Seven Issues on Distributed Situation Awareness Measurement in Complex Socio-technical Systems

  • Maria Mikela Chatzimichailidou
  • Angelos Protopapas
  • Ioannis M. Dokas

Abstract

Distributed Situation Awareness is the modern perception of Situation Awareness that considers it as an emergent property of a complex socio-technical system rather than an individual endeavor. Although there are a plethora of Situation Awareness models and measurement techniques, it is doubtful whether they mirror the critical elements and behaviours of real collaborative and complex environments. This paper collects some of the most crucial issues surrounding the existing SA measurements techniques that arose under the complex socio-technical systems settings, and along these lines it addresses the need to change the paradigm in order to prepare the ground for a future Distributed Situation Awareness assessment technique, moving beyond the existing network-based approaches.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Endsley, M.R.: Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37(1), 32–64 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Salmon, P.M., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P., McMaster, R., Young, M.S.: What really is going on? Review of situation awareness models for individuals and teams. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 9(4), 297–323 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Salmon, P.M., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D.P.: Distributed situation awareness: Theory, measurement and application to teamwork. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D.P.: Is situation awareness all in the mind? Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 11(1-2), 29–40 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Naderpour, M., Lu, J., Zhang, G.: A situation risk awareness approach for process systems safety. Safety Science 64, 173–189 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S.: Giving ergonomics away? The application of ergonomics methods by novices. Applied Ergonomics 34(5), 479–490 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Salmon, P.M., Stanton, N.A., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D., Ladva, D., Rafferty, L., Young, M.: Measuring Situation Awareness in complex systems: Comparison of measures study. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 39(3), 490–500 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Leveson, N.: Engineering a safer world: Systems thinking applied to safety. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Salas, E., Prince, C., Baker, D.P., Shrestha, L.: Situation awareness in team performance: Implications for measurement and training. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 37(1), 123–136 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Endsley, M., Jones, W.M.: Situation Awareness Information Dominance and Information Warfare. Logicon Technical Services Inc., Dayton (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Endsley, M.R.: Design and evaluation for situation awareness enhancement. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, pp. 97–101. SAGE Publications (1988)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sarter, N.B., Woods, D.D.: Situation awareness: A critical but ill-defined phenomenon. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 1(1), 45–57 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smart, P.R., Bahrami, A., Braines, D., McRae-Spencer, D., Yuan, J., Shadbolt, N.R.: Semantic technologies and enhanced situation awareness (2007), http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/264351/
  14. 14.
    Stanton, N.A., Stewart, R., Harris, D., Houghton, R.J., Baber, C., McMaster, R., Salmon, P.M., Hoyle, G., Walker, G.H., Young, M.S., Linsell, M., Dymott, R., Green, D.: Distributed situation awareness in dynamic systems: theoretical development and application of an ergonomics methodology. Ergonomics 49(12-13), 1288–1311 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hutchins, E.: Cognition in the Wild. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Jenkins, D.: Genotype and phenotype schemata and their role in distributed situation awareness in collaborative systems. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 10(1), 43–68 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Walker, G.H., Baber, C., Jenkins, D.P.: Human factors methods: a practical guide for engineering and design. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd. (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Stanton, N.A.: Representing distributed cognition in complex systems: how a submarine returns to periscope depth. Ergonomics (ahead-of-print), 1–16 (2013)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boy, G.A.: Orchestrating situation awareness and authority in complex socio-technical systems. In: Aiguier, M., Caseau, Y., Krob, D., Rauzy, A. (eds.) Complex Systems Design & Management, vol. 126, pp. 285–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Neisser, U.: Cognition and reality: Principles and implications of cognitive psychology. WH Freeman/Times Books/Henry Holt & Co. (1976)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Endsley, M.R., Jones, W.M.: A model of inter-and intrateam situation awareness: Implications for design, training and measurement. In: New Trends in Cooperative Activities: Understanding System Dynamics in Complex Environments. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Maria Mikela Chatzimichailidou
    • 1
  • Angelos Protopapas
    • 1
  • Ioannis M. Dokas
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringDemocritus University of ThraceXanthiGreece

Personalised recommendations