Merging Inhomogeneous Proximity Sensor Systems for Social Network Analysis

  • Amir Muaremi
  • Franz Gravenhorst
  • Julia Seiter
  • Agon Bexheti
  • Bert Arnrich
  • Gerhard Tröster
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 131)

Abstract

Proximity information is a valuable source for social network analysis. Smartphone based sensors, like GPS, Bluetooth and ANT+, can be used to obtain proximity information between individuals within a group. However, in real-life scenarios, different people use different devices, featuring different sensor modalities. To draw the most complete picture of the spatial proximities between individuals, it is advantageous to merge data from an inhomogeneous system into one common representation. In this work we describe strategies how to merge data from Bluetooth sensors with data from ANT+ sensors. Interconnection between both systems is achieved using pre-knowledge about social rules and additional infrastructure. Proposed methods are applied to a data collection from 41 participants during an 8 day pilgrimage. Data from peer-to-peer sensors as well as GPS sensors is collected. The merging steps are evaluated by calculating state-of-the art features from social network analysis. Results indicate that the merging steps improve the completeness of the obtained network information while not altering the morphology of the network.

Keywords

Proximity Smartphones Bluetooth ANT+ Pilgrims 

References

  1. 1.
    Aharony, N., Pan, W., Ip, C., Khayal, I., Pentland, A.: Social fMRI: investigating and shaping social mechanisms in the real world. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. (PUC) 7(6), 643–659 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bounova, G., de Weck, O.: Overview of metrics and their correlation patterns for multiple-metric topology analysis on heterogeneous graph ensembles. Phys. Rev. E 85, 016117 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Do, T., Gatica-Perez, D.: Human interaction discovery in smartphone proximity networks. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. (PUC) 17(3), 413–431 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Eagle, N., (Sandy) Pentland, A.: Reality mining: sensing complex social systems. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. (PUC) 10(4), 255–268 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peters, F.E.: The Hajj: The Muslim Pilgrimage to Mecca and the Holy Places. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1994)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Feese, S., Arnrich, B., Bürtscher, M., Meyer, B., Jona, K., Tröster, G.: CoenoFire: monitoring performance indicators of firefighters in real-world missions using smartphones. In: Proceedings of the ACM Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp) (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feese, S., Arnrich, B., Bürtscher, M., Meyer, B., Jona, K., Tröster, G.: Sensing group proximity dynamics of firefighting teams using smartphones. In: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Wearable Computing (ISWC) (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamhoum, F., Kray, C.: Supporting pilgrims in navigating densely crowded religious sites. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. (PUC) 16(8), 1013–1023 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mantoro, T., Jaafar, A., Aris, M., Ayu, M.: Hajjlocator: a hajj pilgrimage tracking framework in crowded ubiquitous environment. In: International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems (ICMCS) (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mohandes, M.: Pilgrim tracking and identification using the mobile phone. In: IEEE International Symposium on Consumer Electronics (ISCE) (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Muaremi, A., Seiter, J., Bexheti, A., Tröster, G.: Monitor and understand pilgrims: data collection using smartphones and wearable devices. In: International Workshop on Human Activity Sensing Corpus and its Application (HASCA) (2013)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Muaremi, A., Seiter, J., Gravenhorst, F., Bexheti, A., Arnrich, B., Tröster, G.: Monitor pilgrims: prayer activity recognition using wearable sensors. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Body Area Networks (Bodynets) (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Olguin, D., Waber, B., Kim, T., Mohan, A., Ara, K., Pentland, A.: Sensible organizations: technology and methodology for automatically measuring organizational behavior. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man and Cybern. 39(1), 43–55 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amir Muaremi
    • 1
  • Franz Gravenhorst
    • 1
  • Julia Seiter
    • 1
  • Agon Bexheti
    • 2
  • Bert Arnrich
    • 3
  • Gerhard Tröster
    • 1
  1. 1.Wearable Computing LabETH ZurichZurichSwitzerland
  2. 2.Artificial Intelligence LaboratoryEPFLLausanneSwitzerland
  3. 3.Computer Engineering DepartmentBogaziçi UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations