Annotation and Personality: Individual Differences in Sentence Boundary Detection

  • Anton Stepikhov
  • Anastassia Loukina
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 8773)

Abstract

The paper investigates the relationships between personality traits and expert manual annotation of unscripted speech. The analysis is based on the results of a psycholinguistic experiment in which the participants were asked to annotate sentence boundaries in transcriptions of Russian spoken monologues. Personality traits were measured using the Eysenck Personality Inventory and the Five Factor Personality Questionnaire. A multiple regression model showed that the traits measured by the Five Factor Personality Questionnaire along the scales ‘unemotionality vs. emotionality’ and ‘practicality vs. playfulness’ had significant effect on the average sentence length.

Keywords

sentence boundary detection spontaneous speech manual annotation Russian personality five factor personality model big five Eysenck personality inventory 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Liu, Y., Chawla, V.N., Harper, M.P., Shriberg, E., Stolcke, A.: A study in machine learning from imbalanced data for sentence boundary detection in speech. Computer Speech and Language 20(4), 468–494 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stepikhov, A.: Resolving Ambiguities in Sentence Boundary Detection in Russian Spontaneous Speech. In: Habernal, I., Matoušek, V. (eds.) TSD 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8082, pp. 426–433. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stepikhov, A.: Analysis of expert manual annotation of the russian spontaneous monologue: Evidence from sentence boundary detection. In: Železný, M., Habernal, I., Ronzhin, A. (eds.) SPECOM 2013. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8113, pp. 33–40. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Foster, P., Tonkyn, A., Wigglesworth, G.: Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons. Applied Linguistics 21(3), 354–375 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eysenck, H.J., Eysenck, S.B.G.: Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press, London (1964)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shmelev, A.G.: Test-oprosnik Ajzenka. In: Bodalev, A.A., Karpinskaya, et al. (eds.) Praktikum po Psikhodiagnostike. Psikhodiagnosticheskie Materialy, pp. 11–16. MGU, Moscow (1988) (in Russ.)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tsuji, H., Fujishima, Y., Tsuji, H., Natsuno, Y., Mukoyama, Y., Yamada, N., Morita, Y., Hata, K.: Five-factor model of personality: Concept, structure, and measurement of personality traits. Japanese Psychological Review 40(2), 239–259 (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khromov, A.B.: P’atifactornyj oprosnik lichnosti: Uchebno-metodicheskoe posobie. Izd-vo Kurganskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, Kurgan (2000) (in Russ.)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Block, J.: The Five-Factor Framing of Personality and Beyond: Some Ruminations. Psychological Inquiry 21(1), 2–25 (2010)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Swets, B., Desmet, T., Hambrick, D.Z., Ferreira, F.: The role of working memory in syntactic ambiguity resolution: A psychometric approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(1), 64–81 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Anton Stepikhov
    • 1
  • Anastassia Loukina
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of RussianSt. Petersburg State UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.Educational Testing ServicePrincetonUSA

Personalised recommendations