Role-Driven BITA: Approach and Industrial Case Study

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 183)

Abstract

In the current situation of market globalisation and increasing competition, the previously developed business process and supporting IT tools appear to be inefficient. As a result, there is a need to design new, knowledge-based workflows and supporting IT tools to increase efficiency of designing and maintaining ranges of new product classes. The paper presents a role-driven approach to BITA based on the experience from two industrial case studies where it has been partially implemented. The approach is based on the ontological knowledge representation and considering the business processes from perspectives of different user roles. Each role representative works with his/her part of the common ontology, with the ontology parts overlapping.

Keywords

Role Ontology BITA 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research was supported partly by projects funded by grants # 13-07-13159, # 13-07-12095, # 14-07-00345, # 12-07-00298, and # 12-07-00302 of the Russian Foundation for Basic Research, project 213 (program 15) of the Presidium of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and project #2.2 of the basic research program “Intelligent information technologies, system analysis and automation” of the Nanotechnology and Information technology Department of the Russian Academy of Sciences. This work was also partially financially supported by Government of Russian Federation, Grant 074-U01. The paper is due to the project COBIT sponsored by the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education.

References

  1. 1.
    Shilov, N.: Product-service system configuration in SOA-based environment. In: Abramowicz, W., Maciaszek, L., Węcel, K. (eds.) BIS Workshops 2011 and BIS 2011. LNBIP, vol. 97, pp. 184–195. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing innovation, 208 p. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Smirnov, A., Pashkin, M., Chilov, N., Levashova, T.: Knowledge fusion in the business information environment for e-Manufacturing pursuing mass customisation. In: Rautenstrauch, C., Seelmann-Eggebert, R., Turowski, K. (eds.) Moving into Mass Customization. Information Systems and Management Principles, pp. 153−175. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Oroszi, A., Jung, T., Smirnov, A., Shilov, N., Kashevnik, A.: Ontology-driven codification for discrete and modular products. Int. J. Prod. Dev. Inderscience 8(2), 162–177 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smirnov, A., Kashevnik, A., Teslya, N., Shilov, N., Oroszi, A., Sinko, M., Humpf, M., Arneving, J.: Knowledge management for complex product development. In: Bernard, A., Dutta, D., Rivest, L. (eds.) PLM 2013. IFIP AICT, vol. 409, pp. 110–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Golm, F., Smirnov, A.V.: ProCon: decision support for resource management in a global production network. In: Logananthara, R., Palm, G., Ali, M. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1821, pp. 345–350. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Golm, F., Smirnov, A.: Virtual production network configuration: ACS-approach and tools. In: Advances in Networked Enterprises: The Proceedings of the 4th IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Information Technology for Balanced Automation Systems in Production and Transportation (BASYS 2000), pp. 103–110. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Bosten (2000)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smirnov, A., Sandkuhl, K., Shilov, N., Kashevnik, A.: “Product-Process-Machine” system modeling: approach and industrial case studies. In: Grabis, J., Kirikova, M. (eds.) PoEM 2013. LNBIP, vol. 165, pp. 251–265. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bradfield, D.J., Gao, J.X., Soltan, H.: A Metaknowledge Approach to Facilitate Knowledge Sharing in the Global Product Development Process. Comput.-Aided Des. Appl. 4(1–4), 519–528 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Chan, E.C.K., Yu, K.M.: A framework of ontology-enabled product knowledge management. Int. J. Prod. Dev. 4(3–4), 241–254 (2007). Inderscience PublishersCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Patil, L., Dutta, D., Sriram, R.: Ontology-based exchange of product data semantics. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2(3), 213–225 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Uschold, M., Grüninger, M.: Ontologies: principles, methods and applications. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 11(2), 93–155 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    VDMA, German Engineering Federation (2013). http://www.vdma.org/en_GB/

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.St. Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of SciencesSt. PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.ITMO UniversitySt. PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations