GRL: A Specification Language for Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous Systems

  • Fatma Jebali
  • Frédéric Lang
  • Radu Mateescu
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8829)


A GALS (Globally Asynchronous, Locally Synchronous) system consists of several synchronous subsystems that evolve concurrently and interact with each other asynchronously. Most formalisms and design tools support either the synchronous paradigm or the asynchronous paradigm but rarely combine both, which requires an intricate modeling of GALS systems. In this paper, we present a new language, called GRL (GALS Representation Language) designed to model GALS systems in an abstract and versatile manner for the purpose of formal verification. GRL has formal semantics combining the synchronous reactive model underlying dataflow languages and the asynchronous concurrent model underlying process algebras. We present the basic concepts and the main constructs of the language, together with an illustrative example.


Model Check Formal Semantic Process Algebra Permanent Variable Synchronous System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Bae, K., Ölveczky, P.C., Meseguer, J.: Definition, semantics, and analysis of multirate synchronous aadl. In: Proc. of FM. Springer (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berry, G., Gonthier, G.: The ESTEREL synchronous programming language: design, semantics, implementation. Science of Computer Programming 19(2), 87–152 (1992)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berry, G., Ramesh, S., Shyamasundar, R.K.: Communicating reactive processes. In: Proc. of POPL, pp. 85–98. ACM Press (1993)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berry, G., Sentovich, E.: Multiclock Esterel. In: Margaria, T., Melham, T.F. (eds.) CHARME 2001. LNCS, vol. 2144, pp. 110–125. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bultan, T.: Action language: A specification language for model checking reactive systems. In: Proc. of ICSE. ACM (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Carlsson, J., Palmkvist, K., Wanhammar, L.: Synchronous design flow for Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous systems. In: Proc. of ICC, WSEAS (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Champelovier, D., Clerc, X., Garavel, H., Guerte, Y., McKinty, C., Powazny, V., Lang, F., Serwe, W., Smeding, G.: Reference manual of the LOTOS NT to LOTOS translator (version 5.4). INRIA/VASY (September 2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Coste, N., Hermanns, H., Lantreibecq, E., Serwe, W.: Towards Performance Prediction of Compositional Models in Industrial GALS Designs. In: Bouajjani, A., Maler, O. (eds.) CAV 2009. LNCS, vol. 5643, pp. 204–218. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Doucet, F., Menarini, M., Krüger, I.H., Gupta, R.K., Talpin, J.-P.: A verification approach for GALS integration of synchronous components. Electr. Notes Theor. Comput. Sci. 146(2), 105–131 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Garavel, H., Lang, F., Mateescu, R.: Compiler Construction Using LOTOS NT. In: Nigel Horspool, R. (ed.) CC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2304, p. 9. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Garavel, H., Lang, F., Mateescu, R., Serwe, W.: CADP 2011: A Toolbox for the Construction and Analysis of Distributed Processes. STTT 15(2), 89–107 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Garavel, H., Salaun, G., Serwe, W.: On the Semantics of Communicating Hardware Processes and their Translation into LOTOS for the Verification of Asynchronous Circuits with CADP. In: Science of Computer Programming (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Garavel, H., Thivolle, D.: Verification of GALS Systems by Combining Synchronous Languages and Process Calculi. In: Păsăreanu, C.S. (ed.) Model Checking Software. LNCS, vol. 5578, pp. 241–260. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Garavel, H., Viho, C., Zendri, M.: System design of a CC-NUMA multiprocessor architecture using formal specification, model-checking, co-simulation, and test generation. STTT 3(3), 314–331 (2001)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Girault, A., Ménier, C.: Automatic Production of Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous Systems. In: Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.L., Sifakis, J. (eds.) EMSOFT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2491, pp. 266–281. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Günther, H., Milius, S., Möller, O.: On the Formal Verification of Systems of Synchronous Software Components. In: Ortmeier, F., Lipaczewski, M. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2012. LNCS, vol. 7612, pp. 291–304. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Harel, D.: Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems. Science of Computer Programming 8(3), 231–274 (1987)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Heitmeyer, C.L., Jeffords, R.D., Labaw, B.G.: Automated consistency checking of requirements specifications. ACM Trans. on Software Engineering and Methodology 5(3), 231–261 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hoare, C.A.R.: Communicating Sequential Processes. Communications of the ACM 21(8), 666–677 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holzmann, G.J.: The model checker SPIN. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 23(5) (1997)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jebali, F., Lang, F., Mateescu, R.: GRL: A Specification Language for Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous Systems. Research Report 8527, Inria (April 2014),
  22. 22.
    Lantreibecq, E., Serwe, W.: Model Checking and Co-simulation of a Dynamic Task Dispatcher Circuit Using CADP. In: Salaün, G., Schätz, B. (eds.) FMICS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6959, pp. 180–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leveson, N.G., Heimdahl, M.P.E., Hildreth, H., Reese, J.D.: Requirements specification for process-control systems. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 20(9), 684–707 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Malik, A., Salcic, Z., Roop, P.S., Girault, A.: SystemJ: A GALS language for system level design. Comput. Lang. Syst. Struct. 36(4), 317–344 (2010)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Miller, S., Anderson, E., Wagner, L., Whalen, M., Heimdahl, M.: Formal verification of flight critical software. In: Proc. of the AIAA Guidance, Navigation and Control Conference and Exhibit (2005)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mousavi, M.R., Le Guernic, P., Talpin, J.-P., Shukla, S.K., Basten, T.: Modeling and Validating Globally Asynchronous Design in Synchronous Frameworks. In: Proc. of DATE. IEEE Computer Society (2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moutinho, F., Gomes, L.: State space generation for Petri nets-based GALS systems. In: Proc. of ICIT (2012)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Muttersbach, J., Villiger, T., Fichtner, W.: Practical design of globally-asynchronous locally-synchronous systems. In: Proc. of the International Symposium on Advanced Research in Asynchronous Circuits and Systems (2000)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ramesh, S.: Communicating reactive state machines: Design, model and implementation. In: IFAC Workshop on Distributed Computer Control Systems (1998)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Singh, M., Theobald, M.: Generalized latency-insensitive systems for single-clock and multi-clock architectures. In: Proc. of DATE, vol. 2. IEEE (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Yoong, L.H., Shaw, G., Roop, P.S., Salcic, Z.: Synthesizing Globally Asynchronous Locally Synchronous Systems With IEC 61499. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C 42(6), 1465–1477 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fatma Jebali
    • 1
    • 2
  • Frédéric Lang
    • 1
    • 2
  • Radu Mateescu
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Inria, Univ. Grenoble Alpes, LIGGrenobleFrance
  2. 2.CNRS, LIGGrenobleFrance

Personalised recommendations