Advertisement

Completion Time and Next Activity Prediction of Processes Using Sequential Pattern Mining

  • Michelangelo Ceci
  • Pasqua Fabiana Lanotte
  • Fabio Fumarola
  • Dario Pietro Cavallo
  • Donato Malerba
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8777)

Abstract

Process mining is a research discipline that aims to discover, monitor and improve real processing using event logs. In this paper we describe a novel approach that (i) identifies partial process models by exploiting sequential pattern mining and (ii) uses the additional information about the activities matching a partial process model to train nested prediction models from event logs. Models can be used to predict the next activity and completion time of a new (running) process instance. We compare our approach with a model based on Transition Systems implemented in the ProM5 Suite and show that the attributes in the event log can improve the accuracy of the model without decreasing performances. The experimental results show how our algorithm improves of a large margin ProM5 in predicting the completion time of a process, while it presents competitive results for next activity prediction.

Keywords

Completion Time Sequence Tree Activity Prediction Process Instance Frequent Sequence 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Appice, A., Ceci, M., Turi, A., Malerba, D.: A parallel, distributed algorithm for relational frequent pattern discovery from very large data sets. Intell. Data Anal. 15(1), 69–88 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Carmona, J., Cortadella, J., Kishinevsky, M.: A Region-Based Algorithm for Discovering Petri Nets from Event Logs. In: Dumas, M., Reichert, M., Shan, M.-C. (eds.) BPM 2008. LNCS, vol. 5240, pp. 358–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ceci, M., Appice, A.: Spatial associative classification: propositional vs structural approach. J. Intell. Inf. Syst. 27(3), 191–213 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dongen, B., Busi, N., Pinna, G., Aalst, W.: An Iterative Algorithm for Applying the Theory of Regions in Process Mining. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Formal Approaches to Business Processes and Web Services, pp. 36–55 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Folino, F., Greco, G., Guzzo, A., Pontieri, L.: Mining usage scenarios in business processes: Outlier-aware discovery and run-time prediction. Data Knowl. Eng. 70(12), 1005–1029 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hyndman, R.J., Koehler, A.B.: Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 679–688 (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Medeiros, A.K., Weijters, A.J., Aalst, W.M.: Genetic process mining: An experimental evaluation. Data Min. Knowl. Discov. 14(2), 245–304 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1993)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salvemini, E., Fumarola, F., Malerba, D., Han, J.: FAST sequence mining based on sparse id-lists. In: Kryszkiewicz, M., Rybinski, H., Skowron, A., Raś, Z.W. (eds.) ISMIS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6804, pp. 316–325. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Stojanova, D., Ceci, M., Appice, A., Malerba, D., Džeroski, S.: Global and local spatial autocorrelation in predictive clustering trees. In: Elomaa, T., Hollmén, J., Mannila, H. (eds.) DS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6926, pp. 307–322. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Process Mining: Discovery, Conformance and Enhancement of Business Processes, 1st edn. Springer Publishing Company, Incorporated (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Pesic, M., Song, M.: Beyond process mining: From the past to present and future. In: Pernici, B. (ed.) CAiSE 2010. LNCS, vol. 6051, pp. 38–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Schonenberg, M.H., Song, M.: Time prediction based on process mining. Inf. Syst. 36(2), 450–475 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van der Aalst, W.M.P., Weijter, A., Maruster, L.: Workflow mining: Discovering process models from event logs. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 16, 2004 (2003)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wang, Y., Witten, I.H.: Induction of model trees for predicting continuous classes (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michelangelo Ceci
    • 1
  • Pasqua Fabiana Lanotte
    • 1
  • Fabio Fumarola
    • 1
  • Dario Pietro Cavallo
    • 1
  • Donato Malerba
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di InformaticaUniversity of Bari “Aldo Moro”BariItaly

Personalised recommendations