72. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • FAO. (n.d.). http://www.fao.org/partnerships/leap/livestock-partnership/en/. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Fefac. (2013, July). Feed facts—International news. http://www.fefac.eu/files/47325.pdf.

  • Galli, A., Wiedmann, T., Ercin, E., Knoblauch, D., Ewing, B., & Giljum, S. (2012). Integrating ecological, carbon and water footprint into a “Footprint Family” of indicators: Definition and role in tracking human pressure on the planet. Ecological indicators, 16, 100–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, P. J., Steinfeld, H., Henderson, B., Mottet, A., Opio, C., Dijkman, J., Falcucci, A., & Tempio, G. (2013). Tackling climate change through livestock—A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO).

    Google Scholar 

  • Geyer, R., Stoms, D. M., Lindner, J. P., Davis, F. W., & Wittstock, B. (2010). Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use: Impact assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 14, 692–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gheewala, S. H. (2012, October). Challenges for LCA in the agri-food sector, perspective from Thailand and Southeast Asia. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector, Saint Malò.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheewala, S. H., & Mungkung, R. (2013). Product carbon footprinting and labeling in Thailand: Experiences from an exporting nation. Carbon Management, 4, 547–554.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Global Footprint Network. (2012). Application standards. http://www.footprintnetwork.org/en/index.php/GFN/page/application_standards/. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Grant, T., Eady, S., & Winter, S. (2012, March). Development of a Australian national inventory for agriculture. Paper presented at the 2nd New Zealand life cycle assessment conference—LCA: A business compass for sustainable development, Auckland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, K., Shobatake, K., Makino, N., & Hukazono, S. (2012). Developing of a life cycle inventory database for agricultural production systems in Japan: The JALCA database. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference of Ecobalance, Yokohama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M., & Keoleian, G. (2003). Assessing the sustainability of the US food system: A life cycle perspective. Agricultural Systems, 76(3), 1007–1041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller, M. C., Keoleian, G. A., & Willett, W. C. (2013). Toward a life cycle-based, diet-level frame-work for food environmental impact and nutritional quality assessment: A critical review. Environmental Science and Technology, 47(22), 12632–12647.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, A. Y. (2003, December). Virtual water trade. Paper presented at the international expert meeting on virtual water trade, the Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoekstra, A. Y., Chapagain, A. K., Aldaya, M. M., & Mekonnen, M. M. (2009). Water footprint manual—State of the Art 2009. Enschede: Water Footprint Network.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD). (1996). Ecolabelling: Its implication for China. http://www.iisd.org/pdf/ecochina.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO). (2001). ISO 14024 Environmental labels and declarations type I environmental labelling. Principles and procedures. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO). (2002a). ISO 14020 Environmental labels and declarations—General principles. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO). (2002b). ISO 14021 Environmental labels and declarations—Self declared environmental claims. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO). (2006a). ISO 14025 Environmental labels and declarations—Type III environmental declarations. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Internationa Standard Organisation (ISO). (2006b). ISO 14040. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO). (2006c). ISO 14044. Life cycle assessment—Requirements and guidelines. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Standard Organisation (ISO). (2013). ISO 14067 Greenhouses gases—carbon footprint of products- requirements and guidelines for quantification and communication. Geneva: ISO.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Trade Center (ICT). (2012). Product carbon footprinting standards in the agri-food sector. Technical paper. http://www.intracen.org/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=58175. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • International Trade Centre (ICT) (2013). China environmental labelling—CEL. http://search.standardsmap.org/assets/media/ChinaEnvironmentalLabeling/English/AtAGlance_EN.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • JEMAI CFP Program (2013). http://www.cfp-japan.jp/english/news/. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Jungbluth, N., Tietje, O., & Scholz, R. W. (2000). Food purchases: Impacts from the consumers’ point of view investigated with a modular LCA. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 5(3), 134–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungbluth, N., Itten, R., & Schori, S. (2012). Environmental impacts of food consumption and its reduction potentials. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector, St-Malò, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kägi, T., Zschokke, M., & Dinkel, F. (2012). Nutrient based functional unit for meals. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector, St-Malò, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanzaki, M. (2009). EcoLeaf label-LIfe-cycle analysis for ICT goods and services. OECD Conference on ICTs, the Environment and Climate Change. http://www.cdn.netamia.com/itst/ict2009/the_ecoleaf_label_life-cycle_analysis_for_ict_goods_and_services-190-1243422458.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Kellenberger, D. (2007, November). Modelling principles for the collection of consistent and comprehensive LCI data. Paper presented at the New Zealand sustainable building conference (SB07), Auckland, .

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Dale, B. (2006). Ethanol fuels: E10 or E85—life cycle perspectives. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 11(2), 117–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, P., et al. (2011, August). Methodological guidelines for LCA of French agricultural products. Paper presented at LCM 2011—Towards life cycle sustainability management, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Köhler, A., & Aoustin, E. (2008, May). Project group on assessment of use and depletion of water resources within LCA. UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative SETAC Europe annual meeting, Warsaw Ecological Systems Design Group. http://www.wulca-waterlca.org/pdf/wulca.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Kounina, A., Margni, M., Bayart, J. B., Boulay, A. M., Berger, M., Bulle, C., Frischknecht, R., Koehler, A., Milà I Canals, L., Motoshita, M., Núñez, M., Peters, G., Pfister, S., Ridoutt, B., Van Zelm, R., Verones, F., & Humbert, S. (2013). Review of methods addressing freshwater use in life cycle inventory and impact assessment. International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 18(3), 707–721.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lansche, J., et al. (2013, August). The world food LCA database project: Towards more accurate food datasets. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on life cycle management—LCM 2013, Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ledgard, S. F., Lieffering, M., McDevitt, J., Boyes, M., & Kemp, R. (2010). A greenhouse gas footprint study for exported New Zealand lamb. http://www.fedfarm.org.nz/files/2010-Lamb-CarbonFootprint.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Leip, A., Weiss, F., Wassenaar, T., Perez, I., Loudjani, T., Tubiello, F., et al. (2010). Evaluation of the livestock sector’s contribution to the EU greenhouse gas emission—final report. European Commission, Joint Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lessard, L., Vionnet, S., Dettling, J., Humbert, S., Henderson, A., Jolliet, O., & Wang, Y. (2012, October). Water footprint of cradle to farm gate milk production in the U.S. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on life cycle assessment in the agri-food sector, Saint Malo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L. C., Pei, D. C., Chen, C. C., Yen, W. S., Lui, C. C., & Lee, W. S. (2013, August). The industry views on the policy and development of carbon labeling in Taiwan. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on life cycle management—LCM 2013, Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lo Giudice, A., & Clasadonte, M. T. (2010). The EPD for the agro-food chain products. Calitatea-acces la success: Facing the challenges of the future—excellence in business and commodity sciences, special issue, 11, 472–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod, M., Gerber, P., Mottet, A., Tempio, G., Falcucci, A., Opio, C., Vellinga, T., Henderson, B., & Steinfeld, H. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from pig and chicken supply chains—A global life cycle assessment. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magerholm Fet, A. (2012). Harmonization of documentation for EPD-generation—the Norwegian model. http://ww2.unime.it/emaf/images/eventi/Messina/ppt_convegno/6_Fet.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Mars, C., et al. (2011, May). The Sustainability Consortium update: Type III product declaration development for laptops. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Sustainable Systems and Technology (ISSST), Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masoni, P., Fantin, V., & Zamagni, A. (2012). Matodi e certificazioni per misurare la sostenibilità. Ecoscienza, 5, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, P. S. (2007). Why was India’s Ecomark scheme unsuccessful?.CUTS Centre for International Trade, Economics & Environment. Jaipur Printers P. Ltd. http://www.cuts-citee.org/pdf/RREPORT07-01.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Meier, T., & Christen, O. (2012). Gender as a factor in an environmental assessment of the consumption of animal and plant based foods in Germany. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 17(5), 550–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner Schau, E., & Magerholm Fet, A. (2008). LCA studies of Food Products as background for environmental products declarations. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millward, D. J., & Garnett. T. (2010). Plenary lecture 3: Food and the planet: Nutritional dilemmas of green-house gas emission reductions through reduced intakes of meat and dairy foods. The Proceedings of Nutrition Society, 69(1), 103–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry for Primary Industry (MPI). (2013). Greenhouse gas (GHG) footprinting strategy. http://www.mpi.govt.nz/environment-natural-resources/climate-change/greenhouse-gas-footprinting-strategy.aspx. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Mungkung, R., & Gheewala, S. H. (2012, October). Carbon footprinting and labeling of agri-food products: Practical issues for the development of Product Category Rules. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector, Saint Malò.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, I., Milà i Canals, L., & Fernández-Alba, A. R. (2010). Life cycle assessment of the average Spanish diet including human excretion. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 794–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North-East Asian Subregional Programme for Environmental Cooperation (NEASPEC). (2012). http://www.neaspec.org/documents/eco_may_2012/Day1-Scheme_Products%20Category-Russia.pdf. Accessed Nov 12 2013.

  • Notarnicola, B., Hayashi, K., Curran, M. A., & Huisingh, D. (2012a). Progress working towards a more sustainable agri-food industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 28, 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., & Renzulli, P. A. (2012b). Modeling the agri-food industry with life cycle assessment. In M. A. Curran (Ed.) Life Cycle assessment handbook (pp. 159–184). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P. A., Lo Giudice, A., Colombo, N., Costantino, E. (2014). Environmental sustainability of foods: The Meneghina Express project. Paper presented at the XXVI National Congress of Commodity science, Pisa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakdene Hollins Research and Consulting (2011). EU ecolabel for food and feed products—feasibility study (ENV. C.1/ETU/2010/0025). http://ec.europa.eu/environment/ecolabel/documents/Ecolabel_for_food_final_report.pdf. Accessed Nov 12, 2013.

  • Opio, C., Gerber, P., Mottet, A., Falcucci, A., Tempio, G., MacLeod, M., Vellinga, T., Henderson, B., & Steinfeld, H. (2013). Greenhouse gas emissions from ruminant supply chains—A global life cycle assessment. Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations (FAO), Rome.

    Google Scholar 

  • PCR Library. (2013). Search for countries: Japan. http://pcr-library.edf.org.tw/product_country/japan.asp. Accessed Nov 12 2013.

  • PCF World Forum. (2010). International developments in product carbon footprinting and carbon labelling. PCF World Forum News 2/ March. http://www.pef-world-forum.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/03/pcf-world-forum-news2_march-2010.pdf. Accessed Nov 12 2013.

  • Redd, T. (2011). Eco-Babble: A science based, multi-stakeholder approach. The sustainability consortium. http://www.gmaonline.org/uploadFiles/184D0B0000002F.filename.REDD_EcoBabble.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Reisch, L., Eberle, U., & Lorek, S. (2013). Sustainable food consumption: An overview of contemporary issues and policies. Sustainability: Science, Practice, & Policy, 9, 7–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sala, S., et al. (2013). Water footprint in the context of sustainability assessment. Report on the application of life cycle based indicators of water consumption in the context of integrated sustainability impact analysis. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for environment and sustainability. EUR 25781EN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seda, M., Antòn, A., & Munoz, P. (2010, September). Analysing the influence of the functional unit in agricultural LCA. Paper presented at the LCA Food 2010 Conference. Bari, Italy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seo, M. (2009). Korea carbon footprint labeling and its activities, KEITI. http://www.ftis.org.tw/active/download/1_6.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Smedman, A., Lindmark-Månsson, H., Drewnowski, A., & Edman, A. K. M. (2010). Nutrient density of beverages in relation to climate impact. Food & Nutrition Research 54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soussana, J. F. (2012, October). Research priorities for sustainable agri-food systems and LCA. Paper presented at the 8th international conference on LCA in the agri-food sector, St-Malò, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suppen, N., & Felix, R. (2013, August). The Mexican life cycle inventory database—Mexicaniuh. Paper presented at the 6th international conference on life cycle management—LCM 2013, Gothenburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesco (2012, April). http://www.tescoplc.com/files/pdf/factsheets/footprint_gallery.pdf.

  • The Grocer. (2012). http://www.thegrocer.co.uk/companies/supermarkets/tesco/frustrated-tesco-ditches-eco-labels/225502.article?utm_medium=email&utm_source=groceronline%40wrbm.com&utm_campaign=1145974_Daily.

  • Tukker, A., Huppes, G., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., de Koning, A., van Oers, L., et al. (2006). Environmental impacts of products (EIPRO). Analysis of the life cycle environmental impacts related to the total final consumption of the EU-25, Sevilla, Spain: European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (IPTS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Udo de Haes, H. A., & de Snoo, G. R. (2012). Eco-labelling of agricultural food products. In U. Sonesson, J. Beril, & F. Ziegler (Eds.), Environmental assessment and management in the food industry. Life cycle assessment and related approaches (pp. 374–397). Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vergez, D. (2012). Display of the environmental footprint of products: French developments in the food sector. Department of the commissioner general fro sustainable development (CGDD). http://www.developpement-durable.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/ED64EN.pdf. Accessed 12 Nov 2013.

  • Vermeulen, S. J., Campbell, B. M., & Ingram, J. S. I. (2012). Climate change and food systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 195–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island: New Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernet, G., Stucki, M., Shenoy, M., & Muthusezhiyan, N. (2011, August). Establishing a data framework for life cycle management in India. Paper presented at LCM 2011—Towards life cycle sustainability management, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zamagni A., Buttol P., Porta, P. L., Buonamici, R., Masoni, P., Guinée, J., Heijungs, R., Ekvall, T., Bersani, R., Bienkowska, A., Pretato, U. (2008). Critical review of the current research needs and limitations related to ISO-LCA practice. Deliverable D7 of work package 5 of the CALCAS project. ENEA. Rome.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Notarnicola .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Conclusions

Conclusions

This first chapter was written as an introduction to the later ones, focussed on specific agri-food sectors, and as a reference basis for the readers of this book. Its aim is to provide an as exhaustive as possible overview of the key concerns, applications, and methodological issues of the LCA methodology applied to the agri-food sector.

The first part of the chapter was devoted to the description of the major international initiatives, eco-labels and declarations, and footprints developed at product level and based on an LCA approach. The significant hotspots which emerged in this context are:

  • The relevant role and commitment of, above all, the European Commission and governments toward issues of sustainable production and consumption. The recent development of the “EU Environmental Footprint” (EF) initiative and the European Food Sustainable Consumption and Production Roundtable are proof of this.

  • The huge number of eco-labelling and footprint systems developed may generate confusion and mistrust among consumers and all the involved stakeholders. It is evident that a step towards harmonisation among all the existing standards and methods is more than desirable. In this context, for example, the new EU Environmental Footprint system has the aim of “…establishing a common methodological approach …for assessing, displaying, and benchmarking the environmental performance of products/services/companies based on a comprehensive assessment of environmental impacts over the life-cycle”.

The section devoted to the role played by the different actors of the supply chain in the development and consolidation of the LCA methodology as an essential tool for the assessment of the environmental performance of food products highlighted that:

  • Many initiatives (at national and international level) have been, and are still being, developed by agricultural and livestock operators, the industry sector, logistic and trading, and the end of life of packaging and/or food waste operators. Within the industry sector, in particular, the dairy sector is one of the most proactive sectors not only at international but also at national level: many national LCA studies have been carried out over the years. The commitment of the logistic and trading sector is also considerable, and many initiatives have been undertaken by the major retail chains. Finally, there is a growing interest regarding the environmental impact arising from food waste, given that about one- third of the food produced in the world for human consumption every year (1.3 billion tonnes) is lost or wasted. In this regard, it is important to be aware that such waste is relevant and impactful not only from an economic but also from an environmental perspective. The last consideration concerns the consumer side: greater commitment by NGOs and other consumer associations is desirable in the sense of making LCA’s applications, advantages, and opportunities more accessible and understandable for the consumer.

Impacts arising from the agri-food system tend to be different from the ones typically modelled in LCA (non-food based products). This necessitates a different methodological approach in the agri-food sector, related (for example) to the selection of the most suitable FU, system boundaries, allocation method, fertilisers, and pesticide dispersion models. Section  1.4 about the methodological issues focussed on the general issues arising from the development of an LCA study of a food product. Specific aspects related to the chosen sectors are analysed in the following chapters.

Accurate and consistent LCA studies require representative life cycle inventories acting as fundamental building blocks. Section  1.5 on LCI databases highlighted that:

  • Albeit many LCI databases have been developed, most of them are characterised by a lack of transparency and are often incomplete because they take into account only a few input-output flows; this lack of information concerning the impact of food products can lead to ambiguous interpretations and conclusions; furthermore, these databases are often not up-to-date and not regionalised. Finally, the databases are frequently inconsistent with each other, because of different approaches and assumptions. There is a need for clear, well-documented, and consistent data to increase the accuracy and comparability of LCA in the food sector.

Finally, the main hotspots identified in the dietary issues section (1.6) are:

  • the need to change the consumer’s dietary behaviour to reduce the environmental impact of foods;

  • the need for action to increase efficiency in the production chain and reduce food waste;

  • the need for dietary changes to reduce environmental impacts of the agri-food sector at the lowest economic cost.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Notarnicola, B., Tassielli, G., Renzulli, P., Lo Giudice, A. (2015). Life Cycle Assessment in the agri-food sector: an overview of its key aspects, international initiatives, certification, labelling schemesand methodological issues. In: Notarnicola, B., Salomone, R., Petti, L., Renzulli, P., Roma, R., Cerutti, A. (eds) Life Cycle Assessment in the Agri-food Sector. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11940-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics