Coordination in Situated Systems: Engineering MAS Environment in TuCSoN

  • Stefano Mariani
  • Andrea Omicini
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8729)


Multi-agent systems (MAS) provide a well-founded approach to the engineering of situated systems, where governing the interaction of a multiplicity of autonomous, distributed components with the environment represents one of the most critical issues. By interpreting situatedness as a coordination issue, in this paper we describe the TuCSoN coordination architecture for situated MAS, and show how the corresponding TuCSoN coordination technology can be effectively used for engineering MAS environment.


Multiagent System Java Class Situate Interaction Tuple Space Probe Side 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Fortino, G., Garro, A., Mascillaro, S., Russo, W.: Using event-driven lightweight DSC-based agents for MAS modelling. International Journal of Agent-Oriented Software Engineering 4(2), 113–140 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aiello, F., Bellifemine, F.L., Fortino, G., Galzarano, S., Gravina, R.: An agent-based signal processing in-node environment for real-time human activity monitoring based on wireless body sensor networks. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 24(7), 1147–1161 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Weyns, D., Omicini, A., Odell, J.J.: Environment as a first-class abstraction in multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 14(1), 5–30 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Suchman, L.A.: Situated actions. In: Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human-Machine Communication, pp. 49–67. Cambridge University Press, New York (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26(1), 87–119 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Omicini, A., Mariani, S.: Coordination for situated MAS: Towards an event-driven architecture. In: Moldt, D., Rölke, H. (eds.) International Workshop on Petri Nets and Software Engineering (PNSE 2013). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 989, pp. 17–22. Sun SITE Central Europe, RWTH Aachen University (August 6, 2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Omicini, A., Zambonelli, F.: Coordination for Internet application development. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 2(3), 251–269 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Omicini, A., Ricci, A., Viroli, M., Castelfranchi, C., Tummolini, L.: Coordination artifacts: Environment-based coordination for intelligent agents. In: Jennings, N.R., Sierra, C., Sonenberg, L., Tambe, M. (eds.) 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2004), vol. 1, pp. 286–293. ACM, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Omicini, A., Denti, E.: From tuple spaces to tuple centres. Science of Computer Programming 41(3), 277–294 (2001)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Omicini, A., Ricci, A., Viroli, M.: Artifacts in the A&A meta-model for multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 17(3), 432–456 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Omicini, A.: Towards a notion of agent coordination context. In: Marinescu, D.C., Lee, C. (eds.) Process Coordination and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 187–200. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2002)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Casadei, M., Omicini, A.: Situated tuple centres in ReSpecT. In: Shin, S.Y., Ossowski, S., Menezes, R., Viroli, M. (eds.) 24th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (SAC 2009), vol. III, pp. 1361–1368. ACM, Honolulu (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefano Mariani
    • 1
  • Andrea Omicini
    • 1
  1. 1.Alma Mater Studiorum –Università di BolognaCesenaItaly

Personalised recommendations