Four-Winged Flapping Flyer in Forward Flight

  • R. Godoy-Diana
  • P. Jain
  • M. Centeno
  • A. Weinreb
  • B. Thiria
Conference paper
Part of the Environmental Science and Engineering book series (ESE)

Abstract

We study experimentally a four-winged flapping flyer with chord-wise flexible wings in a self-propelled setup. For a given physical configuration of the flyer (i.e. fixed distance between the forewing and hindwing pairs and fixed wing flexibility), we explore the kinematic parameter space constituted by the flapping frequency and the forewing-hindwing phase lag. Cruising speed and consumed electric power measurements are performed for each point in the \((f,\varphi )\) parameter space and allow us to discuss the problem of performance and efficiency in four-winged flapping flight. We show that different phase-lags are needed for the system to be optimised for fastest flight or lowest energy consumption. A conjecture of the underlying mechanism is proposed in terms of the coupled dynamics of the forewing-hindwing phase lag and the deformation kinematics of the flexible wings.

References

  1. Alexander DE (1984) Unusual phase relationships between the forewings and hindwings in flying dragonflies. J Exp Biol 109(1):379–383Google Scholar
  2. Alexander DE (1986) Wind tunnel studies of turns by flying dragonflies. J Exp Biol 122(1):81–98Google Scholar
  3. Azuma A, Azuma S, Watanabe I, Furuta T (1985) Flight mechanics of a dragonfly. J Exp Biol 116(1):79–107Google Scholar
  4. Azuma A, Watanabe T (1988) Flight performance of a dragonfly. J Exp Biol 137(1):221–252Google Scholar
  5. Bergou AJ, Ristroph L, Guckenheimer J, Cohen I, Wang ZJ (2010) Fruit flies modulate passive wing pitching to generate in-flight turns. Phys Rev Lett 104(14):148101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bimbard G, Kolomenskiy D, Bouteleux O, Casas J, Godoy-Diana R (2013) Force balance in the take-off of a pierid butterfly: relative importance and timing of leg impulsion and aerodynamic forces. J Exp Biol 216(18):3551–3563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Daniel TL, Combes SA (2002) Flexible wings and fins: bending by inertial or fluid-dynamic forces. Integr Comp Biol 42(5):1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kang CK, Aono H, Cesnik CES, Shyy W (2011) Effects of flexibility on the aerodynamic performance of flapping wings. J Fluid Mech 689(1):32–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kolomenskiy D, Engels T, Schneider K (2013) Numerical modelling of flexible heaving foils. J Aero Aqua Bio-mech 3(1):22–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Masoud H, Alexeev A (2010) Resonance of flexible flapping wings at low Reynolds number. Phys Rev E 81(5):056304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maybury WJ, Lehmann FO (2004) The fluid dynamics of flight control by kinematic phase lag variation between two robotic insect wings. J Exp Biol 207(26):4707–4726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ramananarivo S, Godoy-Diana R, Thiria B (2011) Rather than resonance, flapping wing flyers may play on aerodynamics to improve performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci (USA) 108(15):5964–5969CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rival D, Schönweitz D, Tropea C (2011) Vortex interaction of tandem pitching and plunging plates: a two-dimensional model of hovering dragonfly-like flight. Bioinspir Biomim 6(1):016008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rüppell G (1989) Kinematic analysis of symmetrical flight manoeuvres of Odonata. J Exp Biol 144(1):13–42Google Scholar
  15. Shyy W, Aono H, Chimakurthi SK, Trizila P, Kang CK, Cesnik CES, Liu H (2010) Recent progress in flapping wing aerodynamics and aeroelasticity. Prog Aerosp Sci 46(7):284–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Spagnolie SE, Moret L, Shelley MJ, Zhang J (2010) Surprising behaviors in flapping locomotion with passive pitching. Phys Fluids 22(4):041903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Thiria B, Godoy-Diana R (2010) How wing compliance drives the efficiency of self-propelled flapping flyers. Phys Rev E 82:015303(R)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Thomas ALR, Taylor GK, Srygley RB, Nudds RL, Bomphrey RJ (2004) Dragonfly flight: free-flight and tethered flow visualizations reveal a diverse array of unsteady lift-generating mechanisms, controlled primarily via angle of attack. J Exp Biol 207(24):4299–4323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Usherwood JR, Lehmann FO (2008) Phasing of dragonfly wings can improve aerodynamic efficiency by removing swirl. J R Soc Interface 5(28):1303–1307CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wakeling JM, Ellington CP (1997a) Dragonfly flight. II. Velocities, accelerations and kinematics of flapping flight. J Exp Biol 200(3):557–582Google Scholar
  21. Wakeling JM, Ellington CP (1997b) Dragonfly flight. III. Lift and power requirements. J Exp Biol 200(3):583–600Google Scholar
  22. Wang ZJ, Russell D (2007) Effect of forewing and hindwing interactions on aerodynamic forces and power in hovering dragonfly flight. Phys Rev Lett 99(14):148101CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • R. Godoy-Diana
    • 1
  • P. Jain
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. Centeno
    • 1
    • 3
  • A. Weinreb
    • 1
  • B. Thiria
    • 1
  1. 1.Physique et Mécanique des Milieux Hetérogènes (PMMH, UMR 7636)CNRS; ESPCI ParisTech; UPMC (Paris 6); Univ. Paris Diderot (Paris 7)Paris, Cedex 5France
  2. 2.Indian Institute of TechnologyKharagpurIndia
  3. 3.Facultad de CienciasUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de MéxicoMexico CityMexico

Personalised recommendations